Over the last 50 years many notable evangelical thinkers have converted to the Roman Catholic Church (or to some independent Catholic church of which there are many; here I\u2019m concerned mainly with those who have converted to the RC Church).\u00a0 Think of Tom Howard, evangelical professor at Wheaton (and I think Gordon), who converted to RCC and wrote a book about his conversion called Evangelical Is Not Enough (1988).\u00a0 Think of Peter Kreeft and, most recently, my own colleague Francis Beckwith.\u00a0 But there are many more than never get noticed.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Last evening I attended the first session of a conference on Catholic-Evangelical dialogue.\u00a0 I renewed acquaintance with a former colleague (from the university where I used to teach) who has converted from being Baptist to RCC.\u00a0 (He now teaches at a Catholic university.)<\/p>\n
Over the years I\u2019ve had several students convert to RCC.\u00a0 I wouldn\u2019t call it an avalanche yet.\u00a0 But it is a noticeable movement\u2013very bright, studious, even scholarly evangelicals turning to the RCC and often attempting to maintain their evangelical identities.<\/p>\n
I\u2019ve participated in many Protestant-Catholic dialogues over the years.\u00a0 (Often the word used for \u201cProtestant\u201d in these events is \u201cEvangelical\u201d\u2013a historical term for Protestant and especially Lutheran.\u00a0 It may or may not mean evangelical as in our postfundamentalist evangelical movement.)\u00a0 I attended and participated in ecumenical dialogues between Catholic and Protestant students and faculty at the University of Munich when I studied there in the early 1980s.\u00a0 I attended and participated in dialogues between Protestants, Catholics and Orthodox in Minnesota (hosted by Carl Braaten\u2019s and Robert Jenson\u2019s Center for Evangelical and Catholic Theology).\u00a0<\/p>\n
Somehow I was not informed of the Catholic-Evangelical dialogue taking place at my current university even though I teach theology in it\u2019s seminary.\u00a0 The event is being hosted by the Honors College.\u00a0 I happened to learn about it from a poster in Starbuck\u2019s!\u00a0<\/p>\n
So the dialogue event\/conference is called the Wilkins Lecture (at least this year; there is hope to make it into an annual event).\u00a0 The premier speaker was renowned pastristics and Reformation scholar Robert Wilkins who has taught theology at Notre Dame and the University of Virginia and has authored several scholarly books on theology.\u00a0 He is a convert to RCC from the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod.<\/p>\n
The lecture was about Augustine\u2019s interpretation of Romans 5:5 and whether \u201cGod\u2019s love\u201d there means God\u2019s love for us or our love for God.\u00a0 Augustine argued, and Trent agreed, that it is our love for God.\u00a0 Most Protestants (at least Lutherans) have argued it is God\u2019s love for us.\u00a0 Therein lies a fundamental difference between traditional Catholic and traditional Protestant theology.\u00a0 Wilkins masterfully argued that the passage is referring to our love for God.<\/p>\n
The hour long discussion afterwards was bracing but civil and respectful.\u00a0 Evangelical doyen Richard Mouw spoke and asked a very good question about the salvation of the thief on the cross.\u00a0 (Viz., that he did not have time to express love for God and seems to have been saved solely by God\u2019s love for him.)\u00a0 Hans Boersma\u00a0 of Regent College also spoke up as did several others including yours truly who simply pointed out that Wesley seems to provide a middle ground on this issue.\u00a0 For Wesley, and for many evangelical in the Wesleyan tradition, God\u2019s love for us and our love for God cannot be separated and our salvation is based on both.\u00a0 (Of course, it would take an entire book to unpack that as Wesley also believed, with Luther, that salvation is by grace through faith alone.\u00a0 It\u2019s just that he argued that faith that saves is never \u201calone\u201d but always accompanied by love for God and neighbor.)<\/p>\n
One reaction I have to most of the so-called evangelical-Catholic dialogues I have attended is that \u201cevangelical\u201d often means Luther (and possibly Calvin).\u00a0 Movement evangelicals tend to get overlooked.\u00a0 Yes, the Evangelicals and Catholics Together dialogues and documents did include many movement evangelicals.\u00a0 That seemed to be the exception.\u00a0 My hope is that this current series of Evangelical-Catholic dialogues will include and even highlight a broad spectrum of movement evangelicals.<\/p>\n
