\u00a0<\/p>\n
It\u2019s almost too ironic that the president announced this on the eve of the anniversary of 9\/11, which was the beginning of this war that appears to have ever-changing targets and no end.<\/p>\n
I have several questions. First, it was around a year ago that President Obama wanted to bomb Syria because of allegations of the use of chemical weapons against ISIS. If we had gone ahead with that plan, it most likely would have destroyed the remaining infrastructure in the war-torn country and handed a total victory to ISIS.<\/p>\n
I was totally against this, for a number of reasons. Among those reasons was my concern that bombing Syria would put these \u201crebels\u201d\u00a0(as they were called then) in power.<\/p>\n
I\u2019m raising this issue because I think it\u2019s pertinent to last night\u2019s speech. I want to wipe out ISIS. I regard that as a regrettable but necessary action to preserve civilization in the Middle East and stop the spread of violence into Europe, Russia, China, America and Australia.<\/p>\n
I want to know that we\u2019re going to be bombing ISIS, and not destroying the infrastructures of these countries. In more direct terms, bombing, if it doesn\u2019t have the right targets, will not help end ISIS\u2019 reign of terror. In fact it could\u00a0do great harm.<\/p>\n
Notice also the list of regions and countries that I said were menaced by ISIS. I know that looks like a broad swath for what is essentially a gang of murdering extortionists and pirates. But it is clear that ISIS is drawing murderers from the Muslim populations in all these areas. If the nations in question do not formulate more intelligent and self-preserving policies than they have followed up until now, they will most certainly find themselves dealing with this murderous and genocidal savagery on their home soil.<\/p>\n
How does bombing play into that? Is bombing an effective and sufficient response?<\/p>\n
I think that bombing will be an insufficient response unless it is accompanied by policy changes that address the issues of what we are going to do with people who go overseas to murder, rape and practice genocide then try to come back to the USA later. We also need to address the issue of how we are going identify people who are living here in the homeland who are funding and aiding ISIS.<\/p>\n
I also wonder how, or even if, we are going to address the critical issue of who is funding ISIS. In military terms, cutting off funding to ISIS serves the same function as destroying the manufacturing plants of a nation that has actual war making power. It stops their war-making ability. It appears to me that those of us who oppose terrorist activities have been singularly ineffective at stopping the influx of what must be massive amounts of monies to ISIS.<\/p>\n
I wrote two<\/a> posts<\/a> yesterday about a blog post calling for violent discrimination against Muslims. This was a single blog post on an obscure website. However, it is clear that ISIS is using the internet and other forms of communication to recruit what must be large numbers of murderers who are actually following through with the murdering. I\u2019ve read that the videos of our reporters being beheaded will be (probably have been already) used to attract and recruit fresh murderers to this ignoble cause.<\/p>\n How are these calls to murder being channeled through the various communities where likely recruits are found? Is it done entirely by the internet? What part does word of mouth play in this? How are we dealing with\u00a0these web sites?<\/p>\n I\u2019m strongly in favor of freedom of speech. But direct recruitment of murderers to participate in\u00a0the slaughter of innocent people who are then murdered in great numbers by these same recruits goes beyond the limits of what we ordinarily think of as free speech. It is akin to putting a murder for hire ad on the web. How are we going to deal with this?<\/p>\n We need to re-evalulate our laws that pertain to these issues and make the changes that are necessary to protect this country.<\/p>\n I want to think about this before I say more. Right now, what I mostly have are questions. In the meantime, I am interested in what Public Catholic\u2019s readers think. I hope you will think these things through and share your ideas. I also hope that we can get beyond knee-jerk partisan sloganeering.<\/p>\n This is about genocide against Christians and other religious minorities, war that seems to be going on forever, and our domestic safety here in our homeland. Let\u2019s put aside partisan loyalties and think about what is best for our country.<\/p>\n Here, for your consideration, is our president\u2019s address from last night.<\/p>\n