![\"Image](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/7\/2015\/04\/shutterstock_pinnacle-Peshkova.jpg\")
<\/a>Once you\u2019ve reached a pinnacle, you can\u2019t keep whining that you\u2019re only teetering because you\u2019re a woman. You\u2019re teetering because the pinnacle is slim, sharp and lonely, and you can only remain there if you belong there, or if you have one hell of a safety belt supporting you. Those that belong there make the pinnacle look easy, the rest impale themselves or fall. Or they loll about in the safety belt, and stagnate.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
I wrote that a long time ago<\/strong>, back when Katie Couric was complaining<\/a> that her dismal ratings at CBS were due to sexism. They weren\u2019t. They were due to her being the wrong person for the job. <\/p>\n
I\u2019m not sure why I remembered this tonight. I imagine it\u2019s because Hillary is a woman who has been at the pinnacle for a very long time, and she has never looked less at-ease; she has never looked this covered in flop-sweat, this soon. Peggy Noonan calls it Clinton\u2019s \u201cunglainly glide\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n
Hillary Clinton\u2019s announcement followed by her dark-windowed SUV journey into deepest darkest America was the most inept, phony, shallow, slickily-slick and meaningless launch of a presidential candidacy I have ever seen. We have come to quite a pass when the Clintons can\u2019t even do the show business of politics well. The whole extravaganza has the look of profound incompetence and disorganization\u2014no one could have been thinking this through\u2014or profound cynicism, or both. It has yielded only one good thing, and that is a memorable line, as Mrs. Clinton glided by reporters: \u201cWe do have a plan. We have a plan for my plan.\u201d That is how the Washington Post quoted her, on ideas on campaign finance reform.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
I mean, even Ruth Marcus noticed<\/a>. <\/p>\n
You know it\u2019s not going well<\/strong> when someone has to play it this safe, this soon. Hillary, already at the pinnacle, is feeling so insecure, so inclined to the teeter, that she is trying very hard to remain still, and stay very, very quiet, so as not to tumble \u2014 all while giving an impression of dynamism and purpose. <\/p>\n
It doesn\u2019t work that way. Better to teeter and fall than to render oneself immobile in a desperate attempt to hold on to a spot that perhaps you never ought to have ventured out to.<\/p>\n
For now, she is relying on the \u201csafety belt\u201d of the press \u2014 the members of the mainstream media who are chasing after her stale \u201cScoobie Van\u201d<\/a> like Keystone Kops<\/a>, and diligently sticking to the \u201chow\u2019d you get to be so great\u201d script they agreed to decades ago. <\/p>\n
Only Hillary \u2014 truly, only Hillary \u2014 could slipthrough \u201cserver-and-deleted-emailgate\u201d as easily as she did (recall how annoyed she seemed that she even had to pretend<\/em> to talk to the press about it a few weeks ago, and remember, too, the first question<\/a>, \u201cwould all this fuss be made if you were a man?\u201d<\/em>)<\/p>\n
It\u2019s very strange, really.<\/strong> The private-server story (and the foreign donor story!) was one that \u2014 for a day or two \u2014 even mediafolk seemed to think was serious, and mattered<\/a>, until it wasn\u2019t, and it didn\u2019t. <\/p>\n
Hillary knows she is teetering, and not because of sexism, but because of her own overreach, her own disingenuity<\/a>, her own sense of entitlement and barely-concealed boredom<\/a> as she takes on a campaign she very likely believes she shouldn\u2019t actually have to bother with; it\u2019s 550 more days of lip-service and pretense, sacrificed to mere tiresome process, when the symbology of her presidency<\/a> is so urgently needed! <\/p>\n
Nevertheless, Hillary knows that, for now, she remains on the pinnacle because she has the protection of the press. The same mainstream media that huffed about \u201canti-Clinton\u201d donors<\/a> in 2006 is already in position; they\u2019re already questioning private citizens<\/a> who dare to have incorrect opinions<\/a>, ones that might be deemed \u201canti-Clintite\u201d.<\/a><\/p>\n
But Hillary also knows something she didn\u2019t know in 2008:<\/strong> should the opportunity present itself, the press will throw her over in a heartbeat for a lighter, more graceful candidate \u2014 one with a more compelling story and less historical bulk to deal with. They did it once before. Compared to the Slog of Hillary, Candidate Obama was featherlight on their shoulders, on their way to the top.<\/p>\n
Here\u2019s the truth: If the press took all of the stories and untruths and scandals attached to Hillary and then pretended that she was a Republican \u2014 and reacted accordingly \u2014 Hillary would be over and done, and planning tea parties with Baby Charlotte, right now. But she is a Democrat and the party bench is very thin \u2014 and, to be cheeky, there is no strong gay candidate whose presidency would be equally as \u201chistoric\u201d \u2014 so Hillary is getting a monumental<\/em> pass, and she has to know that, too. <\/p>\n
Which is why she is being so very careful, and so very still and empty, as she holds to her spot at the top.<\/p>\n
It might be a pass too far.<\/em> On some level, self-respecting journalists have to be bothered by it \u2014 they have to know that they are propping up the very sort of Nixonesque creature they were so proud to pull down<\/a>. If they are bothered by that, then all they need is a good-enough reason to push Hillary aside, in order to save their credibility.<\/p>\n
Noonan seems to allude to this truth, as well: <\/p>\n
in the case of Mrs. Clinton we are going to see the press act either like the press of a great nation\u2014hungry, raucous, alive, demanding\u2014or like a hopelessly sickened organism, a big flailing octopus with no strength in its arms, lying like a greasy blob at the bottom of the sea, dying of ideology poisoning.
\n. . . Mrs. Clinton isn\u2019t grilled, is never forced to submit to anyone\u2019s morning-show impertinence, is never the object of the snotty question or the sharp demand for information\u2026No one pushes. No one shouts the rude question or rolls out the carefully scripted set of studio inquiries meant to make the candidate squirm.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\nFor now, the press doesn\u2019t want her squirming<\/strong>, any more than she wants to squirm, because she\u2019s barely hanging on to that lonely, sharp pinnacle toward which she has directed her entire life. For now, there is no one else the narrowly focused press can see, waiting in the wings. <\/p>\n
For now, there is just the sound of wind blowing up the legs of a woman who dares not even breathe too deeply, as she holds still. There is farcical talk of burritos and Scooby-Doo as they all head to Iowa to see the everyday creatures locked in place<\/a>.<\/p>\n
550 more days of this? Unendurable. Someone will have to crack. Or maybe we all will.<\/p>\n