Picking up where the previous post left off:<\/p>\n
So what\u2019s the alternative? What is \u201cChristian humanism?\u201d Let me begin with Scripture. Psalm 8\u2014the biblical charter of Christian humanism. Speaking to God the Psalmist cries<\/p>\n
When I look at your heavens, the work of your fingers,<\/p>\n
the moon and the stars that you have established;<\/p>\n
what are human beings that you are mindful of them,<\/p>\n
mortals that you care for them?<\/p>\n
Yet you have made them a little lower than God,<\/p>\n
And crowned them with glory and honor.<\/p>\n
You have given them dominion over the works of your hands;<\/p>\n
you have put all things under their feet\u2026<\/p>\n
Pond scum? Shit? A disease on the face of the earth? Totally depraved? Having no purpose in life except to glorify God to the exclusion of any sheer \u201cjoy of life\u201d in creativity? Not according to this Psalm.<\/p>\n
Sure, we can\u2019t ignore another Psalm\u201414:<\/p>\n
The Lord looks down from heaven on humankind<\/p>\n
to see if there are any who are wise,<\/p>\n
who seek after God.<\/p>\n
They have all gone astray, they are all alike perverse;<\/p>\n
there is no one who does good,<\/p>\n
no, not one.<\/p>\n
Throughout history Christian thinkers have tended to emphasize one biblical truth about humanity or the other. Either we are essentially good or essentially evil; either noble or corrupt. Finding the right balance has always been difficult and rare. The current trend is to demean humanity by proclaiming an inflated doctrine of total depravity. I attended a service of worship at a church pastored by one of the leading gurus of the young, restless, Reformed movement. His sermon that morning began by extolling the worth and value of human beings. He told his congregation (and those listening to his sermon by podcast) that when they walk in the mall, every person they see has infinite worth and dignity, value and meaning by virtue of being created in God\u2019s own image and likeness. After building up human persons for at least five, maybe ten minutes, the pastor waited during a pregnant pause, letting that sink in, then said \u201cBut they\u2019re all dead.\u201d<\/p>\n
My point is not to contradict the Reformed pastor who has been such an inspiration to so many young people through his sermons and books; it is rather to say that he left unclear how we are to regard fellow human beings. And that is especially the case when we consider that he, like so many evangelicals today, believes and teaches that God only loves some<\/em> of those walking dead people and intends to save only some<\/em> of them unilaterally. In fact, Christ only died for some of them\u2014and really not for any of them so much as for God. Christ, the pastor teaches, died only for the elect and even for them only secondarily. In God\u2019s-God-centeredness, he says, he sent Christ to die to vindicate his own righteousness. God loves his own glory first and foremost and sinners (only some, mind you) only second.<\/p>\n On the other hand, some Christian pastors and thinkers come down at the other extreme, proposing that God is love without power or glory. In process theology, God\u2019s own chief end is humanity\u2019s well-being. Instead of \u201cMan proposes but God disposes,\u201d it\u2019s \u201cGod proposes but man disposes.\u201d God is at the mercy of humanity to either enrich him by achieving his aims or to impoverish him by rejecting them.<\/p>\n There we have two poles between which passionate Christians, many of them young and restless, dissatisfied with casual, non-thinking Christianity, divide. Many in the so-called \u201cemerging church movement\u201d gravitate toward the \u201ckinder, gentler God\u201d without glory or power and many in the Young, Restless, Reformed movement trend toward the God whose glory and power overwhelm human persons, turning them into instruments for his own glory. The first pole tends to elevate humans to godlike status, almost replacing God with humanity. The second pole tends to reduce humans to objects, instruments, pawns in God\u2019s great game of self-glorification. The first pole takes Psalm 8 very seriously while ignoring Psalm 14; the second takes Psalm 14 ultimately seriously while ignoring Psalm 8.<\/p>\n One person who got it pretty much right was the French Catholic Christian thinker, mathematician, philosopher, defender of the faith Blaise Pascal who, in his Pensees<\/em>, or \u201cThoughts,\u201d said that \u201cMan is a king sitting on a crumbling throne holding a broken scepter.\u201d In other words, human beings are damaged goods. \u201cMan,\u201d Pascal wrote, \u201cis neither angel nor brute.\u201d And \u201cMan is a reed, but a thinking reed.\u201d (A \u201creed\u201d is fragile and insignificant, blown and even broken by the wind.) All that is to say that human beings are damaged goods.<\/p>\n But my main message to you is that in spite of the damage, human beings are nevertheless good and valuable and capable of great things\u2014including, by the grace of God, satisfying God.<\/p>\n Some Christian thinkers will call my message humanistic. I accept that, so long as \u201cChristian\u201d qualifies \u201chumanistic.\u201d I believe at the heart of the biblical message is a very humanistic truth\u2014that God\u2019s human creatures exist for something more than God\u2019s glory; we exist for God\u2019s satisfaction and enjoyment. While it is true that our greatest satisfaction is found in glorifying God, it is also true that God\u2019s greatest satisfaction is found in glorifying us<\/em>.<\/p>\n There are two very different perspectives on why God created the world and especially human beings, free creatures, created in his own image and likeness, in it. It\u2019s helpful to get these two perspectives in focus by looking briefly at two theologians who stand at the source of modern evangelical Christianity\u2014Jonathan Edwards and John Wesley\u2014both born in 1703 and both highly regarded and often quoted by evangelical Christians. I think it safe to say they are the two godfathers of modern evangelical Christianity\u2014at least in the English-speaking world.