I have consistently been one of those who said that all questions are worth asking, and should be welcomed, when others have tried to ignore questions that were felt to be too awkward, and silence those who dared to ask them.<\/p>\n
But I didn\u2019t feel that was actually true in all instances. I thought some questions were simply unanswerable and that that meant that we weren\u2019t meant to ask them.<\/p>\n
One such question was the classic one about John 8: What did Jesus write on the ground?<\/p>\n
Lately I have had a change of heart, and have begun to think that the Gospels were intended as memory aids for early Christian storytellers, who were supposed to expect questions and left loose ends and tantalizing puzzles in their stories precisely in order to elicit a response.<\/p>\n
And so even if we cannot definitively answer the question \u201cWhat did Jesus write in the dirt?\u201d I think we are supposed to ask it, and to ask why he was writing in the dirt in the first place. It may be that the number of possible answers would not have been viewed as a problem in ancient times the way it is today, when people look for the definitive sole correct answer to any question. In some cases the loose ends may have been less of an invitation to an audience to ask for more details, a sort of test that they are paying attention, and more of an invitation to listeners to participate in the story: what do you think he was writing?<\/p>\n
I am not sure that I have found \u201cthe\u201d answer. But I have had many interesting thoughts and insights because I have allowed myself and even forced myself to ask the question. Once again, I won\u2019t share those here but will keep you in suspense, because I presume that\u2019s what authors are expected by publishers to do.<\/p>\n
According to Lesley Hazleton, in her audiobook<\/a> I had been listening to in the car (Lesley Hazleton, The First Muslim: The Story of Muhammad<\/i><\/a>, p. 55), a version of the story \u201cstill current in today\u2019s Middle East, had him physically protecting the woman by shielding her with his body and adding two crucial words: \u201cLet he who is without sin cast the first stone at me.\u201d\u201d Had you come across that before? Can anyone recommend where to look to find this in Middle Eastern sources, whether ancient or modern?<\/p>\n I\u2019ll also explore the possibility that the woman who is the center of this story may have been a young girl, betrothed to be married, who is a victim of rape\/molestation<\/a>\u00a0and who, as a result, has become pregnant<\/a>, leading to the scene that unfolds in John 8. Are those narrative\/historical possibilities for understanding the story that you\u2019ve heard mentioned before, or thought of yourself?<\/p>\n Also on this topic, there was a fair amount of attention to this story a while back, as a number of media outlets picked up on what ought to be common knowledge, namely that (as\u00a0The Daily Beast<\/em> put it) \u201cOne of Jesus\u2019 Most Famous Lines Wasn\u2019t in the Original Gospels.\u201d See also:<\/p>\n Candida Moss on the absence of the story from our earliest manuscripts<\/a>.<\/p>\n The Story of the Story of the Adulterous\u00a0Woman<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n