An atheist activist on Facebook asked why he should care at all about Cee-Lo changing the words to “Imagine” to sanitize its anti-religious sentiment last night. Me? I think it’s a great idea to seize on this story. What I’m discovering from this incident and from the one last month where Rick Perry made an “I’m a Christian and isn’t it outrageous gays are treated like people” ad is that atheists’ anti-religious privilege campaigns are best served when something else that non-atheists also care about is also bound up with the atheist concern.
“Oh, Rick Perry made a run-of-the-mill theocratic ad about how god should run the government? That’s just ‘smart politics’ appealing to Iowa Evangelical voters. And what was that, atheists? Something about “separation of church and state”? What quaint notions you have! Everyone knows that modern political campaigns have to be as faith-savvy as possible and that politicians need to prove they can pass religious tests and provide legislation that will satisfy religious interests if they are going to make it in today’s political climate! Even the Democrats are learning how to do this. Don’t worry your petty little heads over all this faith talk. It just means politicians have values and are accountable to values voters—-Wait—what?? Perry dehumanized gays in a theocratic ad? Now that’s terrible!! Let the huge viral backlash commence!” …aaand suddnely we have a great chance for atheistic/anti-theocratic arguments and memes to be propagated since the dangers of theocracy are visibly a demonstrable threat to something millions of non-atheist people care about—the rights and dignity of gay citizens.
So I say that we atheist activists should turn up our detectors for stories which are not only about religious privilege’s intrinsic obnoxiousness or its affects on atheists, but which also demonstrate religious privilege’s negative affects on people and interests that mainstream culture actually gives a crap about.