{"id":2169,"date":"2009-02-18T13:42:28","date_gmt":"2009-02-18T13:42:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/"},"modified":"2009-02-18T13:42:28","modified_gmt":"2009-02-18T13:42:28","slug":"why-im-peeved","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/","title":{"rendered":"Why I&#039;m peeved"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p>I should probably mention why this topic is an important one for me. Young-earth creationism is a particular pet peeve of mine for two main reasons. <\/p>\n<p>The first is that it is not just false, but <em>demonstrably<\/em> false, and is thus often the place where the collapse begins for soon-to-be-former Christians raised to believe in the fundamentalist house of cards.<\/p>\n<p>This house-of-cards faith is a particularly brittle and fragile belief system that insists, emphatically, that <em>all<\/em> of it must be true or else <em>none<\/em> of it is true. Faith is, for these people, a pass-fail course. Get a 100 percent and you pass. Anything less than that, and you fail.<\/p>\n<p>I grew up around some people who believed faith worked like this and yet I still can't figure out the theology behind it. Their soteriology seems to work like \"Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?\" \u2014 except with no prizes awarded for any but the final question. It's salvation by neither grace nor works, but rather by the knowledge of and mental assent to a very long list of arcane biblical interpretations.<\/p>\n<p>A very,<em> very<\/em> long list. And that very long chain is only as strong as its weakest link (to mix both my metaphor and my quiz show reference). If every item isn't true \u2014 or isn't blindly accepted as true \u2014 then they insist that it all must be false. Thus if it is not true that the world was created in six, 24-hour days about 6,800 years ago, then it is not true that Jesus loves you. Or that you should love others as Jesus has loved you. Or that your sins are forgiven. Or that you are anything but alone and godforsaken when you walk through the valley of the shadow of death.<\/p>\n<p>House-of-cards fundamentalism allows for no distinctions between babies and bathwater, between the central tenets of the faith and the adiaphora and error. So once one part of this belief system begins to collapse \u2014 as it inevitably will since young-earth creationism is disprovable \u2014 then it <em>all<\/em> has to go.<\/p>\n<p>As I said, I grew up around kids who were taught this their whole lives. They didn't have a choice about where they were going to college after graduating \u2014 it was either Bob Jones University or Bible college. As the rest of us planned to head off to Wheaton or Messiah or Azusa Pacific, those kids' parents would shake their heads sadly and pray for our protection in such worldly Babylons.<\/p>\n<p>But it's really hard, even in the hermetic and hermetically sealed world of BJU, to avoid encountering some incontrovertible piece of evidence that the earth and the universe is far, far older than young-earth creationism allows. When they encounter this evidence, they may be able to cling to some desperate form of last-Thursday-ism (the world is 6,000 years old, but was made to <em>seem<\/em> older) which may provide them with a temporary patch until they get better at living with very high levels of cognitive dissonance and barely veiled self-deception. But just as often, the whole edifice collapses. <em>Hard.<\/em> They wind up rejecting everything they ever believed.<\/p>\n<p>Everything, that is, except for that pernicious notion that \"all of it must be true or none of it is.\" These kids shoot way past what their parents feared would happen to the rest of us at Wheaton or wherever (with our dangerous book learnin' and dancing and movie-going and such) and they become the mirror-opposite of their old fundamentalist selves. They become as strident and binary in their unbelief as their failed mentors at Bob Jones were in their belief. Yet even their rebellion tends to remain shaped by that world and its narrowly imagined options. <\/p>\n<p>And that's a tragedy. I think it was Maya Angelou who said there's nothing sadder than a young cynic, because they've gone directly from knowing nothing to believing nothing.<\/p>\n<p>This scenario is not hypothetical and it is not rare. And it's not something I forgive easily. The proponents of young-earth creationism are responsible for this very scene playing out a thousand times over. Jesus spoke to exactly such people. Something about how it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their necks and be drowned in the depths of the sea. (Jesus was fond of hyperbole, but I'm not sure he's using it there.)<\/p>\n<p>The second reason that creationism or \"creation science\" is a pet-peeve of mine is that I spent many years working on behalf of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.creationcare.org\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Evangelical Environmental Network<\/a> to try to persuade evangelicals that \"creation care\" was not just permissible, but a responsibility. This is made much more difficult when the audience you are addressing \u2014 as was sometimes, but not always, the case \u2014 regards the first 11 chapters of the Book of Genesis as a \"literal\" journalistic account and <em>only<\/em> as a literal journalistic account.