Is it possible to both be appalled at what Scott Walker is doing in Wisconsin where there was no budget crisis before he introduced tax breaks the state could not afford earlier this year and yet still be sympathetic to Chris Christie’s gutsy approach to achieving fiscal solvency in a state otherwise headed for an actual catastrophe? Because that’s how I feel.
Is there something I’m missing about either Walker or Christie? Because I’ve yet to hear a good argument in Walker’s favor or one that substantively debunks Christie’s cases for his choices in New Jersey. Your Thoughts?