{"id":319,"date":"2014-11-06T15:11:00","date_gmt":"2014-11-06T15:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html"},"modified":"2014-11-06T15:11:00","modified_gmt":"2014-11-06T15:11:00","slug":"was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html","title":{"rendered":"Was God Around for Michael Brown? A Humanist Perspective on Ferguson"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

by Katherine Whitfield<\/a>
R3 Contributor<\/span><\/p>\n

Follow Katherine on Twitter <\/span>@curlyheff<\/a><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span>\n
<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n
Humanism is roughly defined as a belief system that assigns primary importance to human, rather than divine or supernatural, matters. Tenets of humanism emphasize the inherent potential for human good, the common ground shared among all human beings and the need for solutions to human problems based solely on rational possibilities, not divine interventions. In his chapter titled\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n

\u201cHumanism in African American Theology,\u201d religious studies professor and formative humanist Anthony B. Pinn spends less time explaining the function of humanism within a theological context than on establishing a foundation for what humanism is not. Namely, humanism is not, at its core, an extension of the black church tradition nor of the Christ Event, despite its overlap with African American theology\u2019s emphasis on liberation from racism and oppression (\u201cHumanism\u201d 280). Pinn posits African American humanist theology as promoting a study of people \u201cgrounded not in imago Dei but rather in science and culture\u201d (\u201cHumanism\u201d 288). Essentially, Pinn advocates for a \u201cslice of life\u201d theology, suggesting that everything we do and feel, as humans, is source material in our search to infuse our lives with purpose. Put simply, God-centric religion does not have the market cornered on meaningful existence. \n

Creating a connection between humanism, as an overarching concept, and the events in Ferguson, Mo., since the shooting of Michael Brown did not prove difficult. To quote Pinn\u2019s thoughts about the functional ultimacy, or radical autonomy, of humans, \u201cpeople act in the world, and these actions have ongoing meaning and consequence that is not overridden by divine maneuvers\u201d (\u201cHumanism\u201d 285). Most certainly, the actions that transpired on Aug. 9 on Canfield Drive were not overridden by divine maneuvers. Mike Brown and his friend, Dorian Johnson, were not urged on to the sidewalk by an unseen guiding force. Officer Darren Wilson did not act upon an inexplicable sense to drive a different route that afternoon. Brown and Wilson collided and Mike Brown died, and the pair\u2019s encounter has far-reaching meaning and consequence that is firmly rooted outside the religious world in the social and political contexts. If there are those who might argue that Brown\u2019s death was divinely ordained, or even orchestrated \u2013 a necessary evil to serve as the tipping point to usher in the next movement for human rights \u2013 then I find myself tightly aligned with both the humanist and womanist schools of thought, seeking distance from any theology that currently requires the death of one for the life of many. <\/p>\n

For most womanist theologians, that price was effectively paid by way of the Christ Event; injustice and suffering hold no place in God\u2019s divine plan. Founding womanist theologian Delores Williams argues that \u201cthere is nothing divine in the blood of the Cross\u201d (167). According to Williams, the death of Christ is not an endorsement of surrogacy, but rather a demonstration of the human capacity for wrongdoing. From the humanist perspective, Pinn maintains that the resolution of evil requires \u201can appeal to human accountability. Humans have created the problems presently encountered and humans are responsible for changing those conditions\u201d (Murphy 219). Brown\u2019s death, viewed through a humanist lens, is a harsh reality effected at the hands of manmade and flawed power structures. A humanist response to Ferguson focuses not on prayer and restoration through divine grace and healing, but on an appeal to the broken social systems whose faulty infrastructure allows for the permissive and fairly routine killing of black citizens. Pinn speaks at greater length about these disproportionate power structures in his book African American Humanist Principles, highlighting racial profiling as a particular threat to black citizenship. He writes, \u201cAn understanding of power as the ability to fix another\u2019s identity should include an awareness of racial profiling as another mode of power through which black Americans have been overdetermined and fixed\u201d (Humanist Principles 80). Statistics overwhelmingly suggest that if all circumstances in the Michael Brown shooting had been identical, save for the color of Brown\u2019s skin, a white Michael Brown would still be alive today. Humans, not the divine, appear to be writing the rules and holding the keys to the kingdom these days, and so it is a change within humans that is necessary.<\/p>\n

