{"id":685,"date":"2011-07-27T11:22:17","date_gmt":"2011-07-27T15:22:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/community\/philosophicalfragments\/?p=685"},"modified":"2011-07-27T11:22:17","modified_gmt":"2011-07-27T15:22:17","slug":"anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2011\/07\/27\/anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic\/","title":{"rendered":"Anders Breivik as a Pragmatic Agnostic"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

Stephen Prothero writes<\/a> at CNN that when ideas accomplish positive change, we speak of the power of ideas, but when ideas \u201cdo things we do not want them to do, as in Oslo,\u201d then we pretend that ideas are powerless. \u00a0The contention that Anders Behring Breivik\u2019s actions \u201chad nothing to do with his Christian faith or his anti-Islamic ideology\u201d is, according to Prothero, \u201cwishful thinking of the most dangerous sort.\u201d<\/p>\n

I agree with Prothero that Christians should be mindful of the uses to which their ideas will be be put, and should examine the resources within the Christian tradition \u2013 its scriptures, its history, its thought \u2013 that can be assembled into a case for violence against the innocent. \u00a0Christians should have the humility to confess that they are not immune to criticism and to look for faults within themselves and their tradition.<\/p>\n

The problem, in this case, as Prothero would have seen with a careful reading of Breivik\u2019s manifesto, is that Breivik had no Christian \u201cfaith\u201d to speak of, and the \u201cideas\u201d that most influenced him were not Christian in any sense of the term. \u00a0Prothero makes no reference to Breivik\u2019s insistence that he is not a \u201creligious Christian\u201d with a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, or to Breivik\u2019s confession that he has no confidence that God exists but chooses to believe in God and the afterlife in order to give himself the courage for action. \u00a0Yes, Breivik\u00a0appropriated the title of the Knights Templar, but it\u2019s to Christianity\u2019s credit that he could not find modern Christian precedents for the kinds of acts he wanted to commit, but had to reach back over seven centuries to a repudiated series of military ventures in which Christian Europeans sought to secure the safety of Christians and ultimately recapture the territory of the Holy Land.<\/p>\n

This is one critical difference that explodes any simplistic moral equivalency between \u201cextremist Christians\u201d like Breivik and Islamic Jihadists. \u00a0While Breivik cites numerous Bible verses in his manifesto, he employs those verses in a way that no significant theologian or church authority has approved for centuries. \u00a0There is a kind of liberal Christian who is deeply committed to the proposition that conservative Christians are just as dangerous as al-Qaeda, but when they are pressed for equivalents to 9\/11 they have to reach back centuries to the Inquisition and the Crusades (which they portray in exaggerated and decontextualized forms), or else they refer to the actions of Timothy McVeigh, or the Olympics bomber Eric Rudolph, or the Holocaust Museum shooter James von Brunn, who are all expressly non-Christian<\/a>.<\/p>\n

My point here is not to indict Islam, but to note how the liberal illuminati seem incapable of distinguishing between ancient military conquests that were justified by a pre-modern way of thinking abandoned centuries ago, or individual madmen who resided in Christian cultures but were the opposite of devout believers, and (alas) the legions of pious Muslims whose acts of terrorism are supported by a vast infrastructure and celebrated by hundreds, perhaps thousands, of Imams throughout the Muslim world.<\/p>\n

So, yes, as I noted\u00a0yesterday<\/a>,\u00a0Christians should be the first to self-examine and self-criticize when someone perpetrates a terrorist act in the name of \u201cour Lord Jesus Christ.\u201d \u00a0But this does not mean that they should allow themselves to be slandered or lumped in with Imams who use their Mosques to recruit young men for the Jihad against the Great Satan. \u00a0Christians should present the facts.<\/p>\n

And the facts in this case are pretty compelling. \u00a0So compelling, in fact, that the attempt to smear conservative Christians with the blood of the 85 children (at last count) that Breivik slaughtered is morally appalling.<\/p>\n

Breivik explicitly denies that he is a \u201creligious Christian.\u201d \u00a0He admits that he does not possess what most evangelicals consider essential to faith: a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, which means a life of devotion, a life of seeking Christ and seeking to be like Christ, a life that honors what God revealed in and through Christ and accepts and celebrates the grace of God and forgiveness of sin that were made available to any person who would trust in them. \u00a0Rather, Breivik possesses the husk without the kernel, the cultural residue of faith and piety without the faith and piety that gave them life and direction. \u00a0He is not even sure that God exists, but chooses to believe in God and the afterlife (if this is any kind of belief at all) in order to give himself courage in the face of the dangers of his terrorist act.<\/p>\n

