{"id":27317,"date":"2014-12-10T11:31:38","date_gmt":"2014-12-10T16:31:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/exploringourmatrix\/?p=27317"},"modified":"2014-12-10T11:31:38","modified_gmt":"2014-12-10T16:31:38","slug":"exegesis-as-reading","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2014\/12\/exegesis-as-reading.html","title":{"rendered":"Exegesis as Reading"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

The Patrologist recently blogged about exegesis as reading<\/a>, warning about\u00a0two extremes \u2013 the tendency to falsely claim to be merely reading and not interpreting, and the tendency to atomize and miss the big picture. Here\u2019s the conclusion:<\/p>\n

I am constantly amazed to interact with so called \u2018critical scholars\u2019 who look at, say, a book like John\u2019s Gospel and see nothing but a pastiche of cut-up pieces that represent a proto-Gnostic text re-edited by a proto-Orthodox edited then re-edited again. Why do they see only that? It\u2019s because they analyse a painting by looking at each blob of paint from a stroke of the brush and consider it a different source. They never step back and see the artistry. Whether they are right or wrong is irrelevant to the fact that they can\u2019t step back and look at the whole, can\u2019t discuss the meaning of the book, can\u2019t discuss themes, genre, art, motifs. Because they can\u2019t decide which of 400 types of genitives the proto-Gnostic redactor meant, and their competency in the language is like a tourist who got off the plane with an antique reference grammar of the language and nothing else.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Of related interest, Fred Clark<\/a> (continuing his series on\u00a0Nicolae: The Rise of Antichrist<\/em>) writes about Tim LaHaye\u2019s\u00a0approach to the New Testament:<\/p>\n

\n

LaHaye insists he reads the Bible \u201cliterally,\u201d but his literal interpretation always takes a lot of work because it\u2019s a literal reading of the text in support of an idea that literally can\u2019t be found within its pages \u2014 the idea that it\u2019s mainly about a series of events that won\u2019t take place until 2,000+ years later.<\/p>\n

Consider, for example, Tim LaHaye\u2019s idea that the future Antichrist will desecrate and then destroy the Temple in Jerusalem. That\u2019s a problem because there hasn\u2019t been a Temple in Jerusalem for more than 1,900 years. So in order to \u201cliterally\u201d interpret every biblical reference to the destruction of the Temple as a prediction of the distant future, LaHaye has to add something the Bible itself doesn\u2019t say. He has to look between the lines to find, or to invent, an implicit, hidden prophecy that the Temple in Jerusalem will one day in the future be rebuilt in order that a coming Antichrist will, one day in the future, have the opportunity to desecrate and destroy it all over again.<\/p>\n

This is all based on a bunch of passages that refer to the destruction of the Temple. Those passages \u2014 wrested\u00a0mainly from Daniel and from the Gospels\u00a0\u2013 seem to refer to the actual desecration and destruction of the actual Temple, a literal event that has already literally occurred,\u00a0twice<\/em>, in actual history.<\/p>\n

