Ever since his religious affiliation was outed to the general public back in 2009<\/a>, Republican Dan Halloran has tried to keep the subject off his adherence to Theodish Heathenism<\/a>, and on day-to-day political matters. After his Heathen faith became an issue<\/a> in the successful 2009 campaign for a seat on the New York City Council, he finally released a public statement entitled \u201cI believe in God,\u201d<\/a> which downplayed his Pagan identity, and stressed Halloran\u2019s Catholic heritage.<\/p>\n \u201cI took comfort in my family\u2019s history and our heritage<\/strong>, yet through all of this pain and hardship, I never lost faith in God<\/strong>.\u00a0Last week, I was attacked for my faith in the Queens Tribune.These attacks happened on the eve of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, the holiest time of the year for the Jewish people. Having been raised in a Catholic household that shares its religious roots with the Jewish faith, I was deeply offended that religion would be used for political gain. <\/strong>[\u2026]\u00a0I am a man of faith<\/strong> \u2013 and now my faith is under attack by a newspaper working for my opponent.\u00a0I call on my opponent to disavow the Queens Tribune\u2019s attack on religion. I am running a campaign on the issues.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Not once in the statement does Halloran mention the terms \u201cHeathen,\u201d \u201cTheodish,\u201d or \u201cPagan.\u201d \u00a0A fact that soured many in the Heathen community to Halloran, believing that they were \u201cthrown under the bus\u201d<\/a> so he could win the election. From that point, Halloran has steered clear of talking\u00a0explicitly\u00a0about his faith, even when journalists dug up former co-religionists who made allegations relating to his leadership role within Theodism<\/a>. In a 2010 interview with the Pagan Newswire Collective<\/a>, Halloran reiterated that his faith is private, and\u00a0\u201cirrelevant\u201d<\/em> to any policy decision he might make.<\/p>\n \u201cMy service in the Council and advocacy for our neighborhoods has proven beyond a shadow of doubt that my religious faith is not only irrelevant to my public policy\u2026 but also a source of great personal strength for me which only inures to the benefit of my Community.<\/strong> I do occasionally hear that being a \u201cDruid\u201d explains why I am such an eco-conscious Republican.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n However, it now seems like Halloran may be willingly (if unwittingly) opening the \u201cblack box\u201d<\/a> of his religion by attacking one of his potential Democratic opponents in the upcoming congressional race<\/a>. In an interview with\u00a0the Jewish political blog Gestetner Updates<\/em><\/a>,\u00a0Halloran praises Assemblyman Rory Lancman<\/a> as his toughest potential opponent, but also\u00a0claims his voting record doesn\u2019t reflect his personal faith<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cUnfortunately his voting record does not match his personal commitment to his faith<\/strong>,\u201d he said. \u201cHe was on the opposite side of gay marriage; opposite side of abortion<\/strong>; and the opposite side on the issues of school vouchers, and tax credits and incentives for those who use private schools to educate our young children.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n In short, Halloran kinda implied that Lancman may be a bad Jew when it comes to these issues, echoing the criticisms of conservative New York Jews<\/a>. That may seem like good politics when you\u2019re trying to win over moderate and conservative Jews, but it also opens the \u201cblack box\u201d of his own religion, making him fair game for similar questions and statements. Considering the fact that the Village Voice has already attacked Halloran for being a hypocrite<\/a>, specifically on the question of abortion, it doesn\u2019t seem wise to run on abortion and same-sex marriage.<\/p>\n \u201cIn early 2011, a legislative fight emerged in New York City over anti-abortion \u201cpregnancy centers\u201d advertising abortion counseling when they don\u2019t actually offer abortions.\u00a0City Council Speaker Christine Quinn introduced a bill that would force such organizations to advertise that they don\u2019t perform abortions and to disclose if they have any medical staff on hand. \u00a0[\u2026]\u00a0Quinn\u2019s bill would eventually pass overwhelmingly in the council without Halloran\u2019s vote. According to\u00a0Little Neck Patch, Halloran \u201cdid not see the issue . . . as a part of the decades-old debate over abortion rights.\u201d (Still, through a spokesman, he also noted \u201cthe Council member is pro-life.\u201d) [\u2026]\u00a0The episode infuriated some of Halloran\u2019s former followers, who not only had known him to be pro-choice, but also to be \u201cpro-abortion to nearly the point of endorsing infanticide,\u201d as one put it.<\/strong>\u201c<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n The Voice piece quotes Halloran at length defending abortion within the context of his faith, and while I publicly criticized the piece for crossing the line<\/a>, this new interview now partially undercuts my argument that \u201ctoo much is made of his faith, and in improper contexts.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n I can only think of three possibilities for why Halloran has decided to bring up same-sex marriage and abortion in the context of a potential opponent\u2019s religion: that it was a mistake, that he felt it was a calculated risk worth the potential blowback, or he\u2019s hoping to preemptively make the religion question moot by muddying the waters now, instead of during the general election. Whatever the reason, it just seems risky to open yourself up for attack after you\u2019ve spent years saying your religion isn\u2019t an issue for public debate or commentary.<\/p>\n In the coming weeks I\u2019ll be highlighting a two-part guest commentary from our\u00a0resident Theodism expert Nick Ritter<\/a> on what Theodism is and isn\u2019t, and the political career and congressional candidacy of Dan Halloran from a Theodish perspective. I feel that as this campaign heats up, it will be important to talk to voices who can bring more light to the issues that will no doubt be raised regarding religion. In the meantime you can listen to my podcast featuring Nick Ritter and PNC-Minnesota reporter Cara Schulz on Halloran\u2019s congressional run<\/a>. I fear we\u2019re going to be hearing a lot about Halloran\u2019s faith in the mainstream media come November, and we should be prepared for what that might mean for the broader Pagan and Heathen communities.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Ever since his religious affiliation was outed to the general public back in 2009, Republican Dan Halloran has tried to keep the subject off his adherence to Theodish Heathenism, and on day-to-day political matters. After his Heathen faith became an issue in the successful 2009 campaign for a seat on the New York City Council, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,6],"tags":[537,968,1206,1209,1622,1623,3269,1861,1976,3364,2456],"class_list":["post-9673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-paganism","category-religion","tag-dan-halloran","tag-heathen","tag-journalism","tag-judaism","tag-new-york","tag-new-york-city-council","tag-nick-ritter","tag-politics","tag-republican-party","tag-rory-lancman","tag-theodism"],"yoast_head":"\n