On The Need To End Job Discrimination Against Trans Individuals

This morning, Kylar Broadus, the founder of the Trans People of Color Coalition, testified on behalf of the inclusion of trans people under the proposed protections of ENDA. Below is his testimony. According to Zack Ford, this is the first ever trans witness in the United States Senate. Ford has more details and some key quotes.

Your Thoughts?

Before I Deconverted: I Saw My First “Secular Humanist” On TV
The “Tranny” Debate: A Musing in Two Anecdotes, a Comparison, and a Proposal
Jonah Hill’s Apology For Anti-Gay Slur
About Daniel Fincke

Dr. Daniel Fincke  has his PhD in philosophy from Fordham University and spent 11 years teaching in college classrooms. He wrote his dissertation on Ethics and the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. On Camels With Hammers, the careful philosophy blog he writes for a popular audience, Dan argues for atheism and develops a humanistic ethical theory he calls “Empowerment Ethics”. Dan also teaches affordable, non-matriculated, video-conferencing philosophy classes on ethics, Nietzsche, historical philosophy, and philosophy for atheists that anyone around the world can sign up for. (You can learn more about Dan’s online classes here.) Dan is an APPA  (American Philosophical Practitioners Association) certified philosophical counselor who offers philosophical advice services to help people work through the philosophical aspects of their practical problems or to work out their views on philosophical issues. (You can read examples of Dan’s advice here.) Through his blogging, his online teaching, and his philosophical advice services each, Dan specializes in helping people who have recently left a religious tradition work out their constructive answers to questions of ethics, metaphysics, the meaning of life, etc. as part of their process of radical worldview change.

  • http://criticallyskeptic-dckitty.blogspot.com Katherine Lorraine, Chaton de la Mort

    Sadly, the witness was testifying to a room with supporters only. No opponents of the bill are going to hear this important message. They’ll just vote against it without a care about who it’d affect.

  • John Horstman

    My thoughts are that gender discrimination is absurd, though I also think it’s possible to construct trans discrimination as sex-based if we hold gender/expression to be the constant and vary the sex: if someone of a different sex was engaging in the same sort of gendered behaviors for which someone is being discriminated against, then they would be treated differently. This is a clear case of sex-based differential treatment. (The same goes for sexuality – hold object choice to be the constant and observe that treatment differs on the basis of the sex of the person expressing sexual desire.) Of course, I see no reason to NOT include gender/expression as a protected class.