{"id":127,"date":"2010-11-03T11:52:05","date_gmt":"2010-11-03T15:52:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/community\/philosophicalfragments\/?p=127"},"modified":"2010-11-03T11:52:05","modified_gmt":"2010-11-03T15:52:05","slug":"election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/11\/03\/election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party\/","title":{"rendered":"Election 2010 &#8211; Major Winners: DC Democrat Power-Brokers, Republican Party, and (Mostly) the Tea Party"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p>1.\u00a0 <strong>Winner: DC Power-Broker Democrats<\/strong>.\u00a0 If you are a Republican, don\u2019t fool yourself.\u00a0 Last night could have been much worse for the Democrats.\u00a0 The loss of the House was a given.\u00a0 But Democrats held onto the Senate, and while Republicans picked up many governorships the Democrats held onto some important ones, California and New York foremost among them.\u00a0 And predictions that Republicans could gain 80 or even 100 were shown to be exaggerated.<\/p>\n<p>Democrats also prevented some fantastic Republican candidates from coming to power. Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman were two of the most promising female Republican candidates in a generation.\u00a0 Both are personally appealing, extremely competent and intelligent, female executives with vast personal fortunes, and they could have been very appealing on a national level, especially if they had had the opportunity to build records of accomplishment in Sacramento and Washington.<\/p>\n<p>The Democrats also avoided Senator Sharron Angle and Senator Christine O\u2019Donnell.\u00a0 While neither one could have been as appealing nationally as Fiorina and Whitman, they connected with grass-roots conservatives in a powerful way.\u00a0 Haley and Bachmann won, Angle and O\u2019Donnell lost; the Mama Grizzlies were 2 for 4.<\/p>\n<p>At the end of the day, the most powerful Democrats in Washington must have gone to bed at least a little relieved.\u00a0 They still have the Senate by a comfortable margin; they still have the White House; they have at least two more years of the power to appoint nominees for the Supreme Court.\u00a0 Also, although winning so many governorships (at least 10 and probably more like 14) will help Republicans in the 2012 Presidential race, it\u2019s going to be very tough to defeat Obama in 2012.<\/p>\n<p>There will be no clear-cut showdowns between a Republican Congress and a Democrat White House, just a divided Congress and a liberal White House.<\/p>\n<p>2.\u00a0 <strong>Winner \u2013 Republican Party<\/strong>.\u00a0 In spite of everything I just said, this was a tsunami election.\u00a0 Some very important Democrats like Reid and Boxer were able to grab hold of a tree and ride it out; but it was a tsunami nonetheless.\u00a0 By any standard, the pick-up of 60-plus House Seats is a historic victory.\u00a0 Bigger than 1994.\u00a0 Bigger than any margin, in fact, for over 60 years.\u00a0 Republicans will also pick up at least 6 seats in the Senate and at least 10 governorships.\u00a0 Many powerful, long-serving Democrats like Ike Skelton and Russ Feingold just lost their jobs.<\/p>\n<p>While Republicans did not win control of the Senate, they <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/stories\/1010\/44289.html\" target=\"_blank\" class=\" decorated-link\" rel=\"nofollow\">will<\/a> <\/em>win control in 2012 unless the national political climate changes dramatically.\u00a0 23 Senate seats that are  currently held by Democrats or independents that caucus with the  Democrats will be up for reelection, compared with only 10 seats held by  Republicans.\u00a0 Democrats will be defending Senate seats in three states  where Obama lost in 2008 (Nebrasks, North Dakota and Montana) and more  in states where Democrats lost last night (such as Ohio, Florida and  Missouri).<\/p>\n<p>Also, very importantly, many state houses swung to the Republicans.\u00a0 At least 17 state legislative bodies (houses or senates) swung Republican \u2014 all over the country.\u00a0 The North Carolina and Alabama legislatures are Republican for the first time since 1870 and 1876.\u00a0 The Wisconsin and New Hampshire legislatures flipped entirely to the GOP by strong margins.\u00a0 State Houses went GOP in Indiana, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio, Iowa, Montana, and Colorado, and State Senates went GOP in Maine and Minnesota.\u00a0 In some states like Texas and Tennessee, Republicans went from a slight to a powerful majority.<\/p>\n<p>Republicans gained <em>everywhere<\/em>: East, West, North, South, Senate, House, governorships, state Houses, state Senates, in races big and small.\u00a0 The floundering Obama administration has weakened the Democrat brand and inspired more Americans to identify themselves as conservative and Republican.\u00a0 Its overreach, too, inspired a passion amongst conservatives and even independents that far outstrips the usual passion for midterm elections.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3.\u00a0 Winner (but not an unqualified victory) \u2013 The Tea Party<\/strong> <strong>Movement<\/strong>.