![\"\"](\"https:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/_dmDaLWNETzg\/SpF-lez2AhI\/AAAAAAAAAFM\/s7F3J8dRqqA\/s1600-h\/dd_yng.jpg\")
<\/a>Dorothy Day was more my political cup of tea: a hunger-striking, pro\u2013Civil Rights, anti\u2013Vietnam War, out-on-the-picket-lines kind of gal. Funny that I didn\u2019t know about her in the 1960s, but only discovered her as a fellow convert last year.<\/p>\nA radical socialist writer in her twenties, Day ended her first pregnancy with an abortion she later regretted deeply. When she became pregnant again, by a man she loved, she chose to have the child baptized in the Catholic Church even though it meant losing her (atheist) lover. When a nun told her that she herself should convert if her child was going to be a Catholic, Day agreed\u2014and began a lifelong journey of faith.<\/p>\n
Committed to the working man and woman, she combined social activism with Christian devotion by founding The Catholic Worker, a newspaper that sold for one cent. Its mission was to lure workers away from communism (this was the 1930s) and to show them that the Church had a viable social program for them as well. Inspired by the itinerant evangelist Peter Maurin, she opened the first Catholic Worker House of Hospitality in New York City a year later.<\/p>\n
Her autobiography, The Long Loneliness, <\/span>is one of the great spiritual memoirs I have read. Day\u2019s cause for beatification and canonization was formally opened with Vatican approval in 2000.<\/p>\n Here is a beautiful bit from Dorothy Day\u2019s book Loaves and Fishes:<\/span><\/p>\n Someone once described me in an interview as \u201cauthoritative.\u201d Later, listening to a tape recording of a talk I had given on the plight of agricultural workers, I had to admit that I did sound didactic. . . . If I am didactic it is because Peter Maurin was my teacher, because he gave me principles to live by and lessons to study, and because I am so convinced of the rightness of his proposals.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cHow can you be so sure?\u201d Mike Wallace once asked me in a television interview. He spoke with wonder rather than irritation, because he felt my confidence was rooted in religion. I told him that unless I felt sure I would not speak at all. If I were ever visited by doubts\u2014either religious ones or doubts about my vocation in this movement\u2014I would accept it as a temptation, as a great suffering that I must share with so much of the world today. <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n Even then, deep within, I would be sure; even though I said to myself, \u201cI believe because I want to believe, I hope because I want to hope, I love because I want to love.\u201d These very desires would be regarded by God as He regarded those of Daniel, who was called a man of desires, and whom He rewarded.<\/p>\n Dorothy Day was more my political cup of tea: a hunger-striking, pro\u2013Civil Rights, anti\u2013Vietnam War, out-on-the-picket-lines kind of gal. Funny that I didn\u2019t know about her in the 1960s, but only discovered her as a fellow convert last year. A radical socialist writer in her twenties, Day ended her first pregnancy with an abortion she […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":143,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1749","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n