Business as Usual Continues in Politics

When President Obama took office, he promised to change business as usual in Washington. No lobbyists would work in his administration, he declared, but quickly made so many exceptions to the rule that it became irrelevant. And in reality, as Noam Scheiber notes, virtually nothing has changed; the revolving door is still revolving as quickly as ever, especially in the second term.

Welcome to the buckraking phase of the Obama era. If the campaign was about hope, and the early presidency was about change, increasingly the administration has settled into a kind of normalcy in which it accommodates itself to Washington far more than Washington accommodates itself to Obama. That’s not necessarily a bad thing when the result is a bipartisan schmooze-fest at the Jefferson Hotel. But when it comes to the D.C. custom of trading a White House security clearance for a private-sector sinecure, there’s a lot to be said for not going native so easily.

He does say that former Obama officials have generally avoided joining lobbying firms and have opted either for consulting firms or for starting their own ventures.

There are more than enough ways to cash in on a White House tour of duty that fall comfortably within the red lines governing Obama’s Washington. No one in the West Wing, from the president on down, would begrudge former colleagues the chance to make a buck so long as a modicum of tact is displayed.

The easiest place to accomplish this is at a Washington consulting firm that takes on corporate clients. For example, a group of companies might hire a firm like SKDKnickerbocker—a popular destination among young Obama operatives, run by former White House communications director Anita Dunn—to wage a P.R. campaign for certain tax advantages over their competitors. (The New Republic was an SKDKnickerbocker client.) “Ninety-nine percent of the time it’s two big rich companies fighting over something, and you pick a side,” says a former administration official now in the consulting world.

Or a client caught in an unfortunate regulatory snag might want to know where to plead its case. “They say, ‘Listen, we have a problem with the White House. We think we should talk to Joe Smith,’ ” says the former official, describing a typical interaction. “I say: ‘That guy is a total moron. He’s not the person to talk to on this issue.’ … It’s giving background advice to people without lobbying.”

But it turns out the highest-profile White House grads don’t so much join consulting firms these days; they found them. A boldfaced Obama name can rake in upward of $25,000 per month from a client just by dialing into a conference call and drafting a memo from time to time. Four clients means more than a million dollars a year with virtually no overhead. “You can run a business like that on an iPad and a cell phone,” says the former administration official.

The alternative is to rent out office space and staff up, in hopes of one day growing into a consulting powerhouse. This is the Glover Park Group model, based on the firm a group of former Clinton and Gore hands opened in 2001 and nurtured into a 160-person juggernaut. Jim Messina appears to have ambitions in this vein, having procured office space and hired support staff. Former Obama press secretary Robert Gibbs, who briefly flirted with trying to return to the White House, is in the process of launching a similar firm with Ben LaBolt, the 2012 campaign press secretary.

None of this is really Obama’s fault, of course. This is just the way Washington has worked for decades and will continue to work, probably forever.

"I'm genuinely beginning to wonder if there's any hope of turning back from this post-factual ..."

Trump Was Shown Proof of Putin ..."
"I guess I phrased that badly. What I meant to say was that these particular ..."

Trump Was Shown Proof of Putin ..."
"Just look how much you inspired Sheila!Atta boy!"

Need Much More to Launch Secular ..."
"Stand strong, friend Modus. We are all depending on you.If you should fail and all ..."

White Supremacists Love Putin Too

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • I hate that I’m quoting Palin, but really: How’s that hopey changey stuff working out?

  • Who Knows?

    I hate that I’m quoting Palin, but really: How’s that hopey changey stuff working out?

    Doubt that Gregory. I bet you’ve been waiting for months to use that line.

  • slc1

    Or, to quote a more authoritative source then the Palinator, namely Voltaire, “the more things change, the more they remain the same”.

  • birgerjohansson

    The most devastating non-change is Obama’s reliance on beltway economists who are complicit in creating the meltdown in the first place. There is no margin for reforms if the recession is stretched on forever through austerity, like in Japan.

    Ironically the new conservative Japanese premier seems to be more positive to economic stimulation than the Americans. The Japanese have learned from recent past experience. In USA and Britain those who lived during the great depression are dead, and the new generation of politicians have not been confronted with austerity realities before.

    The most morally repugnant non-change is the get-out-of-jail card to torturers, and the continued expansion of the police state. And the bombings by robot proxy.

  • Once again, we are trapped between “ugh!” and “eeew!” – the choice of no-choice. Democracy would be nice.

  • howdini

    ‘”You can run a business like that on an iPad and a cell phone,” says the former administration official.’

    Boy, did l ever pick the wrong line o’work.