\u00a0 Tea Partiers <em>really <\/em>wanted to defeat Harry Reid.\u00a0 They also <em>really <\/em>wanted Joe Miller to win in Alaska, and it looks more likely that Murkowski will win.\u00a0 And Republicans almost certainly would have taken Harry Reid\u2019s seat, and Joe Biden\u2019s former seat, if the Tea Party had rallied around more thoroughly credible and more broadly appealing candidates.<\/p>\n<p>However, let there be no mistake: the Republican party was the massive beneficiary of Tea Party largess last night.\u00a0 Tea Partiers are not at all thrilled with the Republican party, but they are furious with the Democrats and wished simultaneously (1) to move the Republican party to the Right, toward fiscal responsibility and a more limited government, and (2) to give a reformed Republican party another chance and hold them accountable to act on traditional fiscal conservative principles.<\/p>\n<p>The Tea Party movement did not have to side with the Republican party.\u00a0 They might have chosen to form a third party.\u00a0 They did not do so.\u00a0 Instead they threw their overabundance of time and effort and funds to Republican candidates.\u00a0 They tried to support the most conservative electable candidate.\u00a0 Angle was probably electable, but a more electable candidate would have been wise.\u00a0 O\u2019Donnell was not electable in Delaware, and she hurt the Tea Party brand.<\/p>\n<p>The victories of the Tea Party movement, however, outnumber the defeats.\u00a0 The Tea Party helped to bring to a national platform a candidate of stratospheric political talents \u2013 and a person of deeply sincere Christian faith: Marco Rubio.\u00a0 Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Pat Toomey, Ron Johnson, Dan Coats and Nikki Haley will be strong torch-bearers for conservatives.\u00a0 And the GOP should be stumbling over itself to express gratitude to the Tea Party movement for its resounding victory last night.<\/p>\n<p>Later today, I will post quick-shot winners and losers:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Winners<\/strong>: Republican minorities, Jim DeMint, Joe Lieberman, Tea Party apologists.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Losers<\/strong>: Republican women, women in general, Nepotism (for Democrats), California, Weed Growers.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>1.\u00a0 Winner: DC Power-Broker Democrats.\u00a0 If you are a Republican, don\u2019t fool yourself.\u00a0 Last night could have been much worse for the Democrats.\u00a0 The loss of the House was a given.\u00a0 But Democrats held onto the Senate, and while Republicans picked up many governorships the Democrats held onto some important ones, California and New York [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":30,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[57],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-127","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-obama-presidency"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Election 2010 - Major Winners: DC Democrat Power-Brokers, Republican Party, and (Mostly) the Tea Party - Philosophical Fragments<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"1.\u00a0 Winner: DC Power-Broker Democrats.\u00a0 If you are a Republican, don&#039;t fool yourself.\u00a0 Last night could have been much worse for the Democrats.\u00a0 The loss\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/11\/03\/election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Election 2010 - Major Winners: DC Democrat Power-Brokers, Republican Party, and (Mostly) the Tea Party - Philosophical Fragments\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"1.\u00a0 Winner: DC Power-Broker Democrats.\u00a0 If you are a Republican, don&#039;t fool yourself.\u00a0 Last night could have been much worse for the Democrats.\u00a0 The loss\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/11\/03\/election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Philosophical Fragments\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-03T15:52:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Timothy Dalrymple\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Timothy Dalrymple\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/11\/03\/election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/11\/03\/election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party\/\",\"name\":\"Election 2010 - Major Winners: DC Democrat Power-Brokers, Republican Party, and (Mostly) the Tea Party - Philosophical Fragments\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-03T15:52:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2010-11-03T15:52:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/de8c9a4caf0177191808914f83826310\"},\"description\":\"1.\u00a0 Winner: DC Power-Broker Democrats.\u00a0 If you are a Republican, don't fool yourself.\u00a0 Last night could have been much worse for the Democrats.