It took a few minutes for leaders of the Bisexual, Gay & Lesbian Alliance at Rutgers University to realize something was wrong at their back-to-school meeting.<\/p>\n\n
The hall was full of unfamiliar students wanting to become members. Most were carrying Bibles with markers in the first chapter of St. Paul\u2019s Epistle to the Romans. They also had copies of the campus policy forbidding discrimination on the basis of \u201crace, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, age, sex, sexual orientation, disability, marital or veteran status.\u201d<\/p>\n\n
Truth is, this scene hasn\u2019t happened at Rutgers or anywhere else \u2014 so far.<\/p>\n\n
What if it did?<\/p>\n\n
What if conservative Christians tried to rush a gay-rights group and elect new leaders? What if, when told they couldn\u2019t join because they rejected its core beliefs, evangelicals cited cases in which Christian groups were punished for refusing leadership roles to homosexuals? What if, when jeered by angry homosexuals, evangelicals called this verbal violence rooted in religious bigotry and, thus, harassment?<\/p>\n\n
\u201cNo, no, no. I have never heard of a case in which conservative Catholics, Protestants or Jews tried to turn the tables in this fashion,\u201d said historian Alan Charles Kors, president of the Philadelphia-based Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE)<\/p>\n\n
\u201cThat would never happen. There is an inherent meekness \u2026 among students of faith on all these campuses. It\u2019s so ironic that people call them intolerant and offensive. Most of these religious students are among the last people who would ever go where they are not wanted. All they want is to be free to express their beliefs.\u201d<\/p>\n\n
But there have been a growing number of cases in which traditional religious groups have been attacked because their \u201cintolerant\u201d beliefs and policies offend modern academia. Almost all of these cases are collisions between ancient moral doctrines and campus policies that defend and promote the Sexual Revolution.<\/p>\n\n
The bottom line, according to recent FIRE legal guides, is that almost all campus policies that inhibit religious practices also inhibit the constitutional rights of free speech, association and assembly. Public colleges and universities are not supposed to make doctrinal decisions that deny privileges to some religious groups that are then extended to other secular or religious groups.<\/p>\n\n
Yet that is what is happening.<\/p>\n\n
\u201cReligious liberty is now center stage in the battle for freedom on campus,\u201d according to David French, a Harvard Law School graduate who wrote the manual covering disputes over faith issues. \u201cReligious students are particularly convenient targets. After all, they think and behave in ways that many other students don\u2019t understand; they tend to be small minorities on most campuses; and \u2014 by religious conviction \u2014 they often resist even the most heavy-handed repression.\u201d<\/p>\n\n
For all of their talk about \u201cdiversity\u201d and \u201ctolerance,\u201d French is convinced many academic leaders think that \u201cthe fewer \u2018fanatics\u2019 \u2014 of the \u2018wrong\u2019 kind \u2014 the better.\u201d<\/p>\n\n
While these campus disputes are often described in terms of \u201cleft\u201d and \u201cright,\u201d the FIRE project (www.thefireguides.org) has been endorsed by a diverse coalition of activists ranging from Edwin Meese III, attorney general in the Reagan administration, to American Civil Liberties Union President Nadine Strossen.<\/p>\n\n
The key is that academic leaders must be honest, said French. Leaders at state schools are quickly learning that their work is covered by explicit laws that ban any \u201cviewpoint discrimination\u201d that blesses some believers and curses others. Religious schools, meanwhile, are allowed to require particular beliefs and practices \u2014 mandatory chapel, moral codes, doctrinal statements for faculty \u2014 if these rules are clearly stated in writing.<\/p>\n\n
Right now, the toughest battles are at some of America\u2019s most prestigious private colleges and universities. These secular schools once encouraged fierce debates and proudly tolerated dissent. But now, it seems that some worldviews are created more equal than others.<\/p>\n\n
Many religious believers do not discover this reality until they arrive on campus and receive copies of the all-powerful student handbook.<\/p>\n\n
\u201cStudents must be told the truth,\u201d said French. \u201cThey should not be duped into believing that they have enrolled in a school that respects their beliefs and their freedom to express viewpoints that are out of the so-called mainstream. These secular schools must be more honest in their recruiting materials and catalogues. This is a truth in advertising issue.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
It took a few minutes for leaders of the Bisexual, Gay & Lesbian Alliance at Rutgers University to realize something was wrong at their back-to-school meeting. The hall was full of unfamiliar students wanting to become members. Most were carrying Bibles with markers in the first chapter of St. Paul\u2019s Epistle to the Romans. They […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":610,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[211,246,1534,362,373,459,894],"class_list":["post-1243","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-church-and-state","tag-colleges","tag-evangelicals","tag-first-amendment","tag-free-speech","tag-intervarsity","tag-universities"],"yoast_head":"\n