The Claymation Allegory of the Cave

A wonderful brief film of Plato’s allegory of the Cave by Michael Ramsey and John Grigsby:

Your Thoughts?

About Daniel Fincke

Dr. Daniel Fincke  has his PhD in philosophy from Fordham University and spent 11 years teaching in college classrooms. He wrote his dissertation on Ethics and the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. On Camels With Hammers, the careful philosophy blog he writes for a popular audience, Dan argues for atheism and develops a humanistic ethical theory he calls “Empowerment Ethics”. Dan also teaches affordable, non-matriculated, video-conferencing philosophy classes on ethics, Nietzsche, historical philosophy, and philosophy for atheists that anyone around the world can sign up for. (You can learn more about Dan’s online classes here.) Dan is an APPA  (American Philosophical Practitioners Association) certified philosophical counselor who offers philosophical advice services to help people work through the philosophical aspects of their practical problems or to work out their views on philosophical issues. (You can read examples of Dan’s advice here.) Through his blogging, his online teaching, and his philosophical advice services each, Dan specializes in helping people who have recently left a religious tradition work out their constructive answers to questions of ethics, metaphysics, the meaning of life, etc. as part of their process of radical worldview change.

  • Francisco Bacopa

    I always figured The Matrix was a BIV story. This video brings to mind it also might be a Cave story as well.

    BTW, Those of you interested in brains in vats might want to read Daniel Dennett’s Where Am I? Totally mind blowing essay, and quite accessible to folks without any formal training in philosophy.

    http://www.newbanner.com/SecHumSCM/WhereAmI.html

  • aspidoscelis

    It’s a well-done portrayal, but I’ve always thought the allegory of the cave was execrable in print and I feel about the same about it in claymation. What it boils down to seems to be: if Plato knows things that are True, it doesn’t matter that he can’t demonstrate them to be True… they’re True anyways, and that’s what matters.

  • justawriter

    I’ve always thought that Plato was mostly right, he just got things backwards. His ideal forms are the shadows by which we try to understand the world while variation from form is the reality of the universe. We cannot hope to understand one billion cats, so we create CAT, an ideal which has the elements we can agree are shared by as many of the cats as we can observe. But CAT is an abstraction, a reduction of all the properties of cats. CAT cannot tell us about a cat, because cats vary. Now CAT is useful because it can help us distinguish cat from non-cat, however the cat that is farthest removed from the ideal form of CAT is still a cat. So the ideal form is a useful shadow but is less informative than imperfect and varying reality.

    • aspidoscelis

      I believe you have a good point there.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X