{"id":6304,"date":"2012-02-18T19:04:10","date_gmt":"2012-02-19T00:04:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/?p=6304"},"modified":"2022-12-14T23:28:46","modified_gmt":"2022-12-15T04:28:46","slug":"the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2012\/02\/18\/the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal\/","title":{"rendered":"The ‘biblical view’ that’s younger than the Happy Meal"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

In 1979, McDonald\u2019s introduced the Happy Meal.<\/p>\n

Sometime after that, it was decided that the Bible teaches that human life begins at conception.<\/p>\n

Ask any American evangelical, today, what the Bible says about abortion and they will insist that this is what it says. (Many don\u2019t actually believe this<\/a>, but they know it is the only answer that won\u2019t get them in trouble.) They\u2019ll be a little fuzzy on where, exactly, the Bible says this, but they\u2019ll insist that it does.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s new. If you had asked American evangelicals that same question the year I was born you would not have gotten the same answer.<\/p>\n

That year, Christianity Today<\/em> \u2014 edited by Harold Lindsell, champion of \u201cinerrancy\u201d and author of The Battle for the Bible<\/em> \u2014 published a special issue devoted to the topics of contraception and abortion. That issue included many articles that today would get their authors, editors \u2014 probably even their readers<\/em> \u2014 fired from almost any evangelical institution. For example, one article by a professor from Dallas Theological Seminary criticized the Roman Catholic position on abortion as unbiblical. Jonathan Dudley quotes from the article in his book Broken Words: The Abuse of Science and Faith in American Politics<\/a><\/em>. Keep in mind that this is from a conservative evangelical seminary professor, writing in Billy Graham\u2019s magazine for editor Harold Lindsell:<\/p>\n

God does not regard the fetus as a soul, no matter how far gestation has progressed. The Law plainly exacts: \u201cIf a man kills any human life he will be put to death\u201d (Lev. 24:17). But according to Exodus 21:22-24, the destruction of the fetus is not a capital offense. \u2026 Clearly, then, in contrast to the mother, the fetus is not reckoned as a soul.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Christianity Today<\/em> would not publish that article in 2012. They might not even let you write that in comments on their website. If you applied for a job in 2012 with Christianity Today<\/em> or Dallas Theological Seminary and they found out that you had written something like that, ever, you would not be hired.<\/p>\n

At some point between 1968 and 2012, the Bible began to say something different. That\u2019s interesting.<\/p>\n

Even more interesting is how thoroughly the record has been rewritten. We have always<\/em> been at war with Eastasia.<\/p>\n

Click over to Dr. Norman L. Geisler\u2019s<\/a> website and you\u2019ll find all the hallmarks of a respected figure in the evangelical establishment. You\u2019ll see that Geisler has taught at Trinity Evangelical Seminary, Dallas Seminary and Southern Evangelical Seminary. You\u2019ll see a promotion for his newest book, Defending Inerrancy,<\/em> with recommendations from such evangelical stalwarts as Al Mohler and J.I. Packer, as well as a link to an online store offering some of the other dozens of books written by Geisler. And you\u2019ll see a big promo for the anti-abortion movie October Baby,<\/em> because Geisler is, of course, anti-abortion, just like Mohler and Packer and every other respected figure in the evangelical establishment is and, of course, must be.<\/em><\/p>\n

But back in the day, Dudley notes, Geisler \u201cargued for the permissibility of abortion in a 1971 book, stating \u2018The embryo is not fully human \u2014 it is an undeveloped person.'\u201d That was in Ethics: Alternatives and Issues,<\/em> published by Zondervan. It\u2019s still in print, kind of, as Christian Ethics: Contemporary Issues and Options<\/em>. And now it says something different. Now it\u2019s unambiguously anti-abortion.<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t mean to pick on Geisler. He\u2019s no different from Packer or Graham or any other leading evangelical figure who\u2019s been around as long as those guys have. They all now believe that the Bible teaches that life begins at conception. They believe this absolutely, unambiguously, firmly, resolutely and loudly. That\u2019s what they believed 10 years ago, and that\u2019s what they believed 20 years ago.<\/p>\n

But it wasn\u2019t what they believed 30 years ago. Thirty years ago they all believed quite the opposite.<\/p>\n

Again, that\u2019s interesting.<\/p>\n

I heartily recommend Dudley\u2019s book for his discussion of this switch and the main figures who brought it about \u2014 Francis Schaeffer, Jerry Falwell, Richard Viguerie, etc. But here I just want to quote one section about the strangeness of this 180-degree turn, and how it caught many evangelicals off-guard:<\/p>\n

