#PlanetCCM: Relient K And Using CCM To Sell Sexism

#PlanetCCM: Relient K And Using CCM To Sell Sexism December 19, 2013

Content Note: Victim Blaming, Body Shaming

Dianna E. Anderson is hosting a synchroblog this week about contemporary Christian music (CCM) and how it affected the lives of those who grew up with it. I’ve already written one post on the subject explaining that, because of my ultra conservative upbringing, I wasn’t the world’s largest CCM fan. Relient K was one of only two Christian bands that I ever ended up liking (Five Iron Frenzy being the other). I have a special place in my heart for them still, but some of their older lyrics now make me cringe.

An example of this is the song “Mood Rings,” which is filled with sexist stereotypes about the overly-emotional, hysterical woman.

I’ve talked before about how the evangelical church is often invested in and therefore a huge promoter of sexism and patriarchy. “Mood Rings” is an example of one of the ways that the evangelical church uses the Christian music industry as a vehicle for this sexism.

Interestingly, this song inspired Thomas Nelson publishers to call up Relient K and have them “write” a book about girls. The Complex Infrastructure Known as the Female Mind was published in 2004 and takes it’s title from the last line of “Mood Rings.”

This the cover of the book “The Complex Infrastructure Known as the Female Mind,” designed by Margaret Pesek, with photo by Dave Johnson. Found at Christianbook.com

Relient K’s name is on the front, though, according to this interview, the book was written almost completely by Mark Nicholas, who is not a member of the group (and never was). So, this isn’t a critique of the band members themselves or their views of women–I do not know each member’s views.

I do want to analyze this book, however, for #PlanetCCM (you know how much I love analyzing Christian relationship books), to look at some of the messages that the evangelical church sent to people in my generation using the Christian music industry.

The premise of the book is taken from sexist stereotypes found in “Mood Rings:” women and girls are mysterious, complicated, emotional, and impossible to understand. The book also falls into the same traps that other books I’ve analyzed fall into.

It subtly threatens women who step outside accepted gender roles: 

The book calls women to modesty in dress (because of course, men are visual, therefore it is a woman’s role to keep them from stumbling). It rails against wearing sports bras as a top (saying they are not “Relient K-approved) (pg. 5), and decries short skirts and low-cut tops (pg. 114).

Women who don’t follow modest rules are blamed for their own oppression and even for violence done against them. The book states that if you are not “smart about what you wear” you may become “some guy’s sexual…prey.” (pg. 115)

It dehumanizes men and women:

Women are talked about as animals, and Relient K (not really Relient K) claims to have “observed girls int their natural habitats.”  (pg. ix) The author refers to large groups of girls as a “herd.” (pg. 123) The entire book reads like what Sarah Jones, on Twitter, called “a Discovery Channel approach to dating,” where men are the human researchers and women are the animals being researched.

Of course, men were animalized too. As mentioned above, the book claims that all men at times fall into the category of The Ape. The Ape is considered the “default condition of nearly all guys.” (pg. 108)

It supports racist and misogynist  notions of “purity” and gender:

Beyond being simply a tool of the patriarchy, purity culture is used to maintain white supremacy. The pure woman isn’t just the woman who doesn’t have sex. In our culture, some women are automatically viewed as “more pure” than others. The image of the “pure” woman is closely tied to the image of a young, thin, submissive, upper class, white woman. (for more on this, check out this series on Are Women Human?)

The type of girl in this book who is considered ideal–the best marriage material–is called “Vanilla Pudding” (pg. 91). Whether intentional or not, the use of the words “Vanilla Pudding” brings to mind the image of a white woman. Vanilla Pudding is also “not too smart and definitely not dumb. Vanilla Pudding is not too skinny, not too fat.” She loves church “but is not necessarily a leader unless she is called upon to do so.” The idea woman is Vanilla–doesn’t stand out, doesn’t take up too much space, doesn’t lead unless she has to.

There are racist implications in the book’s picture of the “ideal” man, too. Though the book claims that all men are at times The Ape and at times Mr. Wonderful, it still sets up a dichotomy between these two “types” of men, and the physical descriptions given for what Mr. Wonderful looks like are telling. According to the book, Mr. Wonderful, the opposite of The Ape, is “usually 5’8” or taller, is somewhat muscular, and has the perfect tan or color of skin.” (pg. 109) As Jason Dye pointed out on Twitter, putting the guy with the “perfect color of skin” opposite the guy who is “The Ape,” is pretty damn racist.

