On his personal blog, Mark Goodacre<\/a> laments the fact that Bionic Woman (unlike its 1970s predecessor) is not a family show. The same can be said of the re-created Battlestar Galactica. I am somewhat torn myself \u2013 on the one hand, a series that is not even trying to be kid-friendly can explore subjects and go places that would otherwise be off limits. On the other hand, I fear for the next generation if there are no serious science fiction shows that kids can watch too. On a related note, in my class on the Bible yesterday we discussed whether familiar Bible stories such as David and Goliath or Samson, and indeed the Bible in general, are child-friendly or appropriate for young audiences. Certainly editing is required to make them G-rated<\/a> \u2013 and you\u2019ll want to keep them away from Judges 19 altogether until they are adults.<\/p>\n Let me conclude by just saying I like one of David Eick\u2019s<\/a> hallmarks, the subtle tribute to the original series that he is remaking. I wonder how many people noticed that a helicopter was used during the first high-speed chase scene precisely because it allowed one to hear a sound as Jamie was running that paralleled the sound effect whenever bionics were used in the original series. Eick has shown through Battlestar Galactica that he makes serious television shows that address serious issues about our values in general, and not just about technology and ethics. After the first miniseries of BSG, some were still unconvinced. But hopefully the character of that other series as it progressed will be enough to draw viewers back to Bionic Woman<\/a> and give it time to develop and show us what it can do. I for one am hopefully that we can look forward to bionically-enhanced television at its best!<\/p>\n There is much more to be said about the new series Bionic Woman (which should, perhaps, be called \u201cBionic Women\u201d in the plural, since it features two main characters who are bionically enhanced females). In the scene where Jamie and Will have sex, at one point she says \u201cThat\u2019s not me\u201d. We needn\u2019t speculate as […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":136,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4242","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogger.googleusercontent.com\/tracker\/7622297540113836091-3634996556637048867?l=exploringourmatrix.blogspot.com\")