The crisis of the mainline Christian denominations has come about in large part because they hang on to a model of engagement with contemporary people that is no longer adequate. Pastors and church leaders who were taught to interpret the gospel so that it is relevant to the contemporary situation are finding this isn\u2019t adequate to engage our society. Because our problem isn\u2019t just making the gospel relevant, it is making the gospel comprehensible.<\/p>\n
In a previous blog I argued that dialogue is essential to evangelism because it was a witness of Christ\u2019s commitment to life within a pluralistic society. For the Christian this dialogue also fosters a critical skill \u2013 translation. We must learn to speak about our faith to those with whom we have little or no common language.<\/p>\n
An increasingly large portion of Americans do not understand either the basic language of Christianity or the conceptual framework within which it expresses its understanding of humanity in relationship to God. Indeed, they don\u2019t understand the concept denoted by the word \u201cGod,\u201d much less those denoted by the words \u201csin,\u201d \u201catonement,\u201d \u201cgrace,\u201d and \u201clove.\u201d This isn\u2019t merely because people have become \u201cde-churched.\u201d We are post-Christian in world-view, not just affiliation.<\/p>\n
The Christian community needs to understand that it engages an American society that has almost as little in common with a Christian understanding of the world as a indigenous Papuan or Amazonian. Put another way, we should be engaged in cross-cultural mission. Not just because there are so few Christians, but because those who are not Christians represent a different culture, worldview, and language from that of the church. The fact that we mostly speak English simply hides this fact.<\/p>\n
From one perspective there have always been three types of religious leader. Let us call them pastors, chaplains and missionaries. Pastors care for a Christian congregation in a Christian society. Chaplains care for those who have carried their old Christian culture into a new social location. Missionaries seek to learn a new culture and its language so that, in partnership with persons native to that language and culture, they can discover what it means that God had come into our world in Jesus Christ.<\/p>\n
The classical pastorate is almost done with in our post-Christian society. There remains a need in our churches for chaplains. We have a large number of people whose lives have carried them into this new America even as they live in the old culture and its language. But chaplains are, of necessity, a vanishing breed.<\/p>\n
Nor will the pastors and chaplain\u2019s ministry be renewed by the entrepreneurs who try to capture the local born children of the old colonials through re-branding and marketing the old religion. There may well emerge a new generation of Christians from these children, but stirring some warm nostalgia for the language of a half-forgotten past isn\u2019t going to move us into the future. Apart from creating an enduring cultural ghetto these pastor\/chaplain-entrepreneurs will lose the grandchildren.<\/p>\n
The future of Christianity will be created by missionaries, men and women who do not merely interpret, but learn to translate the gospel.<\/p>\n
A missionary knows that the symbol systems of orthodoxy, the structures of its community life, and its understanding of the human situation are all culturally located and therefore limited in their capacity to communicate in a different cultural situation. The missionary knows that awareness of his or her own culture and the ways it is different from other cultures make translation of every aspect of the Christian message and life necessary from the outset.<\/p>\n
This means that the missionary is prepared first and foremost to observe difference, learn new languages, and work in partnership across cultures to shape not only how the gospel is expressed in language and behavior, but how it is shaped into community as well.<\/p>\n
The missionary isn\u2019t looking for new markets for a religious product that is rapidly reaching its sell-by date back home. The missionary is looking for where God\u2019s love is already present in a society and the ways to bring that presence into full, self-conscious realization by telling of God\u2019s love incarnate in Jesus Christ. The missionary knows that he or she has nothing to sell and nothing to offer except a willingness to join the search for the Spirit of Christ in this or that particular place, this or that particular time. The missionary is neither a chaplain nor an entrepreneur. The missionary is a seeker showing other seekers where she has found truth.<\/p>\n
And the role of tradition and its symbols? To come.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The crisis of the mainline Christian denominations has come about in large part because they hang on to a model of engagement with contemporary people that is no longer adequate. Pastors and church leaders who were taught to interpret the gospel so that it is relevant to the contemporary situation are finding this isn\u2019t adequate […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":965,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-557","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-christian-identity"],"yoast_head":"\n