<\/p>\n<p>That experience was what really drove home for me the way that creationism wasn't just an additional layer of interpretation added to how these folks read their Bibles, but that it had wholly replaced any and every other meaning from the stories or the text. The word \"creation\" itself has no theological meaning for them beyond \"as opposed to evolution.\" For them, the creation accounts* and the story of Noah in the early chapters of Genesis have nothing to say about the inherent goodness of creation or about the obligation of stewardship. For them these chapters exist solely as some kind of divine amicus brief in <em>Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District<\/em> \u2014 as polemic arguments, that is, in a 20th-century American political dispute that has little to do with either science or theology.<\/p>\n<p>I found it almost impossible to communicate with those people. We had a common vocabulary, but the words all seemed to mean different things. The accounts of creation seemed, for them, to have nothing to say about divine intent or divine affection, but only about divine <em>technique.<\/em> The story of Noah seemed to be nothing more than a complicated word problem involving the measuring of livestock capacity in cubits. The story of Adam giving names to all the animals seemed, to them, to be a reason <em>not<\/em> to learn about biodiversity. And I probably don't need to tell you how they seemed to regard that bit about the Tree of Knowledge.<\/p>\n<p>\"You will know the truth,\" Jesus said. \"And the truth will set you free.\"<\/p>\n<p>What he didn't mention was that <em>free<\/em> can be a whole lot more complicated that <em>not-<\/em>free is, and that it's not always easy to convince people to choose complicated over simple. Not easy, but still worth trying.<\/p>\n<p>I just wish I had a better idea of how to reach them.<\/p>\n<p>\u2013 \u2013 \u2013 \u2013 \u2013 \u2013 \u2013 \u2013 \u2013 \u2013 \u2013 \u2013<\/p>\n<p>* Plural. Genesis 1 \u2013 2:3 offers the more famous six-day account, while in Genesis 2:4-25 we get the one-day version in a different sequence. There was some good discussion in the previous two comments threads of the differences here and the traditional ways of accounting for this. It's a difficult dilemma for those who insist they read these accounts \"literally.\" They're forced to resort to all sorts of semantic gymnastics to harmonize two different stories that were quite deliberately set down as two <em>different<\/em> stories. Their dilemma is what leads some to refer to these two different stories as a \"contradiction\" or a \"discrepancy.\"<\/p>\n<p>For the rest of us, though, that's overblown. It'd be like saying:<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin-left:40px\"><em>Aha,<\/em> Mr. Burns, I <em>caught<\/em> you! <em>First<\/em> you claimed your Luve was like a 'red, red rose that's newly sprung in June,' but <em>now<\/em> all of a sudden you're <em>contradicting<\/em> yourself and trying to tell us that your Luve is, instead, 'like the melodie that's sweetly play'd in tune.' Well which one <em>is<\/em> it, Bobby? Huh? C'mon, <em>make up y<br>\nour mind!<\/em><\/div>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I should probably mention why this topic is an important one for me. Young-earth creationism is a particular pet peeve of mine for two main reasons. The first is that it is not just false, but demonstrably false, and is thus often the place where the collapse begins for soon-to-be-former Christians raised to believe in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":111,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-evangelicals"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Why I&#039;m peeved<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"I should probably mention why this topic is an important one for me. Young-earth creationism is a particular pet peeve of mine for two main reasons. The\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why I&#039;m peeved\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I should probably mention why this topic is an important one for me. Young-earth creationism is a particular pet peeve of mine for two main reasons. The\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"slacktivist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-18T13:42:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Fred Clark\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Fred Clark\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/\",\"name\":\"Why I&#039;m peeved\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-18T13:42:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2009-02-18T13:42:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/0173c85e46e7e0951fef5752bed78b6e\"},\"description\":\"I should probably mention why this topic is an important one for me. Young-earth creationism is a particular pet peeve of mine for two main reasons. The\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Why I&#039;m peeved\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/\",\"name\":\"slacktivist\",\"description\":\"&quot;Test everything; hold fast to what is good.&quot;\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/0173c85e46e7e0951fef5752bed78b6e\",\"name\":\"Fred Clark\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e23731809f5a2c785d0416fc4211a51e?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e23731809f5a2c785d0416fc4211a51e?