What exactly, then, is Breivik\u2019s \u201cChristianity\u201d? \u00a0He cares not for Christ or Christianity, but for Christendom. \u00a0Rod Dreher<\/a> gave perhaps the best definition I\u2019ve seen so far. \u00a0Breivik, he says, \u201csees the faith much as the Nazi leadership did: as a European tribal religion that can be instrumentalized to provide the basis for an ethno-cultural war against the Other.\u201d \u00a0The Nazis were not fond of what Breivik calls \u201creligious Christianity.\u201d \u00a0Hitler, rightly, did not believe that \u201ca personal relationship with Jesus Christ\u201d would suit his purposes. \u00a0Personal devotion, a living and breathing relationship with a God who is Love and a Son of God who teaches the love of enemies, does not \u201cinstrumentalize\u201d well into the wholesale slaughter of Jews, gypsies, political prisoners and Christian resisters. \u00a0Neither does it instrumentalize into the murder of 85 innocent children.<\/p>\n

One of the most revealing portions of the manifesto comes when Breivik\u2019s imagined interlocutor asks him what a person must believe in order to take up arms alongside his reconstituted Knights Templar. \u00a0You must be, he says, \u201ca practising Christian, a Christian agnostic or a Christian atheist (cultural Christian).\u201d \u00a0Since he has already identified himself as a cultural Christian and not a Christian atheist, it may be inferred (though this is not entirely clear) that he is a \u201cChristian agnostic.\u201d \u00a0The \u201ccultural factors,\u201d he says, are \u201cmore important than your personal relationship with God, Jesus, or the holy spirit.\u201d \u00a0In fact, Breivik speaks admiringly of \u201cOdinists,\u201d or Neo-Pagans who honor the ancient Norse gods, because this is a part of the Nordic cultural heritage. \u00a0One should prefer Christianity at least as a cultural matrix, he says, due to \u201cpragmatic considerations.\u201d \u00a0Only the the cross and only the Christian church (of which, in its present form, he is intensely critical) have the symbolic and ecclesial power to bind Europeans together in their battle against the Muslim threat.<\/p>\n

As a cultural Christian, I believe Christendom is essential for cultural reasons. After all,\u00a0Christianity is the ONLY cultural platform that can unite all Europeans\u2026As for secularism, are there any strong uniting symbols at all? I think not. In\u00a0order to protect your culture you need, at the very minimum, strong, uniting symbols\u00a0representing your culture. In this context, the cross is the unrivalled [sic] as it is the most\u00a0potent European symbol.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Being a Christian can mean many things, Breivik says. \u00a0It can mean that \u201cyou believe in and want to protect Europe\u2019s Christian cultural heritage.\u201d<\/div>\n

It is not required that you have a personal relationship with God or Jesus in order to fight\u00a0for our Christian cultural heritage and the European way. In many ways, our modern societies and European secularism is a result of European Christendom and the\u00a0enlightenment. It is therefore essential to understand the difference between a \u201cChristian\u00a0fundamentalist theocracy\u201d (everything we do not want) and a secular European society\u00a0based on our Christian cultural heritage (what we do want).<\/em><\/p>\n

So no, you don\u2019t need to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus to fight for our\u00a0Christian cultural heritage. It is enough that you are a Christian-agnostic or a Christian-atheist (an atheist who wants to preserve at least the basics of the European Christian cultural legacy (Christian holidays, Christmas and Easter). <\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Indeed, in his account of the secret meeting that reconstituted the Knights Templar, the largest contingent is \u201cChristian atheist.\u201d<\/p>\n

Why the self-appointed guardians of nuance want to ignore these facts \u2014 that Breivik was no kind of Christian in the ordinary sense, but more like an agnostic committed to Christian symbols for pragmatic reasons \u2014 in their rush to portray Breivik as a \u201cChristian fundamentalist\u201d or \u201cChristianist\u201d (which Andrew Sullivan uses to associate Breivik with conservative American Christians),\u00a0is a question well worth asking.<\/p>\n

