Pentagon to Offer Some Same-Sex Marriage Benefits

Pentagon to Offer Some Same-Sex Marriage Benefits February 9, 2013

Leon Panetta is on his way out as the Secretary of Defense, but he’s reportedly planning to issue a directive that grants the married same-sex partners of military personnel some benefits, but not all. It’s not clear yet what particular benefits because of DOMA:

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has not made a final decision on which benefits will be included, the officials said, but the Pentagon is likely to allow same-sex partners to have access to the on-base commissary and other military subsidized stores, as well as some health and welfare programs.

Panetta must walk a fine, legal line. While there has been increased pressure on the Pentagon to extend some benefits to same-sex partners, defense officials must be careful not to violate the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA. The federal law forbids the federal government from recognizing any marriage other than those between a man and a woman.

An announcement is expected to come in the next several days. Officials discussed the plan on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly speak about internal Pentagon deliberations.

This is yet another reason why DOMA has to go, either by repeal (not very likely at this point) or court order (considerably more likely).

"A lot of Americans would also like to have that choice!"

Trump’s Idiotic Stance on Trade with ..."
""Did Trump get hit by a golfwrecking ball??? ""

Trump Rescinds Order to Declassify Documents ..."
"AND inflated his narcissistic ego to an even larger size! He just keep betterer and ..."

Trump Rescinds Order to Declassify Documents ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Oh, that’s just fucking GREAT! Now even the KKKristians with jenyoowine miltary weppinz are gonna be persecuted!! Why does the DoD hate MurKKKa?

  • Crudely Wrott

    Our legislators have created a sticky wicket for the military. Defying an unjust and most likely unconstitutional law places them on that thin line between voiding the law and getting busted in rank.

    Actually, this whole scenario is rank. Just think how much easier and cost effective it would be to treat everyone similarly, with due respect and full accord of individual rights.

    Oh, wait . . . too easy. Such an approach doesn’t account for personal offense. After all, the avoidance of personal offense to the acolytes of True Americanism is much more important than such trivialities as national defense and insuring equal rights for all. Silly me.