Hillarious Summary of the Argument from Shotgun Weddings Against Same-Sex Marriage

Hillarious Summary of the Argument from Shotgun Weddings Against Same-Sex Marriage January 30, 2013

Over at Preliator pro Causa, Joe McKen presents a hillarious summary of what has to be one of the absolute worst arguments ever made against same-sex marriage.

Marriage should be limited to unions of a man and a woman because they alone can “produce unplanned and unintended offspring,” opponents of gay marriage have told the Supreme Court.

By contrast, when same-sex couples decide to have children, “substantial advance planning is required,” said Paul D. Clement, a lawyer for House Republicans.

Lawyers defending California’s Proposition 8 and the federal Defense of Marriage Act want the high court to decide it is reasonable for the law to recognize only marriages between opposite-sex couples.

McKen sums it up nicely:

So in their world, the fact that gay couples put thought and effort into family planning is why they shouldn’t be allowed to marry, whereas accidents are a good excuse for being forced into matrimony.
One would think this was satire invented to make opponents of same-sex marriage look stupid, but it appears they really did make this argument. Amazing.
"I agree with you. As far as I see it, Jesus’ real life story ended ..."

Defending the Swoon Theory – Part ..."
"There are clearly some passages in the Gospels that indicate that Jesus believed himself to ..."

Defending the Swoon Theory – Part ..."
"That is one possibility.Most skeptics who believe that Jesus was an actual person believe that ..."

Defending the Swoon Theory – Part ..."
"Scholars who seriously study the NT do not agree that the Gospels are simply works ..."

Defending the Swoon Theory – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment