{"id":21959,"date":"2014-04-21T16:59:12","date_gmt":"2014-04-21T20:59:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/?p=21959"},"modified":"2014-04-21T16:59:12","modified_gmt":"2014-04-21T20:59:12","slug":"when-moral-codes-codify-immorality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2014\/04\/21\/when-moral-codes-codify-immorality\/","title":{"rendered":"When moral codes codify immorality"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p>Mallory Ortberg offers a terrific guide to \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/the-toast.net\/2014\/04\/17\/pre-code-movies-worth-watching\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Pre-code Movies Worth Watching<\/a>,\u201d wherein she solidifies her status as one of my favorite people on the Internets with her take on <em>I Am a Fugitive From a Chain-Gang<\/em>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>My absolute favorite film of all time, bar none. You have to see it.\u00a0<em>YOU HAVE TO SEE IT<\/em>. Oh, God, I want to give away the ending\u00a0<em>so bad<\/em>, but I won\u2019t, even though it\u2019s been over 80 years. It\u2019s one of the most absolutely harrowing endings in film history, and\u00a0<em>completely unthinkable<\/em>\u00a0for a studio film to end on that kind of a note at the time. There\u2019s a hiss and a whisper and footsteps in the dark and an admission of something that\u2019s impossible to believe. Oh, God, watch it yesterday and call me when you\u2019re done so we can talk about it for hours.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The code of \u201cpre-code\u201d was the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Motion_Picture_Production_Code\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Motion Picture Production Code<\/a>, a long, \u201ctouch not, taste not, handle not\u201d list of guidelines and taboos from the Hollywood studio censors outlining what topics and depictions were off-limits.<\/p>\n<p>Ortberg\u2019s survey offers some helpful (and funny) categories, starting with \u201cWorth Watching For Any Reasons\u201d and then descending into others such as \u201cLess Well-Known Remakes,\u201d \u201cIf You Want to Get Into Pre-Civil-Rights-Era Racial Dynamics,\u201d \u201cUgh, If You Must, They\u2019re \u2018Important\u2019 But I Hate Them,\u201d \u201cIf You Want to Take a Deeply Uncomfortable Journey to Another Time,\u201d and\u00a0\u201cWorth It for the Titles Alone.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Oh, those <em>titles<\/em>. Here\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/List_of_Pre-Code_films\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Wikipedia\u2019s long list of pre-code movies<\/a> \u2014 a list that could easily provide all the band names we\u2019ll ever need for the next decade. \u00a0A small selection, just from those released in 1933:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>A Shriek in the Night<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em><\/em><em>Air Hostess<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Ann Carver\u2019s Profession<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Beauty for Sale<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Broadway Through a Keyhole<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Ecstasy<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Ex-Lady<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Girl Without a Room<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>The Mayor of Hell<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Midnight Mary<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>The Past of Mary Holmes<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Roman Scandals<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>She Done Him Wrong<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>She Had to Say Yes<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Should Ladies Behave<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>The Sin of Nora Moran<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>The Secret of Madame Blanche<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>The Song of Songs<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>When Ladies Meet<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>The White Sister<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Wild Boys of the Road<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>The Woman Accused<br>\n<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/52\/2014\/04\/MadamSatan.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter  wp-image-21960\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/52\/2014\/04\/MadamSatan.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"489\" height=\"374\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Those titles seem to have functioned the way the movie rating system functions today. They may not have had such a thing as an \u201cR-rating\u201d in 1934, but I think audiences knew what they could expect from movies with titles like <em>Fugitive Lovers, Massacre,<\/em> or <em>The Road to Ruin.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A survey of pre-code movies is an excellent antidote to much of the nonsense we sometimes hear about \u201cold-fashioned morality.