Evil In The World

Evil In The World October 11, 2007

Hans Urs von Balthasar noted several times that true, demonic evil can only be understood in relation to the Incarnation of the Word of God. Before the light of Christ, demonic influences upon humanity, while it existed, was not properly understood; they lived in the darkness, and they were able to cover themselves and hide themselves from our vision, because the radiant light of Christ had yet to bring them out into the open. This explains, he suggested, why it was only at the time of Christ, and not before, that Satan and the powers of evil were exposed for what they were. It is why, before Christ, there was at best only a vague knowledge of their existence. Moreover, it is only because of Christ and his offer of grace to humanity that a truly demonic response to Christ can rise up from humanity to provide a diabolic No to Christ.

Evil builds upon itself, becoming greater and greater to meet the greater and greater response of Christ. “Evil creates an undertow leading to further evil. The sinner’s self-righteousness vis-à-vis absolute truth (which, by lying, he denies) tends to make him assert that he is absolutely right. Consequently, he uses all the means at his disposal to prove this. The prime means of underpinning the lie is to use sophistical short-circuits in reasoning and distorted aspects of the truth. In this way, the sinner builds a kind of ‘bulwark’ against the real truth; he hides behind its illusion, knowing all the while the truth that he has ‘wickedly suppressed’ (Rom 1:18) will eventually come to lay siege against his citadel,” Hans Urs von Balthasar, Theo-Drama IV: The Action. trans. Graham Harrison (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1994),166-7. The call to power, the call for mechanical domination of the world and it people, is an important, if not central, aspect of the drama of evil. “In a special way, power is the cause and the sphere of decisions, particularly ultimate ones, that is, decisions between God and the demonic,” ibid., 148. This power is only an usurpation of the power of the good, because it is the attempt of a finite will to become absolute and treat itself and its desires as the absolute good. “The power is usurped: in fact, it belongs to him who is almighty and utterly good and manifests his presence. In seeking to arrogate this power to itself, finite freedom does two things: it separates power from self-giving goodness, and it sets itself up against the absolute good – thereby incurring the judgment of the latter,” ibid., 165. The continuous attempts of self-justification that tyrants provide for their will to power and dominate is an obvious clue to the presence of the demonic in the world, and the ever-increasing presence of such tyrants upon the world is evidence for the ever-increasing presence of evil in the world. It is a presence that Balthasar points out will continue to develop upon the theatre of the world until the time of the end, with worse and worse consequences for humanity. The greater God’s involvement in the world, “the greater the resistance it provokes,” ibid. 56. Post-Christian humanity, in its No to Christ develops itself along the lines of the will to power, as can be seen especially in its scientific, technological, and economic developments that seek power and control over the earth without the limits of moral guidance. “The entire modern ideology of progress, even where it wears a religious mask, represents a history of the relationship between earth and heaven that has been tipped up so that heaven is ‘in the future.’ Today it has turned into a naked power-struggle between superpowers using naked technological means of annihilation; this is the completely logical conclusion where something intended as an instrument in the service of man has been made into an absolute,” ibid.92.

Thus in Iraq, in Burma, in Darfur, in Venezuela, and in many other places, we can see the full effects of modern, post-Christian progress. Even in calls for solidarity, even with good desires for the welfare of the people (which must not be denied, most tyrants have it in some warped sense), the call to power and domination by individuals who see themselves and their ideals as the absolute bring to the people affected by such individuals great suffering. The Christian response is never to say yes to the anti-Christian’s No to Christ. It is not to engage the spiral of hate and violence. It is, rather, to be a bold witness, bringing the light of Christ further into the situation, revealing even more that demonic content, and bringing to it Christ’s loving Yes to humanity. The Christian is called to follow Christ, even if it leads, with Christ, into failure; yet, like with Christ, that failure does not have to be the end. The deep, penetrating love of Christ can bring conversion and change, especially in and through the glory of defeat. The Cross of Christ leads to resurrection: and the failure of the Christian in the humble service of love can, as history shows, lead to radical changes and a Yes to Christ.

"Yes, those are all dimensions that need to be addressed. The question of the reception ..."

Reading Rerum Novarum, Part IV
"You frame the question as one asking why Catholic workers failed to embrace Catholic unionism. ..."

Reading Rerum Novarum, Part IV
"Brett, thank you for your response. I would be delighted to read and comment on ..."

The number six and neutrality: a ..."
"Hi David, Thank you for your engagement with my piece. Sorry for the slow reply. ..."

The number six and neutrality: a ..."

Browse Our Archives