Feminist Philosophy of Religion

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Feminist Philosophy of Religion recently received a substantial revision. The entry looks quite long and ambitious.

Your Thoughts?

If you enjoy reading my philosophical blog posts, consider taking one of my online philosophy classes! I earned my PhD and taught 93 university classes before I went into business for myself. My online classes involve live, interactive class discussions with me and your fellow students held over videoconference (using Google Hangout, which downloads in just seconds). Classes involve personalized attention to your own ideas and questions. Course content winds up tailored to your interests as lively and rigorous class discussions determine where exactly we go. Classes are flexible enough to meet the needs of both beginners and students with existing philosophical background

My classes require no outside reading or homework or grades–only a once weekly 2.5 hour commitment that fits the schedules of busy people. My classes are university quality but I can offer no university credit whatsoever. New classes start up every month and you can join existing groups of students if you want. Click on the classes that interest you below and find the course descriptions, up-to-date schedules, and self-registration. 1-on-1 classes can be arranged by appointment if you write me at camelswithhammers@gmail.com.


Men Apologizing For “Having Abortions”
ISIS’s Iconoclasm, The Bible, and The Problem With Taking Literalism Literally
Lonely Nerd Girls Suffer Too
Are Religions Unfair to Women?
About Daniel Fincke

Dr. Daniel Fincke  has his PhD in philosophy from Fordham University and spent 11 years teaching in college classrooms. He wrote his dissertation on Ethics and the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. On Camels With Hammers, the careful philosophy blog he writes for a popular audience, Dan argues for atheism and develops a humanistic ethical theory he calls “Empowerment Ethics”. Dan also teaches affordable, non-matriculated, video-conferencing philosophy classes on ethics, Nietzsche, historical philosophy, and philosophy for atheists that anyone around the world can sign up for. (You can learn more about Dan’s online classes here.) Dan is an APPA  (American Philosophical Practitioners Association) certified philosophical counselor who offers philosophical advice services to help people work through the philosophical aspects of their practical problems or to work out their views on philosophical issues. (You can read examples of Dan’s advice here.) Through his blogging, his online teaching, and his philosophical advice services each, Dan specializes in helping people who have recently left a religious tradition work out their constructive answers to questions of ethics, metaphysics, the meaning of life, etc. as part of their process of radical worldview change.

  • Mary

    I wish I had seen what it looked like before. Right now it seems to cover almost all of the feminist-theory concepts I encounter in my theology classes. The part about discourse is SO important. I recently read a book called “Naming the Witch” (K. Stratton) and “Ancient Greek Love Magic” (C. Faraone) which both point out that ancient literary and historical stories of the practice of magic almost ALWAYS paint magic, particularly love magic, as something practiced almost exclusively by women. When men DO practice magic, it is always always always a woman who brings him to it. There is a trope in the Greco-Roman classics of a man who is either supposed to be a fool or a bad guy who travels abroad and finds witches for nefarious purposes. But, the material and papyrological evidence says otherwise. According to what we know from magical texts and from binding love spells and other things, men were overwhelmingly the practitioners of magic and overwhelmingly the keepers of magical texts.

    Feminist discourse is a relatively new cottage industry in scholarship, but it is really important because so much of what we believe about history (how many times have you heard things like “women have always throughout history)…” is actually the representation of the world based on the opinions of a few, educated men and doesn’t reflect reality. It’s also really important for opening up how our discourse informs our decisions as well.

  • peterh

    If those “few, educated men” were sufficiently educated, they’d lay off the sweeping generalities. Yeh – that’s a generality, too. But it’s not just women’s issues that might be better served by a reduction in tempting generalities which don’t fully reflect reality. Not that a given line of inquiry will necessarily turn perfect, but it’s to be hoped the effort towards attaining accuracy and catholicity would remain in the writers’ and thinkers’ minds.