\u201d Our grandparents\u2019 generation is sometimes said to have lived in a more innocent time, before America went to Hell in a handbasket and began abandoning traditional morality. But it turns out our grandparents were lining up at the box office to see movies like <em>She Couldn\u2019t Say No<\/em> or <em>The Unholy Three<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Those pre-code movies are a good reminder that much of what gets glibly described as \u201ctraditional morality\u201d was actually really, really <em>immoral<\/em>. I don\u2019t just mean that people back then were titillated by stories they regarded as immoral. That\u2019s always been true and probably always will be true. That\u2019s the transgressive allure of the lurid, and there\u2019s a sense in which it does as much to reinforce the prevailing morality as any moral code.<\/p>\n<p>But the larger problem isn\u2019t that people back then often transgressed against their \u201ctraditional morality.\u201d The larger problem was that traditional morality itself was, in many ways, deeply perverse \u2014 it celebrated evil and injustice as exemplary rectitude while condemning and forbidding much that was good and beautiful and true.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s Mallory Ortberg, again, describing an example of this, from the 1930 extravaganza <em>Golden Dawn<\/em>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Fortify your spirit before giving this one a chance. It\u2019s about a white woman kidnapped and raised by \u201cAfrican natives\u201d (the setting never gets more specific than \u201ccolonial Africa\u201d) who falls in love with an Englishman but can\u2019t marry him until she\u2019s able to decisively prove that she\u2019s not biracial. Most of the \u201cnatives\u201d are played by English actors in blackface, and the happy ending comes about when the lead character is released from a sacrificial ceremony for being \u201cpure white,\u201d so gird your loins if you decide to watch it. OH. And it\u2019s a\u00a0<em>musical<\/em>. So.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>But then the film industry came up with the Hays Office and the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Motion_Picture_Production_Code\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Motion Picture Production Code<\/a> to enforce moral standards.<\/p>\n<p>Take a look at that code, particularly at it\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Motion_Picture_Production_Code#Don.27ts_and_Be_Carefuls\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">lists of \u201cDon\u2019ts\u201d and \u201cBe Carefuls,\u201d<\/a>\u00a0and you\u2019ll see that it simply codified that same traditional immorality. Here, to get specific, are items No. 6 and No. 11 from the \u201cDon\u2019ts\u201d \u2014 things that \u201cshall not appear in pictures produced by the members of this Association, irrespective of the manner in which they are treated\u201d:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>6.<\/strong> Miscegenation (sex relationships between the white and black races)<\/p>\n<p><strong>11.<\/strong> Willful offense to any nation, race or creed<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>No. 6 tells you all you need to know about No. 11 \u2014 what was meant by it and how it was applied. That 11th Don\u2019t conveys an admirable sentiment of respect for every \u201cnation, race or creed,\u201d but it was constricted by the unstated, unexamined, almost unconscious assumptions that put that prohibition against any depiction of \u201cmiscegenation\u201d five slots higher on the list. Thus the bad parts of \u201ctraditional morality\u201d prevented even the good parts from being any good.<\/p>\n<p>But before we congratulate ourselves for our relative enlightenment, we should remember that the dangerous tricky thing about unstated, unexamined, and (almost) unconscious assumptions is that they are all of those things. We don\u2019t fully know we\u2019re making them when we\u2019re making them.<\/p>\n<p>And we\u2019re making just as many of them as Hays or Breen or Comstock or any other notoriously myopic moral censor of the past.<\/p>\n<p>We have overcome and corrected some of the immoral blindnesses of \u201ctraditional morality\u201d \u2014 84 percent of white Americans no longer think there should be a law against interracial marriage, and that has been\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.gallup.com\/poll\/163697\/approve-marriage-blacks-whites.aspx\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>the majority view since way back in 1996<\/em><\/a> (!). But there are plenty of other blindnesses and unstated assumptions from traditional morality that we continue to suffer from \u2014 as well as some new ones we\u2019ve come up with to add to the list, probably. For me, personally, for example, there\u2019s the obvious moral blind-spot regarding \u2026<\/p>\n<p>I can\u2019t finish that sentence yet, but I\u2019ve no doubt that a generation from now others will have no trouble doing so. It may turn out to be a very <em>long<\/em> sentence.<\/p>\n<p>The Motion Picture Production Code has not aged well because <em>no moral code ages well<\/em>. Every attempt to codify morality that goes beyond \u201clove is the fulfillment of the law\u201d or \u201cGod damn it, you\u2019ve got to be kind\u201d is bound to be shaped by all of the blindnesses and the assumptions of the people and the age that produced it. So every moral code will therefore have omissions and oversights, and will also include horrors that have no business being included. And just like in the MPPC\u2019s list of \u201cDon\u2019ts,\u201d those omissions and horrible admissions will wind up skewing even the good bits that might seem unrelated to them.<\/p>\n<p>Whenever you question the \u201ctraditional morality\u201d of any moral code that\u2019s not aging well, you\u2019ll be accused of lawless anarchy and antinomianism. \u201cSo you think <em>anything goes<\/em>\u201d they say. They don\u2019t mean it as a question, so they won\u2019t wait for, or allow, an answer. And thus they\u2019ll never understand the point.