The Inherent Contradiction in God’s Not Dead 2 April 18, 2016

The Inherent Contradiction in God’s Not Dead 2

Brian Dalton (a.k.a. Mr. Deity) offers his take on God’s Not Dead 2.

(Spoiler: He’s not a fan.)

WayOfTheMisterGND2

He makes a great point that, at the end of the movie, the filmmakers include a list of actual court cases that supposedly show Christian persecution… yet, the movie uses a purely fictional case as the basis for the story.

Why is that? Could it be that the cases offered by the filmmakers don’t show real persecution? Could it be that they are almost all cases involving Christian business owners depriving employees of comprehensive health care and discriminating against LGBT customers?

They’re not the persecuted ones. They’re the ones doing the persecuting.

"The way republican politics are going these days, that means the winner is worse than ..."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."
"It would have been more convincing if he used then rather than than."

It’s Moving Day for the Friendly ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
error: Content is protected !!