As such, Pinn calls for a radical paradigm shift, challenging the academic community to envision a theology devoid of God at its core \u2013 one that asserts humanism as its own form of religion and allows for the positioning of its theology \u201cas the description and interrogation of human stories of meaning making\u201d (\u201cHumanism\u201d 288). While the concept of a nontheistic theology seems to teeter on the brink of a semantical breakdown, I appreciate Pinn\u2019s assertion that labeling humanism in this manner might \u201cpush beyond narrow understandings that seek to privilege theology as a mode of discourse and to disassociate it from other methodologies for studying human experience\u201d (\u201cHumanism\u201d 288). Indeed, Pinn\u2019s desire to strip certain belief structures down to their roots and reexamine what is necessary and just to create the ultimate lived black experience aligns with the call, in the wake of Ferguson, for a paradigm shift in how young black men are viewed in our society as compared to their white counterparts. Immediately following the shooting by cop of an unarmed black teen, ensuing debates about Brown\u2019s potential gang affiliations, alleged wrongdoing prior to his shooting and other efforts to defame his personal character emerged as thinly-veiled attempts to plant seeds of justification for the shooting in the court of public opinion. \u201cArguing whether Brown was a good kid or not is functionally arguing over whether he specifically deserved to die, a way of acknowledging that some black men ought to be executed,\u201d writes Deadspin staff writer Greg Howard. \u201cTo even acknowledge this line of debate is to start a larger argument about the worth, the very personhood, of a black man in America.\u201d Howard\u2019s assertion serves to emphasize the inherent worth of all human beings \u2013 a truth that stands in stark contrast to the reception and treatment of black citizens, particularly men, throughout the country.<\/p>\n

In contrast to Howard\u2019s humanistic acknowledgments, St. Louis minister and professor Christopher Grundy, in a recent open letter to the Ferguson police force, says, \u201cThe conflict itself, day after day, can cause us \u2013 can cause you \u2013 to lose sight of the flame of the holy in each of [the African American youth who are leading this movement].\u201d The problem with Grundy\u2019s statement is its theologically based assumption that all members of the white infrastructure
\n share his belief that the flame of the holy is even present in the black body. Grundy operates from the perspective of one who believes Christian principles can serve as a unifying force to offset the dehumanization of both the black youth and the hyper-militarized officers. However, his notion that one human being should treat another well because the flame of God exists in each of us detracts from the more basic truth that one human should treat another human well simply because it is the right thing to do. In this case, religion serves almost as a distraction from the real matter at hand.<\/p>\n

Pinn does not believe that African American humanism is a rejection of the commonly held African American tradition. Rather, he upholds that humanism \u201cis an underappreciated but nonetheless vital dimension of this tradition\u201d (\u201cHumanism\u201d 282-3). Considering the legacy of the African American tradition, I find myself wondering, how often (if ever) has the placement of God and Christ at the center stood in the way of true social progress or blinded African Americans to the real dangers \u2013 and opportunities \u2013 at hand? Drawing a biblical comparison, one could question whether, when the Babylonians destroyed the temple, razed Jerusalem and exiled nearly 5,000 Judeans to a foreign land, the Judeans\u2019 expressed beliefs as God\u2019s chosen people \u2013 that God had punished them and God would save them \u2013 stood in the way of their ability to formulate more creative or empowered solutions toward their own liberation? Perhaps the profound emphasis on God\u2019s all-consuming power has fostered a \u201cwait and hope\u201d or \u201cwill of God\u201d theology that is depriving those who are oppressed of immediate and deserved access to freedom and a better life. In a contemporary setting, one could argue that an overdependence on divine agency is helping to sustain isolating and misguided notions that breast cancer is a stigma or a punishment from God; that severely disproportionate distribution of wealth aligns with approved biblical social structures; or that the shooting of an unarmed teenager by a figure of authority is an acceptable, or at least unavoidable, part of the divine status quo. <\/p>\n

Religion professor Kelly Brown Douglas seems to ask the ultimate question: \u201cWhat is it about Christianity that has allowed it to be both a bane and a blessing for black people?\u201d (Pinn, \u201cHumanism\u201d 285). Black theology\u2019s extreme dependence on a \u201chermeneutic of revelation\u201d (Pinn, \u201cHumanism\u201d 286) is not only overshadowing humanism\u2019s contribution to the field, but may potentially serve as a stumbling block for African Americans whose faith in God\u2019s divine agency is depriving them of their own. For African Americans who find the deck continually stacked against them, faith in God cannot be perpetually leaned upon as the only source of solace. Such a one-way faith conversation borders on the verge of an antihuman theology \u2013 one that favors divine dealings at the expense of the human experience with regard to suffering and evil. Current realities of the black experience in America suggest that the onus is now on the human, not solely the divine, to effect and sustain just and liberative change.<\/p><\/span>\n


