"Like" the Patheos Evangelical Page on Facebook to receive today's best commentary on Evangelical issues.

Jesus seemed to favor John. Somehow God playing favorites, however, doesn't quite jibe with the theology I was raised on. The God I learned about in Sunday School is the one who shows absolute equality in his expressions of love toward all people. He doesn't have "favorites." God loves everyone the same. Right? The Jesus I learned about on the front pew is one who would never think of playing favorites. "Jesus loves the sinner on skid row just as much as he loves the pastor. He loves us all the same." At least, that's what I was told.

Still, it appears the Jesus I read about in the Bible did have a favorite, a favorite disciple, or should I say favored? If nowhere else, it shows up in John's Gospel. On no less than five occasions, John described himself as "the disciple whom Jesus loved" (Jn. 13:23, 19:26, 20:2, 21:7, 20).

Clearly, if Jesus did not have a favorite disciple, John must have thought otherwise. Yes, those familiar with the Gospel narratives know that there was a select Three among the Twelve: namely, Peter, James and John. Theologians refer to them as the Triumvirate, those in whom Jesus confided more than the other Nine. They were with Christ at the peak of his glory and the depths of his despair, at the Mount of Transfiguration and in the Garden of Gethsemane. But, John was clearly the closest.

Howard Ferrin explains it this way:

If Peter and James were first among the twelve, John was first in the affection of his Lord. [Five times] in his Gospel he is designated as "the disciple whom Jesus loved." Did not Jesus love all of His disciples? Indeed He did, but it does seem that John was more beloved by our Lord than were the other disciples. At first this thought is quite startling, but if we think deeply we have here an argument for the complete humanity of our Lord. Is it not a familiar fact that as human beings we love some more than others? We may argue against it, but even among our most intimate friends, we find those with whom we are more spiritually akin than others. If our Lord was fully man, sharing with us in all of our experiences, we should not be surprised to learn that Jesus found his "kindred soul" in John. Perhaps another reason for this lies in the fact that if Jesus was to be known as fully as possible by mortal man, there had to be one among the disciples to whom Jesus would more fully disclose Himself than to any other.

John the Beloved was that man. He held a place of high privilege in relationship to Christ. There was a level of openness and sharing which no one of John's peers ever knew. Was that because no one else ever aspired to such a close walk? Or was it simply providentially ordained to be just that way? Was John just incredibly diligent and devoted or did he possess a unique God‑given grace? I believe the answer is yes to all of the above. John had a spiritual predisposition to being incredibly absorbent and open. And yet, this was a God-given grace, one which he did not resist. Did others possess it as well? Perhaps. The difference with John is that he did something about it. He followed. He responded. He learned to sit at Jesus' feet. While others talked and made idle promises, John listened. He pondered. He grew. And Jesus took notice.