But one thing Breivik gets right. \u00a0Secularism is fragmenting and hard to hold together in any coherent or animating vision for life, and multiculturalism in its current form is failing both the immigrants and those who have been residents for generations. \u00a0Breivik sought to retain the most outward cultural forms but not the living essence of Christian faith. \u00a0His fundamental impulses are areligious. \u00a0He found no inward guidance or transformation in his cultural Christianity, only symbols and structures he thought he could repurpose for violent ends.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s not wrong to ask the question, \u201cTo what extent was Anders Breivik a Christian and to what extent did this shape his deeds?\u201d \u00a0The answer is that he was not a Christian at all, unless we make Breivik the authority on what the term means. \u00a0But we should go on to ask, \u201cTo what extent was Breivik the inheritor of an inward secularism dressed up in the outward trappings of a long-since-abandoned Christian faith, and to what extent did this<\/em> shape his actions? \u00a0If he had inherited not just the fossil of faith, but the living reality, would it have stopped his hand?\u201d<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Stephen Prothero writes at CNN that when ideas accomplish positive change, we speak of the power of ideas, but when ideas \u201cdo things we do not want them to do, as in Oslo,\u201d then we pretend that ideas are powerless. \u00a0The contention that Anders Behring Breivik\u2019s actions \u201chad nothing to do with his Christian faith […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":30,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[84,309,352,381],"class_list":["post-685","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-anders-breivik","tag-norway-massacre","tag-rod-dreher","tag-stephen-prothero"],"yoast_head":"\nAnders Breivik as a Pragmatic Agnostic - Philosophical Fragments<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Stephen Prothero writes at CNN that when ideas accomplish positive change, we speak of the power of ideas, but when ideas "do things we do not want them\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2011\/07\/27\/anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Anders Breivik as a Pragmatic Agnostic - Philosophical Fragments\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Stephen Prothero writes at CNN that when ideas accomplish positive change, we speak of the power of ideas, but when ideas "do things we do not want them\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2011\/07\/27\/anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Philosophical Fragments\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-27T15:22:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Timothy Dalrymple\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Timothy Dalrymple\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2011\/07\/27\/anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2011\/07\/27\/anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic\/\",\"name\":\"Anders Breivik as a Pragmatic Agnostic - Philosophical Fragments\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-27T15:22:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-07-27T15:22:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/de8c9a4caf0177191808914f83826310\"},\"description\":\"Stephen Prothero writes at CNN that when ideas accomplish positive change, we speak of the power of ideas, but when ideas \\\"do things we do not want them\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2011\/07\/27\/anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2011\/07\/27\/anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2011\/07\/27\/anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Anders Breivik as a Pragmatic Agnostic\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/\",\"name\":\"Philosophical Fragments\",\"description\":\"Daily Thoughts on Faith, Culture and Politics from Timothy Dalrymple\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/de8c9a4caf0177191808914f83826310\",\"name\":\"Timothy Dalrymple\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/53a368bbc8d116657d6af168549f2add?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/53a368bbc8d116657d6af168549f2add?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Timothy Dalrymple\"},\"description\":\"Timothy Dalrymple was raised in non-denominational evangelical congregations in California. The son and grandson of ministers, as a young boy he spent far too many hours each night staring at the ceiling and pondering the afterlife. \u00a0 In all his work he seeks a better understanding of why people do, and do not, come to faith, and researches and teaches in religion and science, faith and reason, theology and philosophy, the origins of atheism, Christology, and the religious transformations of suffering\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/author\/tdalrymple\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Anders Breivik as a Pragmatic Agnostic - Philosophical Fragments","description":"Stephen Prothero writes at CNN that when ideas accomplish positive change, we speak of the power of ideas, but when ideas \"do things we do not want them","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2011\/07\/27\/anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Anders Breivik as a Pragmatic Agnostic - Philosophical Fragments","og_description":"Stephen Prothero writes at CNN that when ideas accomplish positive change, we speak of the power of ideas, but when ideas \"do things we do not want them","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2011\/07\/27\/anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic\/","og_site_name":"Philosophical Fragments","article_published_time":"2011-07-27T15:22:17+00:00","author":"Timothy Dalrymple","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Timothy Dalrymple","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2011\/07\/27\/anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2011\/07\/27\/anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic\/","name":"Anders Breivik as a Pragmatic Agnostic - Philosophical Fragments","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-27T15:22:17+00:00","dateModified":"2011-07-27T15:22:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/de8c9a4caf0177191808914f83826310"},"description":"Stephen Prothero writes at CNN that when ideas accomplish positive change, we speak of the power of ideas, but when ideas \"do things we do not want them","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2011\/07\/27\/anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2011\/07\/27\/anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/2011\/07\/27\/anders-breivik-as-a-pragmatic-agnostic\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Anders Breivik as a Pragmatic Agnostic"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/","name":"Philosophical Fragments","description":"Daily Thoughts on Faith, Culture and Politics from Timothy Dalrymple","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/de8c9a4caf0177191808914f83826310","name":"Timothy Dalrymple","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/53a368bbc8d116657d6af168549f2add?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/53a368bbc8d116657d6af168549f2add?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","caption":"Timothy Dalrymple"},"description":"Timothy Dalrymple was raised in non-denominational evangelical congregations in California. The son and grandson of ministers, as a young boy he spent far too many hours each night staring at the ceiling and pondering the afterlife. \u00a0 In all his work he seeks a better understanding of why people do, and do not, come to faith, and researches and teaches in religion and science, faith and reason, theology and philosophy, the origins of atheism, Christology, and the religious transformations of suffering","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/author\/tdalrymple\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/685","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/30"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=685"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/685\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=685"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=685"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/philosophicalfragments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=685"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}