A Letter to Progressive Christians: “On the Death of Progressive Christianity”

A Letter to Progressive Christians: “On the Death of Progressive Christianity” January 21, 2016
Copyright: openlens / 123RF Stock Photo
Copyright: openlens / 123RF Stock Photo

Dear Fellow Progressive Christians,

I have bad news.

I’m really sorry about this; but, the prognosis came back and I’m afraid its terminal.

Progressive Christianity is done for. Kaput. Finé.

Bummer, right?

Don’t take it out on me. I mean, I’m just the messenger.

The good folks over at “Standing on my Head” (SOMH), on Patheos’ Catholic Channel, compiled all the difficult analysis, historical context, and sound critical thinking about Progressive Christianity’s demise.

By “compiled” I mean, hobbled together via keyboard with the intent of “proving” that the thing they don’t like is very much worth not liking. So, by “difficult analysis” and “historical context” I mean “opinion.”

Still, you get the general gist of what I’m saying. Right?

So, yeah – terminal. Adios Progressive Christianity. Alas, we knew ye well.

But, you know, I feel like it’s rather unfair to just leave the whole “sound critical thinking” thing just sitting there. What I really meant was “riddled with fallacious thinking.”

Here’s an example: without references of any sort, SOMH claims that “Progressive Christians believe religion is a historical accident of circumstances and people…”

What we have here is a straw man fallacy and it’s not-so-cleverly veiled in an apology for painting “with broad strokes.” But, that’s not-so-much painting with broad strokes as it is saying a picture of a dog is actually a picture of a rock in an effort to prove that dogs are not cuddly and have a tendency, when gathered in large numbers, to slide off the side of mountains.

That might be “critical” but it’s very unsound thinking.

SOMH uses several other shell-game tricks to give the argument-that’s-not-an-argument false ground to stand on. One of these tricks is labeling the groups based on their opinion rather than reality.

They claim the label of “historical” for their side of the argument, which shows them to be oblivious to the reality that most Progressive Christians consider themselves “historical” Christians as well.

Perhaps better descriptors for the two groups would be “Traditionalist,” referencing the more conservative wing of the Christian faith’s comfort with dogma and traditions,” and “Progressive,” pointing to a need to move forward without the anchors of “how we’ve always done/understood it. But, I digress.

It. Is. Over.

Eat drink and be merry Progressive Christians! For “tomorrow” we die.

It’s interesting that SOMH claims to paint in very broad strokes, because the article actually presents an astoundingly narrow understanding of Progressive Christianity. And, by painting too fine a picture of what is actually a massive breadth of beliefs in Progressive Christianity, the article ends up creating further straw men arguments.

Ironically, Progressive Christians believe that a breadth of differences and theological perspectives is a strength. The dogmatic, stay-in-line, thinking of traditional Christianity not only seems limiting to us, but also antithetical to Jesus’ love of folks from all different walks of life.

Still, death. It sucks.

If I believed in hell, the whole “death of Progressive Christianity” might really be upsetting to me. Well, that and the fact that the entire article is really nothing more than an attempt to validate the institution as it is. SOMH makes no allowance for the Church to change.

In a not-surprisingly dogmatic take, their position is that the Progressive Christian perspective will cause people to slowly leave the church and ultimately, because of that exodus, the movement will die. (Actually, that and the fact that we like the idea of contraception and therefore will not reproduce little baby Progressive Christians. Yep, really. Their argument, not mine).

But, what SOMH is missing is that progressive churches (that don’t look much like idealized traditional churches) are creating spiritual community in new and exciting ways; progressive churches are nourishing the spirits and theological growth of longtime progressives, newcomers, and a whole new generation of Christians.

It’s a shame really. Those kinds of churches sound so good. But, turn out the lights, the party is over.

If only God was bigger than the Church. If only God were found in life, in nature, and in relationships. Because, I mean, if we can’t keep the progressive Church alive within those walls that contain God on the inside it just like they do in traditional Church, how are we ever going to find God?

Hugs,
Mark

 

 

Consider supporting Mark’s blogging. Help create a market for Progressive Christianity. Not through big publishers or big denominations, but through the grassroots. We need to encourage the growth of progressive Christian voices in the marketplace. Even a dollar will help.
 

Facebook continues to make it increasingly difficult for me to let you know about new blog posts like this. Please consider signing up for my mailing list where we can insure you are notified.Just click here!

Mark is a co-founder of The Christian Left. Come and join the conversation!

"wow. you almost managed to slip some positive words in, probably by mistake. sickened, I ..."

Following Jesus in the Age of ..."
"In your comment here you are giving an example of someone who believes In Fear ..."

Following Jesus in the Age of ..."
"Fair enough, but now we are speaking of what is good policy. What I have ..."

10 Things You Can’t Vote For ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment