An Alternate Reading for Today

An Alternate Reading for Today March 9, 2011

Today, Ash Wednesday, the Gospel reading is from Matthew, on almsgiving in secret.  I offer to you an alternate reading which approaches the Lenten season from a different direction:  Mark 8:27-33.

Jesus and his disciples went on to the villages around Caesarea Philippi. On the way he asked them, “Who do people say I am?” They replied, “Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, one of the prophets.”  “But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?” Peter answered, “You are the Messiah.”  Jesus warned them not to tell anyone about him.

He then began to teach them that the Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders, the chief priests and the teachers of the law, and that he must be killed and after three days rise again. He spoke plainly about this, and Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him.  But when Jesus turned and looked at his disciples, he rebuked Peter. “Get behind me, Satan!” he said. “You do not have in mind the concerns of God, but merely human concerns.”

Today, Ash Wednesday, we begin the Lenten Journey to Easter, and this is the time of year when we must answer again for ourselves the fundamental question of our Christian identity:  who, to us (to me!) is Jesus?  Brother, teacher, master, Lord, God?  Peter distinguishes himself in this passage (and in the parallel passage in Matthew) by his impetuosity in declaring Jesus to be the Christ, the messiah.  But, as Mark is quick to point out, while his heart is in the right place, he does not really “get it.”  No sooner does he declare Jesus the Messiah than he rejects the role laid out for the Messiah (and foretold by the prophet Isaiah).  It took him much longer (indeed, well past the Resurrection) before he understood who Jesus is.

Today at mass we said all the right words:  but do we really understand what we are saying?  Do we really mean it?  For the next forty days we are called to revisit this question–“Who do you say I am?”–not only in an intellectual sense, but from the heart.  We cannot simply say, “Jesus is Lord.”  As we heard in the gospel last Sunday:

Jesus said to his disciples: “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,” will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven.(Mt 7:21)

So I commend to you (as I hope for myself) this Lenten season, a time to learn anew the answer to this central question of our faith. 






"Being an German, where Greta Thunberg has a large group of followers and is all ..."

Greta Thunberg as an echo of ..."
"I don't think they are calling for medieval wars to arms ourselves with weapons and ..."

The Church is not an Army, ..."
"Thank you for this interesting comparison. Though I must admit I find perhaps a bit ..."

Greta Thunberg as an echo of ..."
"Thanks. I didn't know he was 11 years old. ;-)"

A Christian Interpretation of the Mahāvākyas

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • David:

    I don’t think it is possible to “teach” a single, correct and authentic answer to “Who do you say that I am?” anymore than it is possible to teach a single, correct and authentic answer to “what is your favorite color?” Ecstasy is in seeking and finding out for myself, not from being told the “correct” answer.

  • Thales


    A very nice reflection. Thanks.

  • David Cruz-Uribe, SFO

    Frank, nowhere do I suggest that there is a single correct answer to this question. Nor do I suggest that that anyone (the Church?) should teach this. I said that Lent is the time to sincerely ask the question again; by implication I am saying that we need to revisit our (pat) answers that we have given in previous years.

    • …And I’m agreeing with you. I want to share and affirm what my experience of “answering” looks like because it seems very different from what EWTN-style Catholics say.

    • David Cruz-Uribe, SFO

      Okay! Thanks! I missed that the first time around. There is, in one sense, a right answer, but it is relational, not factual, and so a bit different for every person.