We Have an Admirer!

Well, not really an admirer—more like an antagonist.  But I say that in a good way.

Matt Slick runs the CARM (Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry) web site.  He interviewed me on his radio show about a dozen times in 2007.  We reconnected recently, and he responded to my Science Answers the Big Questions post.

His reply is here.

Unfortunately, there’s not much to respond to.  Matt seems mostly concerned about sloppy thinking, making sure we put materialistic thinking into the “science” bin and philosophical thinking into the “philosophy” bin, making sure words are used correctly, and so on.  Nothing wrong with that, of course, but I didn’t find anything interesting enough to respond to.

But let me sharpen one point.  I said that science answers the Big Questions of Life.  It would probably be better to say that what science tells us about reality means that wedon’t need religion’s answers.  Science’s natural answers show that looking for a transcendental purpose or an ultimate mind are unnecessary.

"Though different people, on account of their shortsightedness or lack of courage, appoint various types ..."

The God Debate, 3 of 3 ..."
"Who the hell would spend this much effort on satire?"

The God Debate, 3 of 3 ..."
"The very same community that gives out mulligans to Trump."

More Sloppy Thinking from William Lane ..."
"But how do you know all that? Citing the Qu'ran or an Islamic scholar isn't ..."

The God Debate, 3 of 3 ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment