There were seventeen op-ed pieces listed for Wednesday morning, September 28. Of those seventeen, at least eleven of the entries for that morning (and, arguably, perhaps more) are devoted to the election.
Now (comparing apples to apples) take a look at the leads in the politics section of The New York Times for the same date:
Christie Adds Little New, but Fails to Quell the Talk—Michael D. Shear and Jennifer Medina
After Speech, Christie Revels in Pleas to Run
Seizing Populist Mantle, Obama Pushes Jobs Bill—Mark Landler
Short-Term Fixes That Take Time and Resolve Little—Jennifer Steinhauer
There are four "news" stories here. (The Times throws in the story about the governor of New Jersey "reveling" and we all know how significant "reveling" is.) Three of them deal with the election.
Bottom line? You would be hard pressed to get an education in statecraft from our news correspondents, the candidates, or the incumbent—never mind guidance in making morally responsible decisions.
That is why it saddens me to listen to my Christian friends talk about politics. It's rare to find anything that is distinctively Christian, mindful of the complexities, and rooted in anything more than the campaign speeches of their political favorites. The tiresome, sad thing about our political discourse is that we are the ideal targets of a political campaign: We join the bandwagons left and right, we parrot the wisdom of our politicians, and then we offer up our God as a bonus. Talk about taking the name of God in vain.
It is time for Christians to begin looking for moral grounding. But we won't find it out there in the speeches we are all hearing. The exercise of reason in the Christian tradition is reasoning with the resources of our faith. When we begin to do that, our moral grounding will cut across the comfortable divides, advocate for something larger, and make all of the politicians uncomfortable.
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In