It tells women their bodies are not their own:

Throughout the book, the author sends the message to women and girls that their bodies are not for them and must be hidden, distorted, or adorned in order to please men. This ranges from seemingly silly things, like the author saying girls shouldn’t wear toe rings because guys don’t understand them (pg. 116) to some gross body shaming.

The book tells tall women that they are too intimidating to guys, and asks them to stop wearing heels, “try bending ever so slightly at the knees, and slump your shoulders a bit.” (pg. 115) It also tells women,

If the circumference around your hips exceeds that of the waistband of the jeans you are wearing, please go home and change clothes immediately. We have seen far too much Krispy Kreme spilling out over the tops of girls’ jeans. This looks gross and ridiculous.

It asks women to go to ridiculous lengths to make our bodies appear to be something they’re not in order to please men. It calls women’s bodies “gross” when they don’t measure up to men’s often impossible standards.

Music is a powerful, personal thing. What a disturbing move from the Christian music and publishing industries–taking a band that has likely meant so much to so many people and using it to sell these awful messages. “You are not you’re own,” this book says, “and it’s not just your pastor saying it. It’s not even just God saying it. Now your favorite band is saying it too.” 

"Two family members abused me, one I have totally reconciled with, the other, not. One ..."

When my abuser is welcome at ..."
"I want to share this article on FB, but totally don't want the image of ..."

Liberating Liturgies: Why Mother Bear?
"Mate of course a Sarah is being a condescending cow mate good luck in hell"

Telling My Own Story: A Perspective ..."
"We finished the actual conference, not just reading the book, and I would highly encourage ..."

Complementarians are trying to scam us.

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • CarysBirch

    Wow that song is defensive! It struck me as insecure and immature overall. As though they hadn’t had time to develop adult gender understanding yet. I have say I am glad my adolescent confusion isn’t immortalized! I hadn’t heard it before, but it’s not surprising my CCM days were more in the Skillet end of the spectrum.

    The thing that angered me was how it only gave two dimensions to women, they’re pretty and they’re emotional. I have never been pretty enough to even exist in their universe. Apparently they know “those girls” who are pretty and emotional but average looking or plain emotional girls like me don’t even exist. This is true to my experience as a teen in evangelicalism.

  • Joe Olachea III

    It’s sad that Evangelical Christianity has embraced and promoted this approach for so long. It does seem that things may be getting better, but without voices such as your’s standing up for truth this kind of logic may continue. Thank you!

  • I loved Relient K growing up and still love them now. Saw them in concert just this past year, as a matter of fact. They have so many good songs… and so many cringe worthy ones. Sometimes I hate it when my new found sensibilities take away my ability to enjoy nostalgia. I mean, I wouldn’t like to go back to the person I was, who genuinely BELIEVED the types of things the culture taught me about my worth as a woman.

    I’m SO GLAD I never knew that book existed though. As much as I loved Relient K, I would have gobbled that book right up, and I have enough scars from that time period. Glad I dodged at least one bullet.

  • Emotional girls should all get mood rings might’ve been the first song I ever heard by Reliant K. I saw them at some Christian concert at the local amusement park. Still so entrenched in Patriarchal Christianity, I had no words to explain how shitty and uncomfortable that song made me feel. Instead all I could do was rant to my friend about how shallow it was and how I felt a band marketing itself as Christian should be better. Only recently have I been able to see how that song just reinforced all the messages I heard from my mother and surrounding Christian culture that said my emotions were silly and ridiculous.

  • Alice

    I am curious if he consulted ANY women at all while he was writing this steaming pile of bullshit.

    CCM needs to be looked at critically more. I’m sure I overlooked a lot of problematic messages as a teenager.

  • Julie

    I had forgotten so much about this Christian subculture I ran away from.
    Their words are worse than I ever realized at a time in my life when
    its influence guided me, and I hated myself. Throughout my teen years, I
    read Brio, other things from Focus on the Family, and listened mostly
    to CCM bands. Now, educated and so far removed from the propaganda, I am
    shocked how these destructive messages persist from a so-called loving
    subculture who call after the same Jesus I love.

    • I read Brio as a teenager. I have a feeling that current me would be confused (and saddened) to see the messages I absorbed as a teenager. Although, I’d be curious to see what Susie Shellenberger is up to these days.

  • I underestimate how sexist some Christian relationship guides can be. I listened to Rebecca St. James as a teenager (before I realized I was a feminist) and looking back, it’s frustrating to see how she contributed to purity culture with “Wait for Me” and the same-titled book that followed.

  • Dd

    This is supposed to be a fun and silly song. They are a great Christian band

    • melissia

      Then it failed.