<\/p>\n<p>The point isn\u2019t that we should once and for all destroy all moral codes. The point is that we should <em>perpetually<\/em>\u00a0be destroying them so that we can perpetually replace them.<\/p>\n<p>Moral codes are things that perish with use. They have\u00a0an appearance of wisdom in promoting self-imposed piety and severity, but they don\u2019t age well. Test everything, hold onto the good.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Whenever you question the \u201ctraditional morality\u201d of any moral code that\u2019s not aging well, you\u2019ll be accused of lawless anarchy and antinomianism. \u201cSo you think anything goes\u201d they say. They don\u2019t mean it as a question, so they won\u2019t wait for, or allow, an answer. And thus they\u2019ll never understand the point.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":141,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21959","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>When moral codes codify immorality<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Whenever you question the \u201ctraditional morality\u201d of any moral code that\u2019s not aging well, you\u2019ll be accused of lawless anarchy and antinomianism. \u201cSo you think anything goes\u201d they say. They don\u2019t mean it as a question, so they won\u2019t wait for, or allow, an answer. And thus they\u2019ll never understand the point.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2014\/04\/21\/when-moral-codes-codify-immorality\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"When moral codes codify immorality\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Whenever you question the \u201ctraditional morality\u201d of any moral code that\u2019s not aging well, you\u2019ll be accused of lawless anarchy and antinomianism. \u201cSo you think anything goes\u201d they say. They don\u2019t mean it as a question, so they won\u2019t wait for, or allow, an answer. And thus they\u2019ll never understand the point.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2014\/04\/21\/when-moral-codes-codify-immorality\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"slacktivist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-04-21T20:59:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/files\/2014\/04\/MadamSatan.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Fred Clark\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Fred Clark\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2014\/04\/21\/when-moral-codes-codify-immorality\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2014\/04\/21\/when-moral-codes-codify-immorality\/\",\"name\":\"When moral codes codify immorality\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2014-04-21T20:59:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-21T20:59:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/32666545e535b697afb93d9848dcfc47\"},\"description\":\"Whenever you question the \u201ctraditional morality\u201d of any moral code that\u2019s not aging well, you\u2019ll be accused of lawless anarchy and antinomianism. \u201cSo you think anything goes\u201d they say. They don\u2019t mean it as a question, so they won\u2019t wait for, or allow, an answer. And thus they\u2019ll never understand the point.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2014\/04\/21\/when-moral-codes-codify-immorality\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2014\/04\/21\/when-moral-codes-codify-immorality\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2014\/04\/21\/when-moral-codes-codify-immorality\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"When moral codes codify immorality\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/\",\"name\":\"slacktivist\",\"description\":\"&quot;Test everything; hold fast to what is good.&quot;\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/32666545e535b697afb93d9848dcfc47\",\"name\":\"Fred Clark\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7083ccd514d4fb8d5043041756d766a0?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7083ccd514d4fb8d5043041756d766a0?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Fred Clark\"},\"description\":\"Fred Clark is a graduate of Eastern Baptist Theological Seminary (now called Palmer Seminary), of Eastern College (now called Eastern University) and of the fundamentalist Timothy Christian High School (still fundamentalist and still called Timothy Christian High School, but not really thrilled to have a snarky, liberal, tree-hugging, pro-choice, pro-GLBT, peacenik, commie, evolutionist as such a vocal alumnus). A former managing editor of Prism magazine, Fred worked in the parachurch nonprofit world for a decade and then for a decade in the newspaper biz. He began blogging in 2002. In 2003 he began writing a review of the best-selling Left Behind series. Eight years later he still hasn\u2019t finished reviewing the second book of that series and the experience has left him a broken shell of a man. Fred knows the difference between the possessive \u201cits\u201d and the contraction \u201cit\u2019s,\u201d and he is acutely bothered when others mistakenly confuse the two, yet he himself just kind of instinctively types the apostrophe whether or not it belongs there. Some feel this is his greatest hypocrisy, but those who know him better know better. He\u2019s guilty of much greater hypocrisies. Jesus loves Fred far more than Fred loves Jesus, but he at least has the decency to recognize the unfairness of that lopsided relationship and he has long wished that he were better at maybe kind of sort of doing something more to correct that some day. A Baptist, an amateur, a Gen-Xer, a Gemini and a Mets fan, Fred lives in Southeastern Pennsylvania with his wife and two teenage daughters. You can reach him via email at slacktivist at hotmail dot com.