<\/p>\n Edwards\u2019 greatest treatise was \u201cOn the End for Which God Created the World.\u201d \u201cEnd,\u201d of course, means \u201cpurpose.\u201d There the prince of Puritan preachers argued philosophically and theologically that God has one and only one supreme purpose in everything God does\u2014to glorify himself. To put it bluntly, according to Edwards, God is the ultimate narcissist. But that\u2019s okay for God because he\u2019s God; it isn\u2019t okay for us because we are finite and fallen creatures of God. We have no right or reason to be narcissistic given our wretchedness. Also, according to Edwards, creatures can offer nothing to God except glory and what glory we give God adds nothing to his bliss. Of course, this raises many questions and Edwards answers some of them. For example, if God created the world to glorify himself, does that imply he was not already fully glorified? In that case, doesn\u2019t the world, even in its submissive glorifying of God add something to God\u2019s life, at least enjoyment, that wasn\u2019t already complete? Edwards\u2019 answer is no. Then there is the issue of evil; does evil glorify God. There Edwards is bold; even sin and evil glorify God in his judging and conquering them.<\/p>\n Wesley did not write a treatise on the purpose for which God created the world, but we can quite easily detect what he thought about it. For Wesley, God created out of love. God loves the world and all creatures with the possible exception of Satan and his co-rebel angels. God especially loves all human beings in spite of their wretchedness because he created them in his own image and likeness and because his nature is to love. Creation, especially of noble humanity, was due to the overflowing love of the Trinity. Love does not imply need; true love, the best love, God-like love, creates value in the beloved. Like Pascal, Wesley was realistic about humanity, but he did not think we are totally depraved\u2014at least not in the same sense as the Reformed tradition as represented by Edwards. He preferred to say we are deprived and that by our own decisions and actions, not due to any foreordaining plan of God. Is God glorious according to Wesley? Of course; God\u2019s glory is his love and his love is his glory. \u201cGlory\u201d without love is morally empty. On the other hand, love without power is impotent and ineffectual.<\/p>\n Some in the Wesleyan tradition, notably adherents of process theology, have taken Wesley\u2019s concept of God as unconditional love and goodness to an extreme and ended up denying God\u2019s wrath against sin and even turned God into a kind of cosmic cheerleader and coach, emptying God of power and glory. Wesley did not go there\u2014to that extreme.<\/p>\n In my estimation, Wesley, like Pascal before him, was right on target biblically, philosophically and theologically. Christian humanism can look to him, in his thoughts if not in his person, for a model. (Wesley as a person was not always particularly kind.)<\/p>\n Scripture tells us in 1 John 4:8 that \u201cGod is love.\u201d Love is God\u2019s essence; his very being. And God has invested in his human creatures capacity for that kind of love\u2014love that creates value rather than seeks it. Scripture also tells us in 2 Peter 1:4 that God\u2019s goal is to make us \u201cpartakers of the divine nature.\u201d With Wesley, I interpret that to mean that God seeks to share his love with us in transforming ways. God\u2019s grace seeks to glorify us. And God, being love, is most satisfied with us when we are being glorified by him, that is, by his grace.<\/p>\n There are two senses, then, in which human beings are glorious. First, in spite of our wretchedness due to sin, we are still and nevertheless God\u2019s image and likeness. That image and likeness in us is damaged, broken, even shattered, but not destroyed by sin. James 3:9 warns against cursing fellow human beings because they are made in God\u2019s own likeness. That isn\u2019t specific to Christians; all people are made in God\u2019s likeness and still possess special dignity and worth because of that status.<\/p>\n The second sense in which human beings are glorious is God\u2019s desire and intention and effort to transform them into even more than just creatures possessing his image and likeness. God wants to elevate them, us, to participation in his own being as love. The apostle Paul talked in 2 Corinthians 3:18 about we, God\u2019s people, presumably Christians, being transformed from one degree of glory to another\u2014a progressive process of taking in, by God\u2019s grace and power, with our cooperation of faith, God\u2019s own being\u2014love.<\/p>\n These two biblical truths form part of the foundation of Christian humanism. But they are too often neglected by those who love to insult and demean humanity thinking thereby they are giving God more glory\u2014as if glory were a zero-sum game, a finite pie, there\u2019s only so much to go around.<\/p>\n Christian humanism is the belief, then, that human beings are of unique dignity and worth and capable of cultural creativity because of God\u2019s love and grace. I want to add that Christian humanism includes belief that humans, because of God\u2019s love and grace, are able to satisfy God\u2019s own creation desire by allowing God to transform them into loving beings. \u201cGod is most satisfied with us when we are being most glorified by him.\u201d<\/p>\n To be continued: Part 3 will complete the series.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Picking up where the previous post left off: So what\u2019s the alternative? What is \u201cChristian humanism?\u201d Let me begin with Scripture. Psalm 8\u2014the biblical charter of Christian humanism. Speaking to God the Psalmist cries When I look at your heavens, the work of your fingers, the moon and the stars that you have established; what […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":58,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1574","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n