While it is possible to get whiplash when one tries to sort out the public relations from the facts of child sex abuse by clergy in the Catholic Church, it is still a worthwhile inquiry. This week it is absolutely critical that all those who care about children pay attention, because the bishops are in high dudgeon as they try to clear the air before Holy Week.
Let us compare some recent statements by Archbishop Timothy Dolan with recent statements by the Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams. Put on your neck brace.
From the 2011 Philadelphia Grand Jury's Report on the Philadelphia Archdiocese, which resulted in criminal indictments against three priests (one now defrocked), a teacher, and a monsignor:
The present grand jury . . . is frustrated to report that much has not changed [since the 2005 Report documenting abuse and a concerted coverup in the Archdiocese]. The rapist priests we accuse were well known to the Secretary of Clergy, but he cloaked their conduct and put them in place to do it again. The procedures implemented by the Archdiocese to help victims are in fact designed to help the abusers, and the Archdiocese itself. Worst of all, apparent abusers—dozens of them, we believe—remain on duty in the Archdiocese, today, with open access to new young prey.
Here is Archbishop Dolan's response in a March 24, 2011, press release on the Conference website: "We bishops recommit ourselves to the rigorous mandates of the Charter, and renew our confidence in its effectiveness."
The 2011 Report again:
Most disheartening to the grand jury was what we learned about the current practice toward accused abusers in the Philadelphia Archdiocese. We would have assumed, by the year 2011, after all the revelations both here and around the world, that the church would not risk its youth by leaving them in the presence of priests subject to substantial evidence of abuse. That is not the case.
In fact, we discovered that there have been at least 37 such priests who have been kept in assignments that expose them to children. Ten of these priests have been in place since before 2005—over six years ago. We understand that accusations are not proof; but we just cannot understand the Archdiocese's apparent absence of any sense of urgency.
Philadelphia's Cardinal Justin Rigali soon thereafter removed twenty-nine priests from active ministry. Admittedly, he did not do it all at once, but that is the running total for now.
This week, the Conference of Bishops released its self-study (which is euphemistically called an "audit") of recent abuse reports. Fr. Roger Landry says that Dolan "suggested that the U.S. bishops, beginning in Dallas in 2002, have shown true signs of repentance, creating a culture that not only is totally intolerant of abuse, but has fostered protocols and procedures that have made the Catholic Church what it always should have been: a leader in the protection of children."
It is certainly heart-warming to know the bishops are leading the way for child protection, especially when its paid pit bull in the media clarifies the bishops' resolve to help children so artfully. The Catholic League purchased a full-page ad in the New York Times this week, which is not worth reprinting, except for one compelling line:
The refrain that child rape is a reality in the Church is twice wrong: let's get it straight—they weren't children and they weren't raped.
Compare this doomed defense with details from the cases filed against the Philadelphia Archdiocese since the 2011 Grand Jury Report was released:
John Doe 10: "While attending St. Aloysius [elementary school], Plaintiff encountered then-Deacon Martin Satchell, when Satchell performed certain functions in the Plaintiff's classroom as part of a program with St. Charles Barromeo Seminary sponsored by the Archdiocese. On one occasion, Plaintiff was lured into a concealed portion of the classroom by Satchell where Plaintiff was sexually abused by Satchell. In addition, Satchell often assumed the responsibility to take boys, including Plaintiff, to the bathroom. While in the bathroom at St. Aloysius on several occasions, Plaintiff was sexually abused by Satchell. . . .
On May 15, 1993, Martin Satchell was ordained as a Roman Catholic Priest within the Archdiocese and was ordained by Cardinal Bevilacqua.. . . In the same year that he was ordained, in September 1993, the Archdiocese received a report that Martin Satchell had sexually abused a child. . . . In 1993, Martin Satchell was sent to sexual offender treatment and evaluation. . . . In 2003, Martin Satchell left the active priesthood and petitioned to be laicized. . . .In 2004, Martin Satchell was laicized.