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/author\/fredclark1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"When moral codes codify immorality","description":"Whenever you question the \u201ctraditional morality\u201d of any moral code that\u2019s not aging well, you\u2019ll be accused of lawless anarchy and antinomianism. \u201cSo you think anything goes\u201d they say. They don\u2019t mean it as a question, so they won\u2019t wait for, or allow, an answer. And thus they\u2019ll never understand the point.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2014\/04\/21\/when-moral-codes-codify-immorality\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"When moral codes codify immorality","og_description":"Whenever you question the \u201ctraditional morality\u201d of any moral code that\u2019s not aging well, you\u2019ll be accused of lawless anarchy and antinomianism. \u201cSo you think anything goes\u201d they say. They don\u2019t mean it as a question, so they won\u2019t wait for, or allow, an answer. And thus they\u2019ll never understand the point.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2014\/04\/21\/when-moral-codes-codify-immorality\/","og_site_name":"slacktivist","article_published_time":"2014-04-21T20:59:12+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/files\/2014\/04\/MadamSatan.jpg"}],"author":"Fred Clark","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Fred Clark","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2014\/04\/21\/when-moral-codes-codify-immorality\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2014\/04\/21\/when-moral-codes-codify-immorality\/","name":"When moral codes codify immorality","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#website"},"datePublished":"2014-04-21T20:59:12+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-21T20:59:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/32666545e535b697afb93d9848dcfc47"},"description":"Whenever you question the \u201ctraditional morality\u201d of any moral code that\u2019s not aging well, you\u2019ll be accused of lawless anarchy and antinomianism. \u201cSo you think anything goes\u201d they say. They don\u2019t mean it as a question, so they won\u2019t wait for, or allow, an answer. And thus they\u2019ll never understand the point.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2014\/04\/21\/when-moral-codes-codify-immorality\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2014\/04\/21\/when-moral-codes-codify-immorality\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2014\/04\/21\/when-moral-codes-codify-immorality\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"When moral codes codify immorality"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/","name":"slacktivist","description":"&quot;Test everything; hold fast to what is good.&quot;","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/32666545e535b697afb93d9848dcfc47","name":"Fred Clark","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7083ccd514d4fb8d5043041756d766a0?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7083ccd514d4fb8d5043041756d766a0?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","caption":"Fred Clark"},"description":"Fred Clark is a graduate of Eastern Baptist Theological Seminary (now called Palmer Seminary), of Eastern College (now called Eastern University) and of the fundamentalist Timothy Christian High School (still fundamentalist and still called Timothy Christian High School, but not really thrilled to have a snarky, liberal, tree-hugging, pro-choice, pro-GLBT, peacenik, commie, evolutionist as such a vocal alumnus). A former managing editor of Prism magazine, Fred worked in the parachurch nonprofit world for a decade and then for a decade in the newspaper biz. He began blogging in 2002. In 2003 he began writing a review of the best-selling Left Behind series. Eight years later he still hasn\u2019t finished reviewing the second book of that series and the experience has left him a broken shell of a man. Fred knows the difference between the possessive \u201cits\u201d and the contraction \u201cit\u2019s,\u201d and he is acutely bothered when others mistakenly confuse the two, yet he himself just kind of instinctively types the apostrophe whether or not it belongs there. Some feel this is his greatest hypocrisy, but those who know him better know better. He\u2019s guilty of much greater hypocrisies. Jesus loves Fred far more than Fred loves Jesus, but he at least has the decency to recognize the unfairness of that lopsided relationship and he has long wished that he were better at maybe kind of sort of doing something more to correct that some day. A Baptist, an amateur, a Gen-Xer, a Gemini and a Mets fan, Fred lives in Southeastern Pennsylvania with his wife and two teenage daughters. You can reach him via email at slacktivist at hotmail dot com.","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/author\/fredclark1\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21959","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/141"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21959"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21959\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21959"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21959"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21959"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}