Kagan Called A Pro-Separation Of Church And State Opinion Dumb

Secular Coalition for America writes:

In a 1987 dissent in the case of Bowen v. Kendrick, Justice Stevens, along with three other highly respected justices, addressed significant problems with a statute which gave government funds to religious organizations which in turn “educated” teens about sex and pregnancy. The justices understood that such a statute would inevitably lead to sectarian organizations using public funds to act on their religious beliefs, in contradiction with good public health policy. The justices wrote, “Where the targeted audience is composed of children, of course, the Court’s insistence on adequate safeguards has always been greatest.” The concerns expressed by these justices were well-founded, as one group used government funds to teach children about sex with the express mission “to make themselves better instruments in God’s plan,” and as “facilitat[ing] the evangelization of homes.”

The Secular Coalition for America is highly disappointed by Ms. Kagan’s response to a Senate Judiciary Committee inquiry during her Solicitor General confirmation hearing. Ms. Kagan characterized a memo she authored pertaining to Bowen v. Kendrick, while serving as a law clerk for Justice Thurgood Marshall, opposing the federal funding of religious organizations as “the dumbest thing I ever read” and “deeply mistaken.”

In the memo she stated, “…when the government funding is to be used for projects so close to the central concerns of religion, all religious organizations should be off limits.” The Secular Coalition for America agrees with her original opinion as written.

Your Thoughts?

"Getting out of religion and back into nature is incredibly difficult. Cult-ural Science, cult-ural religion, ..."

Have I Considered Catholicism Sufficiently?
"Following on from my last past here - As pervasive as the term original sin ..."

Have I Considered Catholicism Sufficiently?

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment