The Emergence Of Cooperative Systems

The Primate Diaries reviews a study by The American Naturalist describing how competitive bacteria form cooperative colonies. These high-level patterns emerge despite the fact that individuals in the colony behave selfishly.

To understand the emergence of apparent cooperation, consider ants on a sidewalk:

Have you ever wondered why ant trails in the city so often fall along cracks in the pavement or in gaps between the cement? The ants certainly didn’t plan this out in advance. It occurs based on the collective behavior of individual ants and the external forces that shape the outcome. When there are only a few ants following a pheromone trail the likelihood that they’ll be stepped on by a random pedestrian is fairly low. But once thousands of ants begin crossing back and forth continuously it’s bound to happen. When it does the pheromone trail is disturbed and the ants must adjust their path as a result. After multiple such disturbances the path is accidentally laid down inside one of these gaps where the ant trail is now protected from foot traffic. A stable system has now emerged without any one individual responsible for its development nor even understanding how or why it works.

Bacteria form patterns via the same principle:

A similar result can be found when the [bacteria] are all pushing each other outwards as they reproduce. The narrow passages within the emerging labyrinth are what allow nutrients to flow to the bacteria along all sides of their structure. However, when the collective mechanical push causes one of the labyrinth passages to narrow, the cells on the inside can’t get enough nutrients to reproduce and they slow their growth. This causes the labyrinth passage to expand once again as the cells die off naturally, allowing equilibrium to return.

As remarkable as it may seem, complex cooperative systems are the end result of nothing more than the collective behavior of individuals and the external forces that shape their outcome.

I find this fascinating from an evolutionary perspective: This is not conscious cooperation as we understand it, but a good example of how such behavioral (dare I say “moral”?) tendencies might evolve in more complex organisms.

The author seems to think emergent processes such as this might in fact kick in as human population stresses the natural resources of Earth – hopefully helping us out of a sticky situation:

It’s possible that the human species is now approaching a level of global saturation that the [bacteria] were forced to respond to in their microhabitats. Will we respond the same way?

While the prospects are certainly dire it’s somewhat reassuring to know that, while our individual actions will continue to be important, there may be natural systems in place to help shape the outcome whether we’re aware of it happening or not.

Maybe, but I’m sceptical that we’ll be willing to wait for natural processes to solve these problems for us. One hopes that we don’t have to squash too many people on the sidewalk before figuring out a workable solution.

Patheos Atheist LogoLike Camels With Hammers and Patheos Atheist on Facebook!

About Daniel Fincke

Dr. Daniel Fincke  has his PhD in philosophy from Fordham University and spent 11 years teaching in college classrooms. He wrote his dissertation on Ethics and the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. On Camels With Hammers, the careful philosophy blog he writes for a popular audience, Dan argues for atheism and develops a humanistic ethical theory he calls “Empowerment Ethics”. Dan also teaches affordable, non-matriculated, video-conferencing philosophy classes on ethics, Nietzsche, historical philosophy, and philosophy for atheists that anyone around the world can sign up for. (You can learn more about Dan’s online classes here.) Dan is an APPA  (American Philosophical Practitioners Association) certified philosophical counselor who offers philosophical advice services to help people work through the philosophical aspects of their practical problems or to work out their views on philosophical issues. (You can read examples of Dan’s advice here.) Through his blogging, his online teaching, and his philosophical advice services each, Dan specializes in helping people who have recently left a religious tradition work out their constructive answers to questions of ethics, metaphysics, the meaning of life, etc. as part of their process of radical worldview change.