December 2013 Book Reviews

I’m a bit behind on my book reviews (again), so here’s a post reviewing the two most recent that’ve come my way. As per my usual book review policy, I accepted review copies of both books, but no other compensation.

A Modern Christmas Carol by Bob Seidensticker

My Patheos colleague Bob Seidensticker has written a novelette, A Modern Christmas Carol, that adapts the Dickens story to advance a moral of rationalism. His Scrooge character is named Nathan Thorpe, an arrogant superstar televangelist who’s accumulated a massive fortune through his media empire, but who still grapples with private doubts about Christianity he hasn’t been able to suppress. Besides him, the other primary character is Thorpe’s secretary, Kay, who struggles with an abusive husband and a daughter with a chronic heart condition, both because of her boss’ teachings against divorce and abortion. There’s also an activist working for a religious accountability organization who’s pressuring Thorpe’s ministry to open its books, which he resists because of the vast wealth he’s selfishly accumulated.

You know how the old story goes, but Seidensticker has some fun with it. There are some nice touches, like how the Marley character, Thorpe’s old mentor Lloyd, has to spend eternity not wrapped in chains but burdened by the weight of all the worthless religious trinkets he used to give away through his ministry in exchange for donations. Another scene that works especially well is when the Ghost of Christmas Present takes Thorpe to see two of his donors: an ailing elderly couple, living in grinding poverty, who are persuaded by his televised sermons to give away much of the tiny amount of money they have.

It’s a brief but well-written book, taking just a few quick strokes to paint a remarkably realistic picture of the life of an alienated, arrogant TV preacher, and working in a surprisingly convincing set of arguments for atheism besides. (My favorite: “Why is faith necessary when that’s all a false religion would be based on?” [p.24])

On the other hand, I don’t want to put too much weight on what’s essentially an allegory, but I do have to say that the “Christmas Carol” motif, with its inherent supernaturalism, fits awkwardly with the book’s conclusion advocating rational skepticism. Even before his conversion, Thorpe is very matter-of-fact about his ghostly visitations, though you might expect a minister to wonder at least a little about how these beings fit into his theology.

Atheism for Dummies by Dale McGowan

My colleague Dale McGowan was approached by the publishers of the popular “For Dummies” series to write a book on atheism. If the “Dummies” imprint led you to expect a lightweight, cursory treatment of what atheism is, prepare to be surprised! Despite its cartoony layout, it’s actually a quite detailed look at atheism both ancient and modern.

McGowan begins by defining atheism and the many labels that cluster with it (deists agnostics, secular humanists, pantheists). He explains, gently but unapologetically, why atheists don’t believe in gods and lays out the positive values we do hold instead, including a detailed exploration of secular morality. He also briefly describes his own deconversion story.

The second part surveys atheism in the ancient world, following in the footsteps of authors like Jennifer Michael Hecht’s Doubt: A History. But McGowan’s treatment is remarkably thorough, and even covers some territory I haven’t seen before. He cites godlessness in some surprising places, including not just the requisite chapters on Greece, medieval Europe and the Enlightenment, but ancient India and China, even the Islamic world at the height of its imperial power and ambition. He names and quotes many freethinking personages throughout history, including some I didn’t know of and want to learn more about, like the ancient Chinese nontheist philosophers Xun Zi and Mencius, the Jain teacher Jinasena, the firebrand ex-Muslim theologian al-Rawandi, and the 20th-century Indian activist Gora. He even finds religious doubt in the Viking sagas of medieval Iceland. Following this, there’s a detailed summary of developments in the last hundred years, including the emergence of modern humanism in the 20th century, the growing ranks of the godless at the dawn of the 21st century, and the more recent rise of the New Atheist movement.

One thing I especially appreciated is that he devotes a whole chapter to the role of humor and satire in fomenting godlessness, a tactic that’s long deserved the prominent role it’s given here. He closes by citing some of the better-known atheist books for readers who want to find out more, as well as some of the prominent blogs and other internet references. (Full disclosure: He cites my blog among them, calling it “smart and thoughtful” and “one of the best voices in atheist opinion”. I’m blushing!)

All in all, I think this book more than stands on its own among works on atheist philosophy and history. So, let’s talk about that title. I have no idea whether it makes this book more or less likely to be read by the people who need to see it most; I can readily come up with arguments for both sides. What do you think?

Bangladesh Is Killing Atheists
The Rebirth of Nullification in Alabama
Neil deGrasse Tyson Shows Why Small-Minded Religious Fundamentalists Are Threatened by Wonders of Universe
A Christian vs. an Atheist: On God and Government, Part 10
About Adam Lee

Adam Lee is an atheist writer and speaker living in New York City. His new novel, City of Light, is available in paperback and e-book. Read his full bio, or follow him on Twitter.

  • Cat Sittingstill

    Well, I don’t find the “For Dummies” title any kind of turn-off myself; I’ve always been confident I wasn’t a dummy, and my reaction from the beginning was “if a dummy can learn it from this, I will have no trouble.”
    That said, I know some people don’t want to be seen with a book with “For Dummies” in the title; I suppose they might shy away from it.
    If on the other hand you’re thinking “Atheism” would be the turn-off–maybe so but I think people like that would freak out when they figured out the subject even if your title was “Fluffy Bunnies Of Love And Light.”
    (Full disclosure: I read “Atheism for Dummies” and enjoyed it very much. To be fair, it did have the advantage that I had just finished “God Is Not One” by Steven Prothero, with its awful chapter on atheists–so “Atheism For Dummies” looked like a work of genius by comparison.)

  • Elizabeth

    I bought the Dummies book and really think it’s great. Some atheist history books are just a little too heavy going…I found this very enjoyable!

  • smrnda

    The cover art of Bob’s book is rather interesting. It looks like the preacher is wearing spandex over an incredibly muscular physique. At the same time, I’m sure some televangelist would do that.

  • Adam Lee

    Yes, that’s a plot point. He’s a bodybuilder type.

  • Adam Lee

    I was thinking the “For Dummies” part of the title might be a turnoff for some, particularly when the book is given as a gift. (“Hey, here’s a great book on atheism I really thought you should read…”)

    Then again, it seems the Dummies series is popular enough for them to commission books about everything under the sun. So maybe I’m not the best judge of these things.