![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/1454\/2022\/01\/trans-sexuality-g18bf684ad_1920-300x200.jpg\"){kind=spacer}
Is it possible for a biological male, let\u2019s call him Sam, to be a woman on the inside? If so, how can we know? Does maleness and femaleness reduce to mere internal feelings? Is Sam his body or the \u201cinner self\u201d he believes he\/she<\/em> is, in this case, a woman? These questions seem modern but are in fact quite ancient.<\/p>\nThe roots of the current gender identity<\/em> phenomenon reside in the ancient world of Gnostic Dualism<\/em>. In this entry, I will examine the ancient origins of the current gender identity phenomenon, its current rehashing of an old idea, and how St. Pope John Paul II\u2019s Theology of the Body assists Catholics seeking to address and confront this issue head on.<\/p>\n Dualism<\/em> is generally defined as the belief that an individual human being consists of a body\/spirit (soul) or body\/mind duality. For a more thorough examination of dualism, click here<\/a>. Gnosticism is the ancient belief that knowledge (gnosis<\/em>) provides \u201cthe key to unlocking transcendent understanding, self-realization, and\/or unity with God.\u201d[1]<\/a> Furthermore, gnostic dualism<\/em> plays an important role in this \u201cself-realization,\u201d as matter is viewed as crude\/corrupt, while the spirt\/soul is viewed as the true reality or true person. The \u201cinner person\u201d is the true person, while the outer person (the body) matters little or not at all. Conversely, the body is secondary, an illusion or costume. Matter does not matter, only spirit (the inner person).<\/p>\n All this should sound familiar.<\/p>\n According to Alex Schmider, associate director of transgender representation at GLAAD, gender identity<\/em> entails acknowledging an individual\u2019s preferred personal pronouns. To do so shows respect by \u201creferring to them in a way that\u2019s consistent and true to who they are.\u201d Did you catch that? How one identifies equates to who they truly are. Conversely, to acknowledge a person by their biological sex, if they do not \u201cidentify\u201d as such, constitutes a grave cultural faux pas. In this view, the \u201cinner self\u201d constitutes the true and real self. Therefore, the exterior or physical body (biological sex) is secondary, nothing more than a costume.<\/p>\n NPR (National Public Radio) recently posted an article on their webpage title, A Guide To Gender Identity Terms<\/em><\/a>, in which they provide the following definition of gender identity<\/em> (along with other related definitions):<\/p>\n Gender identity<\/strong> is one\u2019s own internal sense of self<\/strong><\/span> and their gender, whether that is man, woman, neither or both. Unlike gender expression, gender identity is not outwardly visible<\/span><\/strong> to others.<\/p>\n For most people, gender identity aligns with the sex assigned at birth, the American Psychological Association notes. For transgender people, gender identity differs in varying degrees from the sex assigned at birth.<\/span><\/strong><\/span>\u00a0[emphasis added in color by me<\/strong>]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n So, gender identity<\/em> is an internal sense of self<\/em> and gender not outwardly visible<\/em> to others. In the definition above, the outward self (the part of a person attached to biology) gets reduced to mere societal expressions of masculine or feminine. The outward body, now rendered inconsequential, becomes a costume worn to reflect the true \u201cinternal\u201d person.<\/p>\n Moreover, missing from the list of NPR definitions are words like woman<\/em> and man<\/em>. These terms, traditionally associated with biology, now replaced with the adjective cisgender<\/em>. A cisgender<\/em> individual identifies with their sex assigned<\/em> at birth (biological sex is now assigned by medical professionals). Furthermore, how a man knows how it \u201cfeels\u201d to be a woman remains an unknown. The definition of man<\/em> and woman<\/em> would seem foundational to the gender identity<\/em> phenomenon, but such definitions remain unforthcoming and shrouded in mystery.<\/p>\n St. Pope John Paul II\u2019s Theology of the Body affirms that we are our bodies, that is, our biological sex matters. God created humans male and female (Genesis 1:27). God did so for men and women to be \u201cgifts\u201d to one another. In reference to the Manichaean (an ancient Gnostic group that held gnostic dualist <\/em>views) St. Pope John Paul II perfectly summarizes the current gender identity issue<\/em>.<\/p>\n He states:<\/p>\n A Manichaean attitude would lead to an \u201cannihilation\u201d of the body<\/strong><\/span>\u2014if not real, at least intentional\u2014to negation of the value of human sex, of the masculinity and femininity of the human person<\/strong><\/span>, or at least to their mere toleration in the limits of the need delimited by the necessity of procreation.[2]<\/a> \u00a0[emphasis in color added by me<\/strong>]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Gender identity<\/em> annihilates the reality of biological sex and replaces it with a nebulous concept of gender identity <\/em>as the true \u201csense of self.\u201d<\/p>\n Regarding the \u201cgift\u201d of male and female, he writes:<\/p>\n They [men and women] communicate in the fullness of humanity, which is manifested in them as reciprocal complementarity precisely because they are \u201cmale\u201d and \u201cfemale.\u201d At the same time, they communicate on the basis of that communion of persons in which, through femininity and masculinity, they become a gift for each other. In this way they reach in reciprocity a special understanding of the meaning of their own body<\/span>.[3]<\/a> <\/strong>[emphasis in color added by me<\/strong>]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n In the reciprocal complementarity of \u201cmale\u201d and \u201cfemale,\u201d individuals come to understand the meaning of their bodies. If we deny this reality, we risk falling into the errors of the ancient Gnostics, like the Manichaean. God created men and women with bodies He declared as good. To deny these bodies and their reality is to declare our bodies are the opposite of good. Moreover, if we believe that the \u201cinner\u201d person contradicts the \u201couter\u201d person, we declare God a liar. Furthermore, if we compel others to use \u201cpreferred\u201d pronouns that likewise contradict the reality of biological sex, we compel them to lie, too.<\/p>\n God created male and female humans. God did not create males in female bodies and females in male bodies. Catholicism, via Theology of the Body, teaches there is no difference between the \u201cinner\u201d person and the \u201couter\u201d person. We are our bodies and our bodies matter. Our bodies are gifts from God and God makes no mistakes. Gender dysphoria<\/em><\/a> and intersex people exist, but this does not entail people born in the wrong bodies. It means that they, like all people, need to understand how God made them and embrace the truth of how they were made. God created us with biological sex for us to be \u201cgifts\u201d to one another.<\/p>\n Let us not fall for the ancient error of Gnostic Dualism<\/em>. Our bodies are good, just as God made them.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n [1]<\/a> Gnosticism<\/em>. Gnosticism \u2013 New World Encyclopedia. (n.d.). Retrieved January 21, 2022, from https:\/\/www.newworldencyclopedia.org\/entry\/Gnosticism#Modern_Gnosticism<\/a><\/p>\n [2]<\/a> The theology of the body by John Paul II<\/em>. (n.d.). Retrieved January 26, 2022, from https:\/\/d2y1pz2y630308.cloudfront.net\/2232\/documents\/2016\/9\/theology_of_the_body.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n [3]<\/a> Ibid.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Like what you read? Please check out my other writing\u00a0here<\/a>.<\/p>\nAncient Identity Crisis <\/strong><\/h3>\n
Modern Identity Crisis<\/strong><\/h3>\n
Definition of Gender Identity <\/strong><\/h3>\n
Theology of the Body and Gender Identity<\/strong><\/h3>\n
The Gift of Male and Female<\/h3>\n
We Are Our Bodies<\/strong><\/h3>\n