There have been many discussions<\/a> of the statistics<\/a> and probabilities<\/a> of the conjunctions<\/a> of names found in the excavation from the 1980s. Rarely<\/a>, however, have I seen them take fully into account the discoveries from earlier decades, including ones made in the Talpiot area. The relatively recent one is not the first discovery of its kind, nor are the sensational claims made about it without precedent.<\/p>\n Most people are aware of the discovery of the tomb in the Talpiot suburb of Jerusalem containing an ossuary apparently inscribed with the name Jesus son of Joseph, which was the focus of a documentary not that long ago. Scholars and other well-informed individuals know that the tomb in question was in fact excavated in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":136,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2477","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.badarchaeology.net\/images\/jesus_ossuary.jpg\")
<\/a>I experienced a moment of initial perplexity when I read Andre Parrot\u2019s 1955 book Golgotha and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre<\/a>![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.assoc-amazon.com\/e\/ir?t=jamefmcgrshom-20&l=as2&o=1&a=B001AO5FZ0\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogger.googleusercontent.com\/tracker\/7622297540113836091-2192108538200589338?l=exploringourmatrix.blogspot.com\")