Outside the confines of Tim LaHaye\u2019s \u201cBible prophecy\u201d mystery cult, there\u2019s a fascinating argument about those biblical passages. Some argue that they were \u201cprophetic\u201d in the modern, predictive sense of the word \u2014 meaning that they were written\u00a0before<\/em>\u00a0the destruction of the first and second temples by inspired writers who foresaw and foretold the events that thereafter came to pass. Others, a bit more convincingly, argue that these passages were written\u00a0after<\/em>\u00a0those events in an effort to discern the theological meaning of those calamities.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s why 70 CE is such an important date in biblical studies. That was the year in which Roman soldiers under Emperor Titus destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple \u2014 an overwhelming, world-changing event for first-century Jews and Christians. The earliest New Testament texts, the epistles of Paul, were written before that event and don\u2019t mention it at all. But later texts, such as the Gospel of Matthew, include many references to the Temple\u2019s destruction. That leads most scholars to argue that Matthew was written some time\u00a0after<\/em>\u00a070 CE, while some others argue that it was written earlier and that its references to the events of 70 CE were \u201cprophetic\u201d\u00a0predictions<\/em>\u00a0of the horrors that were about to occur.<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re into that kind of thing, that dispute really is fascinating, but my main point here is that\u00a0both<\/em>\u00a0sides of that argument disagree with the odd belief taught here in the Left Behind books, which is that the actual destruction of the actual Temple in Jerusalem that actually happened in 70 CEhas nothing to do with<\/em>\u00a0the Gospel texts that allude to the Temple\u2019s destruction. Those texts, Tim LaHaye says, aren\u2019t about the Temple that Jesus walked in and that Titus\u2019 troops destroyed. Those texts are, instead, about a future Temple, one that hadn\u2019t even been built yet and that, today, in 2014, still has not yet been built. For LaHaye, when Jesus spoke of the Temple, he didn\u2019t mean the actual Temple there in Jerusalem in whose actual shadow he was actually standing. He meant some future Temple that would be built on the same site 2,000 or so years in the future.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s a pretty wild assertion, and it only gets wilder when LaHaye attempts to justify it as a \u201cliteral\u201d reading of the text.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Click through<\/a> to read the rest, which is full of Fred\u2019s usual wit.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"grumpy<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Patrologist recently blogged about exegesis as reading, warning about\u00a0two extremes \u2013 the tendency to falsely claim to be merely reading and not interpreting, and the tendency to atomize and miss the big picture. Here\u2019s the conclusion: I am constantly amazed to interact with so called \u2018critical scholars\u2019 who look at, say, a book like […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":136,"featured_media":11871,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,142],"tags":[684,2637,3245,3592,5669,6621,9642,10008,12356,12609],"class_list":["post-27317","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bible","category-greek-languages","tag-antichrist","tag-destruction","tag-exegesis","tag-fred-clark","tag-jerusalem","tag-literalism","tag-prophecy","tag-reading","tag-temple","tag-tim-lahaye"],"yoast_head":"\nExegesis as Reading<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Patrologist recently blogged about exegesis as reading, warning about\u00a0two extremes - the tendency to falsely claim to be merely reading and not\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2014\/12\/exegesis-as-reading.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Exegesis as Reading\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Patrologist recently blogged about exegesis as reading, warning about\u00a0two extremes - the tendency to falsely claim to be merely reading and not\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2014\/12\/exegesis-as-reading.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Religion Prof: The Blog of James F. McGrath\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/religionprof\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-12-10T16:31:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"James F. McGrath\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ReligionProf\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"James F. McGrath\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2014\/12\/exegesis-as-reading.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2014\/12\/exegesis-as-reading.html\",\"name\":\"Exegesis as Reading\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2014-12-10T16:31:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-10T16:31:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#\/schema\/person\/78342576667b872e3d259c153ce4c5bf\"},\"description\":\"The Patrologist recently blogged about exegesis as reading, warning about\u00a0two extremes - the tendency to falsely claim to be merely reading and not\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2014\/12\/exegesis-as-reading.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2014\/12\/exegesis-as-reading.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2014\/12\/exegesis-as-reading.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Exegesis as Reading\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/\",\"name\":\"Religion Prof: The Blog of James F. McGrath\",\"description\":\"The Blog of Dr. James F. McGrath, Clarence L. Goodwin Chair in New Testament Language and Literature at Butler University, Indianapolis\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#\/schema\/person\/78342576667b872e3d259c153ce4c5bf\",\"name\":\"James F. McGrath\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/88ca096942acd474313f7ef4227a49da?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/88ca096942acd474313f7ef4227a49da?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"James F. McGrath\"},\"description\":\"Clarence L. Goodwin Chair in New Testament Language and Literature at Butler University in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. BD University of London, PhD Durham University. Author of John's Apologetic Christology, The Only True God, Theology and Science Fiction, and The Burial of Jesus, as well as (with Charles Haberl of Rutgers University) the two-volume Mandaean Book of John critical edition, translation, and commentary. Also author of numerous articles (and a few science fiction short stories) and the editor or co-editor of several volumes.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3Ge8ul5\",\"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/religionprof\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/jamesfmcgrath\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/jfmcgrat\/\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ReligionProf\",\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/religionprof\",\"https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/religionprof\",\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/James_F._McGrath\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/author\/james-f-mcgrath\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Exegesis as Reading","description":"The Patrologist recently blogged about exegesis as reading, warning about\u00a0two extremes - the tendency to falsely claim to be merely reading and not","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2014\/12\/exegesis-as-reading.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Exegesis as Reading","og_description":"The Patrologist recently blogged about exegesis as reading, warning about\u00a0two extremes - the tendency to falsely claim to be merely reading and not","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2014\/12\/exegesis-as-reading.html","og_site_name":"Religion Prof: The Blog of James F. McGrath","article_author":"http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/religionprof\/","article_published_time":"2014-12-10T16:31:38+00:00","author":"James F. McGrath","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ReligionProf","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"James F. McGrath","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2014\/12\/exegesis-as-reading.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2014\/12\/exegesis-as-reading.html","name":"Exegesis as Reading","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#website"},"datePublished":"2014-12-10T16:31:38+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-10T16:31:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#\/schema\/person\/78342576667b872e3d259c153ce4c5bf"},"description":"The Patrologist recently blogged about exegesis as reading, warning about\u00a0two extremes - the tendency to falsely claim to be merely reading and not","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2014\/12\/exegesis-as-reading.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2014\/12\/exegesis-as-reading.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/2014\/12\/exegesis-as-reading.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Exegesis as Reading"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/","name":"Religion Prof: The Blog of James F. McGrath","description":"The Blog of Dr. James F. McGrath, Clarence L. Goodwin Chair in New Testament Language and Literature at Butler University, Indianapolis","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#\/schema\/person\/78342576667b872e3d259c153ce4c5bf","name":"James F. McGrath","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/88ca096942acd474313f7ef4227a49da?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/88ca096942acd474313f7ef4227a49da?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"James F. McGrath"},"description":"Clarence L. Goodwin Chair in New Testament Language and Literature at Butler University in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. BD University of London, PhD Durham University. Author of John's Apologetic Christology, The Only True God, Theology and Science Fiction, and The Burial of Jesus, as well as (with Charles Haberl of Rutgers University) the two-volume Mandaean Book of John critical edition, translation, and commentary. Also author of numerous articles (and a few science fiction short stories) and the editor or co-editor of several volumes.","sameAs":["https:\/\/amzn.to\/3Ge8ul5","http:\/\/www.facebook.com\/religionprof\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/jamesfmcgrath\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/jfmcgrat\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/ReligionProf","http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/religionprof","https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/religionprof","https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/James_F._McGrath"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/author\/james-f-mcgrath"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27317","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/136"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27317"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27317\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27317"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27317"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/religionprof\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27317"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}