So I visited CAEI today. In addition to reminders about one of two radio shows and another speaking engagement, there were only a couple posts. One, in typical fashion, repeating the MSNBC meme that the GOP is not only idiotic, but also vile and wicked as well. In fairness, Mark like many of his readers, is a proud non-conformist and sees calling a pox down on both houses as the only acceptable Catholic position. So Democrats get no better, though in recent years Mark has been more friendly to moderate Republicans and Democrats in a pinch.
But the post that caught my eye was his take on the story that women want to take Andrew Jackson’s picture off the 20.00 bill and replace it with a feminine hero. At the rate we’re going, most will likely be women and minorities within a generation, so I guess this is the first step. Mark mostly makes fund with it, but he drops the ‘Jackson as crazy racist’ that is common in progressive and non-Anglo-European, Catholic views. That is, America was pretty much a racist, imperialist, genocidal men who were wicked and evil and devoid of much value.
I decided to play a little, and suggested that racism as a deal breaker means rethinking my statement that racism shouldn’t be a strike against Chesterton’s popularity contest canonization. The results are predictable. Of course Jackson was evil, a genocidal murderer, a tyrant, evil, a liar, dishonest, and unworthy of any regard.
The fun was watching the usual liberal stereotypes, childish responses, and hilarious attempts to remain consistent while explaining why suddenly racism may not be that big a deal, when set against American genocide. I only took it somewhat seriously. But it shows the absolute plummet of credibility that marks the blog, and unfortunately, a fairly large swath of Catholic apologetic media today. But this is ground zero for the bizarre evolution, so there I will remain for a couple more weeks.