A Note For Philosophy Non-Specialists About This Blog

Please, if your specialization in life is not philosophy, do not feel unwelcomed when encountering the sorts of detailed phiosophical discussion that this blog specializes in.

When I write on here I am going to write in the clearest and most precise way I can about the philosophical issues that arise in my research on a daily basis and those which arise from readers’ challenges to my thought.

There are two ways, though, to write clearly and precisely.  (1) One is on a highly technical and specialized level which uses terms all members of a discipline or a subdiscipline are familiar with.  These terms are clear and precise insofar as those familiar with the discipline understand the terms and whole constellations of accepted meanings that they impy.  For people in a field, this “jargon,” is a way of referring to concepts already worked out elsewhere and accepted in a quick and shorthand way (rather than having to long-windedly reinvent the wheel and redescribe familiar concepts to the field in every discussion).

(2) The other way to be clear and precise is take the time to translate the jargon of a field back into laymen’s terms to make the debates in the field clear to non-specialists so they can understand why the questions asked are asked and what purpose each of the concepts developed has.

The word “layman” here is a broadly inclusive one.  I am essentially a “layman” in every field but philosophy and theology for example simply because outside of these specializations I do not have a precise grasp of complicated theories and jargon.

As a teacher, I am very concerned to reach out to my lay readers and encourage them to use this blog as a place to inquire about philosophical jargon that they find a barrier to understanding what a given philosophical argument (or philosophy in general) has to offer.

I hope to mix posts that engage other philosophers with posts that encourage philosophical inquiry by non-philosophers.  And often that’s going to mean catching the non-philosophers who read the blog up to speed on our basic questions, categories, and terms.  Readers do me a great, great service when they offer their philosophical questions, challenges, and requests for clarification.  So, please do not be shy if you find this blog challenging or obscure to express that to me and give me the chance to make it a place which maximally serves your ability to understand and enjoy philosophy and to develop your own ideas.  And if you disagree with me, feel as encouraged as possible to express why so that we can have a fruitful, clarifying discussion about what we’re both thinking.

Thanks for reading!

"I applaud your approach and recommend, if you like, “Rogerian Argument” which does - as ..."

Making Arguments Less Tediously Repetitive, Contentious, ..."
"Perhaps this idea's time has come. I like your logical and convincing presentation. I have ..."

Making Arguments Less Tediously Repetitive, Contentious, ..."
"Yes! We need methods to help us have conversations with people we disagree with. Since ..."

Making Arguments Less Tediously Repetitive, Contentious, ..."
"Snoke is not well developed because he does not need to be. We already know ..."

Religion and Philosophy in The Last ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment