{"id":6515,"date":"2012-04-13T14:47:31","date_gmt":"2012-04-13T19:47:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/theamericanjesus.net\/?p=6515"},"modified":"2012-04-13T14:47:31","modified_gmt":"2012-04-13T19:47:31","slug":"crock-o-duck-disproves-evolution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/zackhunt\/2012\/04\/crock-o-duck-disproves-evolution\/","title":{"rendered":"‘Crock-O-Duck’ Disproves Evolution?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

First, it was the banana that Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron claimed disproved evolution<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Then, they learned how fruit is cultivated and gave up that\u00a0endeavor.<\/p>\n

Well, if your first ridiculous claim is proven false, what are you supposed to do next?<\/p>\n

Admit that you are in fact not experts in evolutionary biology.<\/del> Come up with an even more ridiculous claim!<\/p>\n

According to the crowned princes of street evangelism, their imaginary \u201cCrock-O-Duck\u201d is just as ridiculous as the notion of a missing link in evolution and therefore disproves the entire theory of evolution. As Comfort explains, \u201cif evolutionist can come up with imaginary missing links, why can\u2019t we?\u201d<\/p>\n

Sigh<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Maybe one day Ray and Kirk will realize that science isn\u2019t something you \u201cbelieve in\u201d, it\u2019s something you try to understand.<\/p>\n

Until then, we get to suffer through<\/del> enjoy \u201cCrock-O-Duck\u201d\u2026..<\/p>\n