<\/span><\/div>\n


<\/span><\/p>\n

Works Cited<\/span><\/b><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

Grundy, Christopher. \u201cA Pastoral Letter to Members of the Ferguson, Missouri Police Force.\u201d A More Peaceful Table 15 Oct. 2014: n. pag. Web. 26 Oct. 2014. <\/span><\/p>\n

Howard, Greg. \u201cAmerica is Not for Black People.\u201d The Concourse: Deadspin 12 Aug. 2014: n. pag. Web. 3 Sept. 2014. <\/p>\n

Murphy, Larry G. \u201cEvil and Sin in African American Theology.\u201d The Oxford Handbook of African American Theology. Ed. Katie G. Cannon and Anthony B. Pinn. New York: Oxford UP, 2014. 212-227. Print. <\/p>\n

Pinn, Anthony B. African American Humanist Principles: Living and Thinking Like the Children of Nimrod. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. Print. <\/p>\n

\u2014. \u201cHumanism in African American Theology.\u201d The Oxford Handbook of African American Theology. Ed. Katie G. Cannon and Anthony B. Pinn. New York: Oxford UP, 2014. 280-291. Print. <\/p>\n

Williams, Delores S. Sisters in the Wilderness: The Challenge of Womanist God-Talk. New York: Orbis Books, 1993. Print. <\/p>\n

<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Katherine WhitfieldR3 Contributor Follow Katherine on Twitter @curlyheff Humanism is roughly defined as a belief system that assigns primary importance to human, rather than divine or supernatural, matters. Tenets of humanism emphasize the inherent potential for human good, the common ground shared among all human beings and the need for solutions to human problems […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-319","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nWas God Around for Michael Brown? A Humanist Perspective on Ferguson<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"by Katherine WhitfieldR3 ContributorFollow Katherine on Twitter @curlyheffHumanism is roughly defined as a belief system that assigns primary importance\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Was God Around for Michael Brown? A Humanist Perspective on Ferguson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"by Katherine WhitfieldR3 ContributorFollow Katherine on Twitter @curlyheffHumanism is roughly defined as a belief system that assigns primary importance\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rhetoric Race and Religion\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-11-06T15:11:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Guest Contributor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Guest Contributor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html\",\"name\":\"Was God Around for Michael Brown? A Humanist Perspective on Ferguson\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2014-11-06T15:11:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-06T15:11:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/#\/schema\/person\/2869b699bf0e57982cb1f212243705f2\"},\"description\":\"by Katherine WhitfieldR3 ContributorFollow Katherine on Twitter @curlyheffHumanism is roughly defined as a belief system that assigns primary importance\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Was God Around for Michael Brown? A Humanist Perspective on Ferguson\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/\",\"name\":\"Rhetoric Race and Religion\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/#\/schema\/person\/2869b699bf0e57982cb1f212243705f2\",\"name\":\"Guest Contributor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5010a3cc274cdb37811bf24de46dc280?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5010a3cc274cdb37811bf24de46dc280?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Guest Contributor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/author\/admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Was God Around for Michael Brown? A Humanist Perspective on Ferguson","description":"by Katherine WhitfieldR3 ContributorFollow Katherine on Twitter @curlyheffHumanism is roughly defined as a belief system that assigns primary importance","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Was God Around for Michael Brown? A Humanist Perspective on Ferguson","og_description":"by Katherine WhitfieldR3 ContributorFollow Katherine on Twitter @curlyheffHumanism is roughly defined as a belief system that assigns primary importance","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html","og_site_name":"Rhetoric Race and Religion","article_published_time":"2014-11-06T15:11:00+00:00","author":"Guest Contributor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Guest Contributor","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html","name":"Was God Around for Michael Brown? A Humanist Perspective on Ferguson","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/#website"},"datePublished":"2014-11-06T15:11:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-06T15:11:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/#\/schema\/person\/2869b699bf0e57982cb1f212243705f2"},"description":"by Katherine WhitfieldR3 ContributorFollow Katherine on Twitter @curlyheffHumanism is roughly defined as a belief system that assigns primary importance","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/2014\/11\/was-god-around-for-michael-brown-a-humanist-perspective-on-ferguson.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Was God Around for Michael Brown? A Humanist Perspective on Ferguson"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/","name":"Rhetoric Race and Religion","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/#\/schema\/person\/2869b699bf0e57982cb1f212243705f2","name":"Guest Contributor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5010a3cc274cdb37811bf24de46dc280?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5010a3cc274cdb37811bf24de46dc280?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Guest Contributor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/author\/admin"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=319"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/319\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/rhetoricraceandreligion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}