By the mid-1980s, the evangelical right was so successful with this strategy that the popular evangelical community would no longer tolerate any alternative position. Hence, the outrage over a book titled Brave New People<\/em> published by InterVarsity Press in 1984. In addition to discussing a number of new biotechnologies, including genetic engineering and in vitro fertilization, the author, an evangelical professor living in New Zealand, also devoted a chapter to abortion. His position was similar to that of most evangelicals 15 years prior. Although he did not believe the fetus was a full-fledged person from conception, he did believe that because it was a potential person, it should be treated with respect. Abortion was only permissible to protect the health and well-being of the mother, to preclude a severely deformed child, and in a few other hard cases, such as rape and incest.<\/p>\n

Although this would have been an unremarkable book in 1970, the popular evangelical community was outraged. Evangelical magazines and popular leaders across the country decried the book and its author, and evangelicals picketed outside the publisher\u2019s office and urged booksellers to boycott the publisher. One writer called it a \u201cmonstrous book.\u201d \u2026 The popular response to the book \u2014 despite its endorsements from Carl F.H. Henry<\/a>, the first editor of Christianity Today,<\/em> and Lew Smedes, an evangelical professor of ethics at Fuller Theological Seminary \u2014 was so overwhelmingly hostile that the book became the first ever withdrawn by InterVarsity Press over the course of nearly half a century in business.<\/p>\n

The book was republished a year later by Eerdmans Press. In a preface, the author noted, \u201cThe heresy of which I appear to be guilty is that I cannot state categorically that human\/personal life commences at day one of gestation. This, it seems, is being made a basic affirmation of evangelicalism, from which there can be no deviation. \u2026 No longer is it sufficient to hold classic evangelical affirmations on the nature of biblical revelation, the person and work of Christ, or justification by faith alone. In order to be labeled an evangelical, it is now essential to hold a particular view of the status of the embryo and fetus.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The poor folks at InterVarsity Press, Carl Henry, Lewis Smedes and everyone else who was surprised by the totality of this reversal, by its suddenness and the vehemence with which it came to be an \u201cessential\u201d and \u201cbasic affirmation of evangelicalism\u201d quickly got on board with the new rules.<\/p>\n

By the time of the 1988 elections, no one any longer spoke sarcastically of \u201cthe heresy\u201d of failing to \u201cstate categorically that human\/personal life commences at day one of gestation.\u201d By that time, it was simply viewed as an actual heresy. By the time of the 1988 elections, no one was aghast that a strict anti-abortion position was viewed as of equal \u2014 or greater \u2014 importance than one\u2019s views of biblical revelation or the work of Christ. That was just a given.<\/p>\n

By the time of the 1988 elections, everyone in American evangelicalism was wholly opposed to legal abortion and everyone in American evangelicalism was pretending that this had always been the case.<\/p>\n