Present at this current conference are quite a few movement evangelicals-turned-RCC.\u00a0 I\u2019m not aware of any RCC-turned-evangelicals present.\u00a0 (Although I don\u2019t know all the participants or attenders personally.)\u00a0 This is another notable feature of many such Protestant-Catholic dialogues I\u2019ve attended.\u00a0 These seem often to center around issues of what evangelicals (or just Protestants) can learn from Roman Catholics.\u00a0 But real dialogue would evidence genuine openness on the parts of Catholics about what the RCC church and its adherents can learn from Protestants and evangelicals.\u00a0 That I seldom hear discussed by Catholic participants in such dialogues.<\/p>\n
On a very practical level, all this evangelical-Catholic dialogue raises this question: Can a person be genuinely both evangelical and Catholic?\u00a0 Of course, some evangelicals have weighed in on that very firmly saying \u201cNo!\u201d\u00a0 Examples are R. C. Sproul and Michael Horton.\u00a0 I don\u2019t know any Wesleyans who express that negative so strongly, but I\u2019m sure there are some.<\/p>\n
Here again is where my distinction between evangelicalism as an ethos and evangelicalism as a movement should be helpful.\u00a0 Of course a RCC person can be evangelical in the ethos sense.\u00a0 I think there are bound to be tensions, but I don\u2019t see any reason in principle why a RCC person cannot be evangelical in ethos.\u00a0 The RCC allows much more latitude than many people understand.\u00a0 Such an RCC person would, in my opinion, have to believe the Bible trumps tradition when there\u2019s a conflict (most of them will deny there is any conflict) and that the fullness of salvation requires a personal conversion to Jesus Christ and cannot be merely sacramental.\u00a0 I have met RCCs who seem to be evangelical through and through.\u00a0 I\u2019m thinking, for example, of Brennan Manning (among many others).<\/p>\n
Whether a RCC person can be evangelical in the sense of belonging to the postfundamentalist, post-WW2 evangelical movement is something else.\u00a0 Of course, no one can stop one from claiming to belong to it; there\u2019s no magisterium of all evangelicals and there\u2019s no such thing as a membership card.\u00a0 Historically and sociologically (if not theologically), the postfundamentalist evangelical movement has been thoroughly Protestant even as it is also multi-and transdenominational.\u00a0 I have met some charismatic Catholics, however, who hang around evangelical parachurch organizations and attend Protestant charismatic meetings and seem to consider themselves somehow attached to this evangelical movement.\u00a0 Evangelical leaders, however, have been reluctant to recognize them as authentically evangelical.\u00a0 Very often, when a movement evangelical joins the RCC he or she is released from his or her position in an evangelical organization.<\/p>\n
I have no final word to say about whether an RCC person can be evangelical; I think it\u2019s a question open for discussion.\u00a0 Sometimes I wonder why one would want to be evangelical, other than to infiltrate the movement and convert evangelicals to Catholic beliefs and practices, but I don\u2019t conclude that his or her motives must be sinister.<\/p>\n
I do think that a person can probably only be authentically evangelical in spite of and not because of his or her RCC identity.\u00a0 By that I mean insofar as RCC identity normally includes belief in papal infallibility, the Marian dogmas, sacramental salvation, etc., a person who is RCC and wants also to be evangelical (in the movement sense) would have to live with significant cognitive dissonance.\u00a0 So would those evangelicals who accept him or her as both Catholic and evangelical.<\/p>\n
One thing I object to most strenously is any attempt to forbid proselytizing between RCC persons and evangelicals.\u00a0 The two traditions seem different enough to me that both sides will inevitably feel called to evangelize the other.\u00a0 That doesn\u2019t mean they have to think of all evangelicals or all RCC persons as unsaved.\u00a0 It means that the differences are deep and wide enough that passionate believers on both sides must feel it would be better for persons to \u201ccome over\u201d to their side\u2013that their Christianity will be more full and correct if they do.<\/p>\n
A\u00a0word to those organizing these evangelical-Catholic dialogue events: Please invite former RCC persons who have converted to evangelical faith to speak.\u00a0 There always seem to be former evangelicals (or just Protestants) speaking but seldom (in my experience, never) former Roman Catholics.<\/p>\n