Alabama, Abortion, and the Hopeful Art of Listening

Alabama, Abortion, and the Hopeful Art of Listening May 17, 2019

If you haven’t been following the news this last week, Alabama’s the talk of the town.

On Tuesday night, with a 25-6 vote, the Senate passed the Alabama Human Life Protection Act, a bill that threatens to criminalize doctors who perform abortions. Even in cases of rape and incest (which Democrats sought to ratify in a failed amendment), the new bill remains and will go into effect in six months’ time.

Pixabay :: SplitShire

Now, here’s the deal: although one could argue that this law is a complete political ploy, we have to lay politics aside for a minute here. We have to put our card-carrying blue cards and red cards to the side, and lay our donkeys and our elephants to rest for just a few minutes.

I’ll also be the first to tell you that I do not major in political commentary, even if I try out the phrase “political junkie” every once in awhile at the dinner table. Instead (and as you may have read in my book), I am a listener and a learner, a studier of people and, maybe like you, a person who seeks to not only hear, but truly honor every side of the story – because when we take the time to listen to another person’s story, we can’t help but be changed.

When it comes to this week’s news, I can’t help but wonder how we might better listen to the stories of women – women whose real, fleshy lives have something the rest of us need to hear.

I think of my friend, Shannon, who continues to share her story (of pregnancy when she was twelve years old, after being repeatedly raped by family members) with bravery and courage, over and over again week. In one interview, she centered on the power of story, of humanizing those who will  ultimately be affected by this vote: If we’re sitting down from one another with a cup of coffee, would you respond the same way with your voting?

How might listening to Shannon’s story change the trajectory of the bill? 

I think of Donna Quinn, a nun who calls herself a feminist and an activist. Featured in Jo Piazza’s 2014 release, If Nuns Ruled the World (which I devoured on a road trip last summer), the Dominican nun is a champion both for a woman’s right to use contraception and for an individual’s decision to end unwanted pregnancies.

In an archived article for the L.A. Times, she said the following:

“As a peacekeeper, my goal is to enable women to enter a reproductive health clinic in dignity and without fear of being physically assaulted. . . . I am very worried that the publicity around my presence will lead to violations of every woman’s right to privacy and expose them to further violence.”

As I listened to the author tell her story, I couldn’t help but smile at the paradox of it all. She loves Jesus something fierce – so much so, she’s given her life to the work of the Church, including the people in her very own neighborhood.

It was in choosing this life – of service to God and service to the humans around her – that she began accompanying those who most needed a little bit of kindness and compassion.

How might listening to the intersection of Donna’s story and the stories of the women she’s championed change the trajectory of the bill? 

And perhaps most of all, I think about how Jesus responded to the woman who was caught sleeping with a man who wasn’t her husband. In an effort to try and trap Jesus (and not the woman), the religious scholars wanted him to choose between the law and the person – after all, she was merely a ploy to help them prove right their accusations against the Christ.

But in Luke 8, when Jesus, the woman and the religious scholars gather in the dirt, a stack of stones ready to throw at a moment’s notice, something different happens.

Jesus bent down and wrote with his finger in the dirt. They kept at him, badgering him. He straightened up and said, “The sinless one among you, go first: Throw the stone.” Bending down again, he wrote some more in the dirt.

Instead, Jesus stood on the side of compassion. Although it doesn’t look like he listened to her story right then, I can’t help but think about how his actions communicated that he heard her.

He honored her and respected her and treated her with dignity. And as a result, every single one of them walked away different than when they’d arrived, changed by God’s noticing, listening ways.

So, once again, I ask: How might listening to the stories of Jesus, and of noticing how he responded to the people around him, change the trajectory of the bill? 

It takes courage to place our convictions and beliefs to the side and really enter into the art of listening and learning from those who might have something to tell us.

But, my friends, perhaps this is where we start.

From the RAINN website: “Anyone affected by sexual assault, whether it happened to you or someone you care about, can find support from You can also call the National Sexual Assault Hotline at 800.656.HOPE (4673) to be connected with someone over the phone who can help.” Otherwise, regardless of your political stance, how might listening change the trajectory of this bill? 

*Post contains Amazon Affiliate links

"Joseph, I'm happy to pass the book along to you! Would you please send me ..."

Swimming in Prophetic Whirlwinds, Courtesy of ..."
"I want the book by sister Onleilove Alston. I want to learn more about those ..."

Swimming in Prophetic Whirlwinds, Courtesy of ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • “I am a listener and a learner, a studier of people and, maybe like you, a person who seeks to not only hear, but truly honor every side of the story – because when we take the time to listen to another person’s story, we can’t help but be changed.” Have you, though, listened to “every side of the story”? I think not. I think of my unborn children. How might listening with a stethoscope to the distended belly of their mother, and hearing their story…their heartbeats…might have changed the trajectory of your article? I think of the aborted. How might your presence at an actual abortion, and piecing together the arms and legs and head and torso of that tiny human as the doctor ripped the parts from the mother’s womb, in order to make sure that nothing was left inside…how hearing their story might have changed the trajectory of your article?

  • Robert Dolan

    Is it just me or do woman speak to woman as if they are the only ones who understand the abortion issue or the potential pain a young girl might face? I do not believe that to be true. I will grant the position that many men are or pretend to be unfeeling clods. However, I am a man and I feel as though I can completely relate to the issue. To assume that I somehow can’t diminishes or completely dismisses my voice in the discussion. A Psychiatrist doesn’t need to have been psychotic to treat a patient for psychosis.

  • Ruthie

    I agree. Her article was lame.

  • C_Alan_Nault

    Any time someone uses the Bible in their arguments for why abortion is wrong they are demonstrating that they are not very familiar with the Bible.

    According to the Bible,a fetus is not a human being.


    Please show me the verse to support your statement.

  • C_Alan_Nault

    Exodus 21:22 22 And if men strive together, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart, and yet no harm follow; he shall be surely fined, according as the woman’s husband shall lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. 23 But if any harm follow, then thou shalt give life for life

    … in other words,if the attack causes the woman to miscarry, the man that caused the miscarriage is fined but if a person dies ( in other words, if the woman who suffered the miscarriage dies), then it’s a life for a life. The unborn child is obviously not yet considered a person.


    I have looked at 3 different versions of the verse you quoted and it seems to be speaking of the woman giving birth prematurely but the child still living. Isn’t verse 23 saying that if the baby died then it is life for a life. I am NOT a a bible scholar but in my opinion I don’t see your verses supporting the fact that a unborn child is not a person. Thats my interpretation but as I said I am NOT a scholar.