We have always<\/em> been at war with Eastasia. Everyone knows that.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In 1979, McDonald\u2019s introduced the Happy Meal. Sometime after that, it was decided that the Bible teaches that human life begins at conception. Ask any American evangelical, today, what the Bible says about abortion and they will insist that this is what it says. (Many don\u2019t actually believe this, but they know it is the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":141,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[9,237],"class_list":["post-6304","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-abortion","tag-evangelicals"],"yoast_head":"\nThe 'biblical view' that's younger than the Happy Meal<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In 1979, McDonald's introduced the Happy Meal. Sometime after that, it was decided that the Bible teaches that human life begins at conception. Ask any\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2012\/02\/18\/the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The 'biblical view' that's younger than the Happy Meal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In 1979, McDonald's introduced the Happy Meal. Sometime after that, it was decided that the Bible teaches that human life begins at conception. Ask any\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2012\/02\/18\/the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"slacktivist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-02-19T00:04:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-12-15T04:28:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Fred Clark\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Fred Clark\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2012\/02\/18\/the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2012\/02\/18\/the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal\/\",\"name\":\"The 'biblical view' that's younger than the Happy Meal\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-02-19T00:04:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-12-15T04:28:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/32666545e535b697afb93d9848dcfc47\"},\"description\":\"In 1979, McDonald's introduced the Happy Meal. Sometime after that, it was decided that the Bible teaches that human life begins at conception. Ask any\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2012\/02\/18\/the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2012\/02\/18\/the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2012\/02\/18\/the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The ‘biblical view’ that’s younger than the Happy Meal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/\",\"name\":\"slacktivist\",\"description\":\""Test everything; hold fast to what is good."\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/32666545e535b697afb93d9848dcfc47\",\"name\":\"Fred Clark\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7083ccd514d4fb8d5043041756d766a0?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7083ccd514d4fb8d5043041756d766a0?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Fred Clark\"},\"description\":\"Fred Clark is a graduate of Eastern Baptist Theological Seminary (now called Palmer Seminary), of Eastern College (now called Eastern University) and of the fundamentalist Timothy Christian High School (still fundamentalist and still called Timothy Christian High School, but not really thrilled to have a snarky, liberal, tree-hugging, pro-choice, pro-GLBT, peacenik, commie, evolutionist as such a vocal alumnus). A former managing editor of Prism magazine, Fred worked in the parachurch nonprofit world for a decade and then for a decade in the newspaper biz. He began blogging in 2002. In 2003 he began writing a review of the best-selling Left Behind series. Eight years later he still hasn\u2019t finished reviewing the second book of that series and the experience has left him a broken shell of a man. Fred knows the difference between the possessive \u201cits\u201d and the contraction \u201cit\u2019s,\u201d and he is acutely bothered when others mistakenly confuse the two, yet he himself just kind of instinctively types the apostrophe whether or not it belongs there. Some feel this is his greatest hypocrisy, but those who know him better know better. He\u2019s guilty of much greater hypocrisies. Jesus loves Fred far more than Fred loves Jesus, but he at least has the decency to recognize the unfairness of that lopsided relationship and he has long wished that he were better at maybe kind of sort of doing something more to correct that some day. A Baptist, an amateur, a Gen-Xer, a Gemini and a Mets fan, Fred lives in Southeastern Pennsylvania with his wife and two teenage daughters. You can reach him via email at slacktivist at hotmail dot com.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/author\/fredclark1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The 'biblical view' that's younger than the Happy Meal","description":"In 1979, McDonald's introduced the Happy Meal. Sometime after that, it was decided that the Bible teaches that human life begins at conception. Ask any","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2012\/02\/18\/the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The 'biblical view' that's younger than the Happy Meal","og_description":"In 1979, McDonald's introduced the Happy Meal. Sometime after that, it was decided that the Bible teaches that human life begins at conception. Ask any","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2012\/02\/18\/the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal\/","og_site_name":"slacktivist","article_published_time":"2012-02-19T00:04:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-12-15T04:28:46+00:00","author":"Fred Clark","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Fred Clark","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2012\/02\/18\/the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2012\/02\/18\/the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal\/","name":"The 'biblical view' that's younger than the Happy Meal","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-02-19T00:04:10+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-15T04:28:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/32666545e535b697afb93d9848dcfc47"},"description":"In 1979, McDonald's introduced the Happy Meal. Sometime after that, it was decided that the Bible teaches that human life begins at conception. Ask any","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2012\/02\/18\/the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2012\/02\/18\/the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/2012\/02\/18\/the-biblical-view-thats-younger-than-the-happy-meal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The ‘biblical view’ that’s younger than the Happy Meal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/","name":"slacktivist","description":""Test everything; hold fast to what is good."","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/32666545e535b697afb93d9848dcfc47","name":"Fred Clark","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7083ccd514d4fb8d5043041756d766a0?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7083ccd514d4fb8d5043041756d766a0?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","caption":"Fred Clark"},"description":"Fred Clark is a graduate of Eastern Baptist Theological Seminary (now called Palmer Seminary), of Eastern College (now called Eastern University) and of the fundamentalist Timothy Christian High School (still fundamentalist and still called Timothy Christian High School, but not really thrilled to have a snarky, liberal, tree-hugging, pro-choice, pro-GLBT, peacenik, commie, evolutionist as such a vocal alumnus). A former managing editor of Prism magazine, Fred worked in the parachurch nonprofit world for a decade and then for a decade in the newspaper biz. He began blogging in 2002. In 2003 he began writing a review of the best-selling Left Behind series. Eight years later he still hasn\u2019t finished reviewing the second book of that series and the experience has left him a broken shell of a man. Fred knows the difference between the possessive \u201cits\u201d and the contraction \u201cit\u2019s,\u201d and he is acutely bothered when others mistakenly confuse the two, yet he himself just kind of instinctively types the apostrophe whether or not it belongs there. Some feel this is his greatest hypocrisy, but those who know him better know better. He\u2019s guilty of much greater hypocrisies. Jesus loves Fred far more than Fred loves Jesus, but he at least has the decency to recognize the unfairness of that lopsided relationship and he has long wished that he were better at maybe kind of sort of doing something more to correct that some day. A Baptist, an amateur, a Gen-Xer, a Gemini and a Mets fan, Fred lives in Southeastern Pennsylvania with his wife and two teenage daughters. You can reach him via email at slacktivist at hotmail dot com.","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/author\/fredclark1\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6304","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/141"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6304"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6304\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6304"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6304"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/slacktivist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}