Federal judge: sueing diocese that employed child-raping priests could burden a person’s exercise of religion.

Federal judge: sueing diocese that employed child-raping priests could burden a person’s exercise of religion. August 5, 2013

Remember when Timothy Dolan shuffled a bunch of the Milwaukee diocese’s money into a cemetery fund to protect it from being seized to settle cases with the victims of child-raping priests in the Milwaukee diocese.  A federal judge has just ruled that the money hidden in that fund cannot be re-absorbed to the diocese’s assets to settle lawsuits because doing so would “burden someone’s right to exercise religion.”

I’m not joking.

The case involves approximately $57 million that former Milwaukee Archbishop Timothy Dolan transferred from the archdiocese’s general accounts to into a separate trust set up to maintain the church’s cemeteries. Although Dolan, who is now a cardinal, the Archbishop of New York and the President of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, has denied that the purpose of this transfer was to shield the funds from lawsuits, Dolan penned a letter to the Vatican in 2007 where he explained that transferring the funds into the trust would lead to “an improved protection of these funds from any legal claim and liability.”

The issue facing the court is, essentially, whether the funds that Dolan split off into a separate trust can now be reabsorbed into the archdiocese’s assets in order to enable sex abuse victims and other creditors to be paid out of these assets. In holding that these funds cannot be so absorbed, Randa relies on a law that limits the federal government’s ability to “substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion,” Randa cites to the current Archbishop of Milwaukee’s statement that “the care and maintenance of Catholic cemeteries, cemetery property, and the remains of those interred is a fundamental exercise of the Catholic faith,” and concludes that this statement alone is enough to shield the church’s funds. As Randa explains, “if the Trust’s funds are converted into the bankruptcy estate, there will be no funds or, at best, insufficient funds for the perpetual care of the Milwaukee Catholic Cemeteries.”

And that ain’t the end of it.

And Randa does not stop there. He goes on to argue that senior church officials get to unilaterally decide what constitutes a “substantial burden” on their faith for purposes of federal law — “Archbishop Listecki’s declaration stands unopposed, and on the issue of religious doctrine, it is unassailable. Moreover, the issue of substantial burden is essentially coterminous with religious doctrine.” In this case, an archbishop declared cemetery funds to be untouchable in a bankruptcy proceeding, but Randa’s reasoning could extend much farther. Nothing in his opinion would prevent a church’s officials from declaring that every single line in every single ledger kept by the church is mandated by the sacred word of God — and therefore every single dollar owned by the church is untouchable so long as the church engages in the kind of accounting gymnastics Dolan allegedly performed.

So if you wrong someone as a regular person or institution and they sue you, you will have to make it right to the extent you’re able.  If you wrong someone as a church and they sue you, you can get off lightly or entirely because…you’re a church.

And yet, how often does every Pope pay lip service to justice?

"Your ignorance speaks for itself."

40 harmful effects of Christianity.
"I think you just demonstrated the point exactly.Well done."

40 harmful effects of Christianity.
"It's extraordinarily ironic to me that Xtians, who have spread nothing but hate, intolerance and ..."

40 harmful effects of Christianity.
"Faith is deciding you know an answer without any justification.People kill other people on "faith". ..."

40 harmful effects of Christianity.

Browse Our Archives

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment