Right now the United States is immersed in a flurry of political wrangling, our two major parties wrapping up, or about to begin, major conventions that they hope will sell their candidate to an increasingly disaffected electorate. For those of us who exist on the margins of America\u2019s tapestry of faith and religion, it can seem doubly alienating. A celebration of what we are not.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Certainly there have been inroads, the Republican National Convention invited a Sikh to give an opening invocation<\/a> (albeit one you could only see on C-SPAN<\/a>), and the Democratic National Convention has enshrined marriage equality in their national platform<\/a>, but for the most part these events are exercises in affirming a certain bland, comfortable, (mostly) non-controversial all-American idiom (from different political lenses, to be sure). They are not, despite what activists from both sides desire, moments that dare confront or change the status quo. No one will be forced to confront, as Brian Jay Stanley was, their own prejudices or assumptions.<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cBefore college I was a skeptic and rationalist toward every religion except my own, Christianity. Like most of humanity, I had believed the religion I\u2019d heard first, and on its authority dismissed all the religions I\u2019d heard second. Seeing Muslims wearing turbans or Hindus bindis, I thought the oddity of their customs proved the error of their beliefs. Studying all faiths in one class in college, however, I saw my religion from the outside and realized that the rites of my Sundays \u2014 warbling choirs and smocked babies dipped in silver fonts and bread as the body of Christ \u2014 were as curious as what I had disparaged as myths. In class discussions I sometimes unwittingly revealed assumptions that I thought were axioms, and would read surprise in the eyes of a Hare Krishna or Bahai. My notion of normal was an accident of my birth and upbringing. Whomever I saw as strange saw me as strange. I had raised a doubtful brow at Buddhists bowing to golden statues, even as I prayed weekly to a crucified first-century Jew, not realizing that either all religions are bizarre or none is.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n As\u00a0Jeffrey Weiss at RealClearReligion notes, the slow demographic shift away from institutional faiths, the rise of \u201cnones,\u201d those claiming to particular religion, have yet to be eagerly courted by either party, particularly the Republicans<\/a>.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u201cWhere religion came up in Tampa last week, at least among the best-known and prime-time speakers, it was mostly in reference to a fairly specific notion of God. The speakers used language most familiar to a particular reading of Christianity. To be fair, much of the language would also have been familiar in the mid-1700s, as America\u2019s founders crafted their exquisite balance of freedoms and responsibilities.\u00a0But today, as many as one American in five belongs to the religious \u201cNones,\u201d depending on the polls you\u00a0read<\/a>. That\u2019s a huge leap from a couple of decades ago. And members of this group are far more likely to describe themselves as political independents than people who say they ascribe to any particular religion. They may have been more turned off than inspired by the way the Republicans wove religion and politics together.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n This isn\u2019t a uniquely Republican problem, as the Democrats aren\u2019t exactly eager to give non-Christians a prime-time voice<\/a>. Both seek to keep Christians in their base, while hoping their policy stances will appeal to non-Christians who will overlook all the monotheistic God talk. Change, it seems, happens in frustratingly small increments. No one is forced to deal with people \u201cwho don\u2019t have the slightest similarity to us,\u201d <\/em><\/a>even within the \u201cbig tent\u201d of our national parties, and that\u2019s a shame. That said, CNN believes the Democratic convention will be less \u201cfaith-y\u201d (ie less Christian) than four years ago<\/a>, but it\u2019s all speculation at this point.<\/p>\n Happening in the shadow of the \u201cvalues voter\u201d election of 2004, the 2008 Democratic convention was something of a faith fest, especially when it came to evangelicals. Convention roles went to the Rev. Joel Hunter, a megapastor from Florida, and best-selling Christian author Don Miller. This year, some religious activists are quietly wondering if the convention will come off as more secular. Hunter, who remains close to Obama, is skipping Charlotte. \u201cThere\u2019s no reason for me to be there,\u201d he told us. \u201cMy relationship with the president is pastoral and not political.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Let me be clear, this is not a \u201cboth parties are the same\u201d argument, I think there are clear and definable differences in policy between the Democrats and Republicans. I trust my readers are intelligent enough to discern where their interests lie in those matters, as The Wild Hunt doesn\u2019t endorse candidates. However, both parties do have a \u201creligion\u201d problem, and it isn\u2019t the problem of appealing to\u00a0Christians of various\u00a0inclinations.<\/p>\n The problem is that both parties have been slow to embrace real pluralism and religious diversity in their one prime-time 3-day infomercial to the American people (and in certain senses, the world). This may not be a problem for this election cycle, but it is increasingly going to be an issue as that slow demographic shift keeps on shifting, and more states start to be evenly divided between Christians on one side, with \u201cnones\u201d and \u201cothers\u201d on the other. The \u201cunchurched\u201d (non-Christian) vote is going to be a real thing in the years to come<\/a>, and we\u2019re a frustratingly diverse demographic. Asian-Americans are a key growth point for non-Abrahamic religions<\/a>\u00a0across the country, while\u00a0a whopping 12% of state residents are adherents of a New Age, Pagan, or esoteric faith<\/a>s\u00a0in Colorado, with another 20% fitting into the \u201cnone\u201d category. These are growing populations that can\u2019t be ignored forever.<\/p>\n Both parties need to embrace the \u201ccommunion of strangers,\u201d<\/a> and realize that pluralism is the core value regarding religion in America. Both parties need to either embrace the full tapestry of faith in their conventions, or they need to stop pandering to religious groups entirely. That isn\u2019t so strange a notion, as it wasn\u2019t until our modern era that faith became so politicized that we injected it into the very fabric of partisan politics<\/a>. Of course, it used to be a given that we were all Christians, and that all \u201cothers\u201d lived here by our\u00a0sufferance. Still, one direction or another needs to be taken, or the parties will soon find themselves catering to ever-smaller slices of the demographic pie until it will a case of change or die. My hope is that secularism can stop being a dirty word, and we can simply get down to the business of rationally hashing out our policy differences without invoking divine backing to bolster an argument. If not now, then soon.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Right now the United States is immersed in a flurry of political wrangling, our two major parties wrapping up, or about to begin, major conventions that they hope will sell their candidate to an increasingly disaffected electorate. For those of us who exist on the margins of America\u2019s tapestry of faith and religion, it can […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,6],"tags":[14,591,592,1842,1861,1880,3577,1976,2118],"class_list":["post-10271","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-paganism","category-religion","tag-2012-presidential-race","tag-democratic-national-convention","tag-democratic-party","tag-pluralism","tag-politics","tag-presidential-election","tag-republican-national-convention","tag-republican-party","tag-secularism"],"yoast_head":"\n