{"id":17557,"date":"2013-09-18T10:18:48","date_gmt":"2013-09-18T14:18:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/?p=17557"},"modified":"2013-09-18T10:18:48","modified_gmt":"2013-09-18T14:18:48","slug":"a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2013\/09\/a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible.html","title":{"rendered":"A More Complicated View of the Bible"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

Fred Clark has posted<\/a> about Evangelical defenders of slavery and what their stance in a bygone era tells us about their approach to the Bible. In the process, he writes:<\/p>\n

The white evangelical opponents of slavery thus adopted a \u201cmore complicated view\u201d because biblical literalism was inadequate \u2014 incapable of offering wisdom, guidance or truth. As an approach to reading the Bible, it was not profitable for doctrine, for reproof or for instruction in righteousness.<\/p>\n

What they required, sought and found, was some way to account for and weigh the competing claims of contradictory proof texts\u2026<\/p>\n

The white evangelical theology of biblical literalism is a device that functions to allow white evangelicals to claim a reverent devotion to biblical literalism while simultaneously refusing even to look at huge chunks and huge themes of the Bible. It is a mechanism that does exactly what it was designed to do: provide an excuse for \u201cneglecting the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faith.\u201d It allowed people like Rice to make a \u201cbiblical\u201d defense of \u201cserving their own interests on their fast day and oppressing all their workers.\u201d It is a tool that is used to defy, deny and disrespect scripture. That\u2019s what it\u2019s\u00a0for<\/em>. That\u2019s why it was so effective as a defense of slavery and later as a defense of segregation \u2014 defending injustice was its intended purpose all along.<\/p>\n

If you love the Bible, you cannot love a theology designed to distort, deform and disrespect it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

A recent post of mine<\/a> on the Bible has also generated a lot of discussion. Some of it came to focus on whether the Bible is of divine origin, whether in whole or in part, and also on the instance when Jesus is reported to have said that Moses gave the law regarding divorce as a concession. Here is what I wrote in a comment<\/a> in that discussion:<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t think that any of the Bible is \u201cfrom God\u201d in the sense that conservatives use that language, as though it were something that can be shown to have originated outside of the minds of the human authors. It may or may not have done, but I don\u2019t think that anyone can demonstrate that it did. And so I treat these texts as the work of ancient human beings directing attention to transcendent realities and values. And I see Jesus in this instance using the Bible in a manner that is in keeping with that \u2013 playing one text off against another, in the interest of protecting women from an approach to divorce that left them extremely vulnerable in this patriarchal society. I follow Jesus\u2019 example in this, not because I can show it to have a supernatural origin, but because I believe it to be a contextual example of doing the right thing, defending the powerless and disenfranchised.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

What unites both these posts is the conviction that a more complicated view of the Bible \u2013 one that rejects inerrancy and acknowledges contradictions \u2013 is required by the Bible itself, as is standing for justice even when there are prooftexts that could be piled up against your stance.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>A good example is one that came up in one of my classes today. We were talking about Plato\u2019s dialogue Euthyphro, and the nature of morality. Students agreed that rape is an example of something that is always wrong, and yet the Bible treats it<\/a> as something that is appropriate in the case of women in a captured enemy city, and a minor offense against the girl\u2019s father that can be rectified by the payment of a fine in a different sort of circumstance.<\/p>\n

Yet all it takes is the Golden Rule \u2013 empathy \u2013 to recognize that just as no one of us would want to be violated by another human being against our will, so no one should violate another human being.<\/p>\n

Principles<\/a> vs. passages<\/a>. It comes down to that time and time again. And the question of whether your use of the Bible is in the interest of justice or a self-serving attempt to maintain your own power, privilege, and possessions.<\/p>\n

