Rape By Deception

ProfMTH explores legal definitions that define sex acquired through fraud as rape:

embedded by Embedded Video

YouTube Direkt

I have argued before, formally speaking, deception is a kind of force. Laws which treat procurement of sex through fraud as a form of rape seem to stem from similar considerations of the relationship between at least certain forms of deliberate deceit and violence. Should they?

Your Thoughts?

  • http://asystemofrandomtangents.wordpress.com/ Anna Johnstone

    The every [civilised] Nation’s laws should be protecting the vulnerable. Just because some are gullible enough to get conned, does not mean the perpetrators should go unpunished and when the trespass is sexual then it is all the more important.

  • KM

    Courtship behavior is a common and “normal” pattern in the animal kingdom, which by the way includes humans.
    This includes hiding and also lying.

    If a law such as the one above would be followed strictly, then every person could/should be considered a rapist.

    Where should we draw the line?
    Basically i think the line should be drawn where consent is missing and force is applied.

  • http://before-i-sleep.com Dark Horse

    Rape by fraud or trick is none the less rape … sexual penetration without consent, or in this case, consent that would not have been given if the truth had been known.

    Recently a Jewish woman won a case of rape by fraud when an Arab, who professed to be an Israeli, had sex with her. She contended that she would not have consented if she had known the man wasn’t an Israeli.

    As someone said, the laws are intended to protect the innocent and gullible.