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Fred Clark\"},\"description\":\"Fred Clark is a graduate of Eastern Baptist Theological Seminary (now called Palmer Seminary), of Eastern College (now called Eastern University) and of the fundamentalist Timothy Christian High School (still fundamentalist and still called Timothy Christian High School, but not really thrilled to have a snarky, liberal, tree-hugging, pro-choice, pro-GLBT, peacenik, commie, evolutionist as such a vocal alumnus). A former managing editor of Prism magazine, Fred worked in the parachurch nonprofit world for a decade and then for a decade in the newspaper biz. He began blogging in 2002. In 2003 he began writing a review of the best-selling Left Behind series. Eight years later he still hasn\u2019t finished reviewing the second book of that series and the experience has left him a broken shell of a man. Fred knows the difference between the possessive \u201cits\u201d and the contraction \u201cit\u2019s,\u201d and he is acutely bothered when others mistakenly confuse the two, yet he himself just kind of instinctively types the apostrophe whether or not it belongs there. Some feel this is his greatest hypocrisy, but those who know him better know better. He\u2019s guilty of much greater hypocrisies. Jesus loves Fred far more than Fred loves Jesus, but he at least has the decency to recognize the unfairness of that lopsided relationship and he has long wished that he were better at maybe kind of sort of doing something more to correct that some day. A Baptist, an amateur, a Gen-Xer, a Gemini and a Mets fan, Fred lives in Southeastern Pennsylvania with his wife and two teenage daughters. You can reach him via email at slacktivist at hotmail dot com.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/author\/fredclark\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why I&#039;m peeved","description":"I should probably mention why this topic is an important one for me. Young-earth creationism is a particular pet peeve of mine for two main reasons. The","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why I&#039;m peeved","og_description":"I should probably mention why this topic is an important one for me. Young-earth creationism is a particular pet peeve of mine for two main reasons. The","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/","og_site_name":"slacktivist","article_published_time":"2009-02-18T13:42:28+00:00","author":"Fred Clark","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Fred Clark","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/","name":"Why I&#039;m peeved","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-18T13:42:28+00:00","dateModified":"2009-02-18T13:42:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/0173c85e46e7e0951fef5752bed78b6e"},"description":"I should probably mention why this topic is an important one for me. Young-earth creationism is a particular pet peeve of mine for two main reasons. The","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2009\/02\/18\/why-im-peeved\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Why I&#039;m peeved"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/","name":"slacktivist","description":"&quot;Test everything; hold fast to what is good.&quot;","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/0173c85e46e7e0951fef5752bed78b6e","name":"Fred Clark","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e23731809f5a2c785d0416fc4211a51e?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e23731809f5a2c785d0416fc4211a51e?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","caption":"Fred Clark"},"description":"Fred Clark is a graduate of Eastern Baptist Theological Seminary (now called Palmer Seminary), of Eastern College (now called Eastern University) and of the fundamentalist Timothy Christian High School (still fundamentalist and still called Timothy Christian High School, but not really thrilled to have a snarky, liberal, tree-hugging, pro-choice, pro-GLBT, peacenik, commie, evolutionist as such a vocal alumnus). A former managing editor of Prism magazine, Fred worked in the parachurch nonprofit world for a decade and then for a decade in the newspaper biz. He began blogging in 2002. In 2003 he began writing a review of the best-selling Left Behind series. Eight years later he still hasn\u2019t finished reviewing the second book of that series and the experience has left him a broken shell of a man. Fred knows the difference between the possessive \u201cits\u201d and the contraction \u201cit\u2019s,\u201d and he is acutely bothered when others mistakenly confuse the two, yet he himself just kind of instinctively types the apostrophe whether or not it belongs there. Some feel this is his greatest hypocrisy, but those who know him better know better. He\u2019s guilty of much greater hypocrisies. Jesus loves Fred far more than Fred loves Jesus, but he at least has the decency to recognize the unfairness of that lopsided relationship and he has long wished that he were better at maybe kind of sort of doing something more to correct that some day. A Baptist, an amateur, a Gen-Xer, a Gemini and a Mets fan, Fred lives in Southeastern Pennsylvania with his wife and two teenage daughters. You can reach him via email at slacktivist at hotmail dot com.","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/author\/fredclark\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/111"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2169"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2169\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}