On this topic and related<\/a> ones<\/a> around the blogosphere, see also Marc Cortez\u2019s discussion<\/a> of the pathologies of Evangelicalism,\u00a0Defeating the Dragons\u2019<\/a> continuing treatment of fundamentalism, Jeri Massi<\/a> on the fundamentalist use of emotional manipulation, Brian Bibb<\/a> on Bible translation and theological bias,\u00a0Carol Howard Merritt\u2019s decision<\/a> not to use the term \u201cmainline\u201d any longer, Libby Anne\u2019s post<\/a> about Debi Pearl\u2019s response to criticisms,\u00a0Larry Behrendt\u2019s ongoing discussion<\/a> of the distinction between what a text meant and what it means, David Hayward\u2019s cartoon and post<\/a> about Christianity as one religion among many, Lothar Lorraine<\/a> on the inspiration of the Bible and other books, and Unreasonable Faith<\/a> on early Christian fandom.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Fred Clark has posted about Evangelical defenders of slavery and what their stance in a bygone era tells us about their approach to the Bible. In the process, he writes: The white evangelical opponents of slavery thus adopted a \u201cmore complicated view\u201d because biblical literalism was inadequate \u2014 incapable of offering wisdom, guidance or truth. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":136,"featured_media":17568,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,28,39,43,61,67],"tags":[1140,2148,2752,3675,3678,5154,5677,7682,7721,9959,11411],"class_list":["post-17557","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bible","category-genesis-bible","category-historical-jesus","category-inerrancy","category-morality","category-new-testament-bible","tag-bible","tag-conservative","tag-divorce","tag-fundamentalism-religion","tag-fundamentalists","tag-inerrancy","tag-jesus","tag-morality","tag-moses","tag-rape","tag-slavery"],"yoast_head":"\nA More Complicated View of the Bible<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Fred Clark has posted about Evangelical defenders of slavery and what their stance in a bygone era tells us about their approach to the Bible. In the\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2013\/09\/a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A More Complicated View of the Bible\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Fred Clark has posted about Evangelical defenders of slavery and what their stance in a bygone era tells us about their approach to the Bible. In the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2013\/09\/a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Religion Prof: The Blog of James F. McGrath\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/religionprof\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-09-18T14:18:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"James F. McGrath\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ReligionProf\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"James F. McGrath\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2013\/09\/a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2013\/09\/a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible.html\",\"name\":\"A More Complicated View of the Bible\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-09-18T14:18:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-09-18T14:18:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#\/schema\/person\/78342576667b872e3d259c153ce4c5bf\"},\"description\":\"Fred Clark has posted about Evangelical defenders of slavery and what their stance in a bygone era tells us about their approach to the Bible. In the\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2013\/09\/a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2013\/09\/a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2013\/09\/a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A More Complicated View of the Bible\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/\",\"name\":\"Religion Prof: The Blog of James F. McGrath\",\"description\":\"The Blog of Dr. James F. McGrath, Clarence L. Goodwin Chair in New Testament Language and Literature at Butler University, Indianapolis\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#\/schema\/person\/78342576667b872e3d259c153ce4c5bf\",\"name\":\"James F. McGrath\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/88ca096942acd474313f7ef4227a49da?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/88ca096942acd474313f7ef4227a49da?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"James F. McGrath\"},\"description\":\"Clarence L. Goodwin Chair in New Testament Language and Literature at Butler University in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. BD University of London, PhD Durham University. Author of John's Apologetic Christology, The Only True God, Theology and Science Fiction, and The Burial of Jesus, as well as (with Charles Haberl of Rutgers University) the two-volume Mandaean Book of John critical edition, translation, and commentary. Also author of numerous articles (and a few science fiction short stories) and the editor or co-editor of several volumes.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3Ge8ul5\",\"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/religionprof\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/jamesfmcgrath\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/jfmcgrat\/\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ReligionProf\",\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/religionprof\",\"https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/religionprof\",\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/James_F._McGrath\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/author\/james-f-mcgrath\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A More Complicated View of the Bible","description":"Fred Clark has posted about Evangelical defenders of slavery and what their stance in a bygone era tells us about their approach to the Bible. In the","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2013\/09\/a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A More Complicated View of the Bible","og_description":"Fred Clark has posted about Evangelical defenders of slavery and what their stance in a bygone era tells us about their approach to the Bible. In the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2013\/09\/a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible.html","og_site_name":"Religion Prof: The Blog of James F. McGrath","article_author":"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/religionprof\/","article_published_time":"2013-09-18T14:18:48+00:00","author":"James F. McGrath","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ReligionProf","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"James F. McGrath","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2013\/09\/a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2013\/09\/a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible.html","name":"A More Complicated View of the Bible","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-09-18T14:18:48+00:00","dateModified":"2013-09-18T14:18:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#\/schema\/person\/78342576667b872e3d259c153ce4c5bf"},"description":"Fred Clark has posted about Evangelical defenders of slavery and what their stance in a bygone era tells us about their approach to the Bible. In the","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2013\/09\/a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2013\/09\/a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2013\/09\/a-more-complicated-view-of-the-bible.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A More Complicated View of the Bible"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/","name":"Religion Prof: The Blog of James F. McGrath","description":"The Blog of Dr. James F. McGrath, Clarence L. Goodwin Chair in New Testament Language and Literature at Butler University, Indianapolis","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#\/schema\/person\/78342576667b872e3d259c153ce4c5bf","name":"James F. McGrath","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/88ca096942acd474313f7ef4227a49da?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/88ca096942acd474313f7ef4227a49da?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"James F. McGrath"},"description":"Clarence L. Goodwin Chair in New Testament Language and Literature at Butler University in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. BD University of London, PhD Durham University. Author of John's Apologetic Christology, The Only True God, Theology and Science Fiction, and The Burial of Jesus, as well as (with Charles Haberl of Rutgers University) the two-volume Mandaean Book of John critical edition, translation, and commentary. Also author of numerous articles (and a few science fiction short stories) and the editor or co-editor of several volumes.","sameAs":["https:\/\/amzn.to\/3Ge8ul5","http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/religionprof\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/jamesfmcgrath\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/jfmcgrat\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/ReligionProf","http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/religionprof","https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/religionprof","https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/James_F._McGrath"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/author\/james-f-mcgrath"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17557","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/136"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17557"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17557\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17557"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17557"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17557"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}