\u00a0 The loss\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/11\/03\/election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/11\/03\/election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/11\/03\/election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Election 2010 &#8211; Major Winners: DC Democrat Power-Brokers, Republican Party, and (Mostly) the Tea Party\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/\",\"name\":\"Philosophical Fragments\",\"description\":\"Daily Thoughts on Faith, Culture and Politics from Timothy Dalrymple\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/de8c9a4caf0177191808914f83826310\",\"name\":\"Timothy Dalrymple\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/53a368bbc8d116657d6af168549f2add?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/53a368bbc8d116657d6af168549f2add?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Timothy Dalrymple\"},\"description\":\"Timothy Dalrymple was raised in non-denominational evangelical congregations in California. The son and grandson of ministers, as a young boy he spent far too many hours each night staring at the ceiling and pondering the afterlife. \u00a0 In all his work he seeks a better understanding of why people do, and do not, come to faith, and researches and teaches in religion and science, faith and reason, theology and philosophy, the origins of atheism, Christology, and the religious transformations of suffering\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/author\/tdalrymple\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Election 2010 - Major Winners: DC Democrat Power-Brokers, Republican Party, and (Mostly) the Tea Party - Philosophical Fragments","description":"1.\u00a0 Winner: DC Power-Broker Democrats.\u00a0 If you are a Republican, don't fool yourself.\u00a0 Last night could have been much worse for the Democrats.\u00a0 The loss","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/11\/03\/election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Election 2010 - Major Winners: DC Democrat Power-Brokers, Republican Party, and (Mostly) the Tea Party - Philosophical Fragments","og_description":"1.\u00a0 Winner: DC Power-Broker Democrats.\u00a0 If you are a Republican, don't fool yourself.\u00a0 Last night could have been much worse for the Democrats.\u00a0 The loss","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/11\/03\/election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party\/","og_site_name":"Philosophical Fragments","article_published_time":"2010-11-03T15:52:05+00:00","author":"Timothy Dalrymple","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Timothy Dalrymple","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/11\/03\/election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/11\/03\/election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party\/","name":"Election 2010 - Major Winners: DC Democrat Power-Brokers, Republican Party, and (Mostly) the Tea Party - Philosophical Fragments","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-03T15:52:05+00:00","dateModified":"2010-11-03T15:52:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/de8c9a4caf0177191808914f83826310"},"description":"1.\u00a0 Winner: DC Power-Broker Democrats.\u00a0 If you are a Republican, don't fool yourself.\u00a0 Last night could have been much worse for the Democrats.\u00a0 The loss","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/11\/03\/election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/11\/03\/election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2010\/11\/03\/election-2010-major-winners-dc-democrat-power-brokers-republican-party-and-mostly-the-tea-party\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Election 2010 &#8211; Major Winners: DC Democrat Power-Brokers, Republican Party, and (Mostly) the Tea Party"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/","name":"Philosophical Fragments","description":"Daily Thoughts on Faith, Culture and Politics from Timothy Dalrymple","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/de8c9a4caf0177191808914f83826310","name":"Timothy Dalrymple","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/53a368bbc8d116657d6af168549f2add?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/53a368bbc8d116657d6af168549f2add?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","caption":"Timothy Dalrymple"},"description":"Timothy Dalrymple was raised in non-denominational evangelical congregations in California. The son and grandson of ministers, as a young boy he spent far too many hours each night staring at the ceiling and pondering the afterlife. \u00a0 In all his work he seeks a better understanding of why people do, and do not, come to faith, and researches and teaches in religion and science, faith and reason, theology and philosophy, the origins of atheism, Christology, and the religious transformations of suffering","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/author\/tdalrymple\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/30"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=127"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=127"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=127"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=127"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}