{"id":415,"date":"2010-06-14T16:03:00","date_gmt":"2010-06-14T16:03:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/unequallyyoked\/2010\/06\/lessons-in-the-lacunae-the-omitted-scripture\/"},"modified":"2012-03-26T23:36:35","modified_gmt":"2012-03-27T03:36:35","slug":"lessons-in-the-lacunae-the-omitted-scripture","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/unequallyyoked\/2010\/06\/lessons-in-the-lacunae-the-omitted-scripture.html","title":{"rendered":"Lessons in the Lacunae: The Omitted Scripture"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

While looking up the readings for this week\u2019s Mass in the Catholic liturgical calendar, I noticed that the Old Testament readings skipped around in the chosen chapters. I\u2019ve looked up these omissions before, and usually the gap is just an irrelevant sidenote (a timestamp for the event, some geographical digression, etc). However, this week the meaning of the passage is distorted by the edit. (passage below, cut sections in bold)<\/p>\n

7<\/span> Thus says the LORD God of Israel: \u2018I anointed you king of Israel. I rescued you from the hand of Saul. 8<\/span> I gave you your lord\u2019s house and your lord\u2019s wives for your own. I gave you the house of Israel and of Judah. And if this were not enough, I could count up for you still more. 9 <\/span>Why have you spurned the LORD and done evil in his sight? You have cut down Uriah the Hittite with the sword; you took his wife as your own, and him you killed with the sword of the Ammonites. 10<\/span> Now, therefore, the sword shall never depart from your house, because you have despised me and have taken the wife of Uriah to be your wife.\u2019 [<\/strong><\/em>11<\/span><\/strong><\/em> Thus says the LORD: \u2018I will bring evil upon you out of your own house. I will take your wives while you live to see it, and will give them to your neighbor. He shall lie with your wives in broad daylight. <\/strong><\/em>12<\/span><\/em><\/strong> You have done this deed in secret, but I will bring it about in the presence of all Israel, and with the sun looking down.'\u201d]<\/strong><\/em> 13<\/span> Then David said to Nathan, \u201cI have sinned against the LORD.\u201d Nathan answered David: \u201cThe LORD on his part has forgiven your sin: you shall not die. [<\/em><\/strong>14<\/span><\/em><\/strong> But since you have utterly spurned the LORD by this deed, the child born to you must surely die.\u201d]<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The Catholic edit is deceptive. As amended, the story of David and Bathsheba is a model of repentance followed by Christian forgiveness, perfectly matched to the Gospel reading of Luke 7:36-50<\/a>. The unexpurgated version of 2 Samuel tells a story of vengeance visited by god on the innocent in the form of rape and murder. It\u2019s not for nothing that atheist evangels like Richard Dawkins and The Devil\u2019s Highlighter<\/a> seize on this story as an example of the immorality of the Bible\u2019s teachings.<\/p>\n

Since it was my first week visiting the Catholic church near my work in DC (and I haven\u2019t outed myself as an atheist there yet), I didn\u2019t want to ask the local priest about the omission. Luckily, my boyfriend was willing to take it up with the priests in his home parish.<\/p>\n

According to his priests, Christians shouldn\u2019t accept this as a true story about God. Plenty of the Old Testament, the priests said, is allegorical, confused, or flat out false. It was refreshing to hear religious leaders speak frankly about the scriptures, but I wish they\u2019s done it from the pulpit.<\/p>\n

The fact that the Bible is a flawed document is not a disproof of Christianity. Although some sola scriptura<\/em> Protestants may be felled by stories like 2 Samuel 12, Catholics claim Sacred Tradition as a way of winnowing out the chaff. If Christianity is true, it should be sufficiently robust to withstand this kind of discussion and emerge the stronger.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

However, avoiding the question by skipping over the challenging parts doesn\u2019t give me a great deal of confidence in the validity of Christianity. It seems to demonstrate a desire to protect the laity from doubt to the point of swaddling them. Makes you wonder how seriously you need to take a faith that must hide to survive.<\/p>\n

So, this week\u2019s Call to Arms is for primarily for Christians:<\/p>\n