CFI Urges Senate to Consider Atheist Persecution in Bill

The U.S. Senate is considering a bill called the Near East and South Central Asia Religious Freedom Act, which would create a special envoy in the State Department to monitor and promote the religious freedom of minorities in that area of the world. The amazing Michael De Dora of CFI has written a letter to the committee chairs asking them to include the non-religious in that envoy’s mandate.

Several international treaties, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, protect the rights to freedom of religion, belief, and expression for all persons. This includes to right to believe and worship as one would like. It also includes the right to disbelieve in any particular religion, or all religions, as well as the right to criticize all religious ideas.

Unfortunately many countries ignore their commitments to these international treaties. This is especially true in the Near East and South Central Asia, where governments regularly persecute their citizens for crimes of thought or speech.

The House version of this bill, H.R. 301, listed several instances of persecution. These include attacks on Ahmadi Muslims in Pakistan, as well as attacks on Christians in Afghanistan, Egypt, Iraq, and Pakistan…

CFI commends the sponsors of the Senate bill for using more inclusive language than their colleagues in the House. However, we urge you to reiterate to your colleagues on the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations that any and all international religious freedom work performed by the United States government should include protecting the rights of all persons – religious and non-religious alike. As understood in both American and international law, the term “religious minorities” is not limited to Christians, Muslims, and Jews, but persons of all faith traditions, as well as persons of no faith. Creating a governmental position that monitors only certain religious groups not only violates the spirit, if not the letter of the Establishment Clause, but unfairly leaves out other persecuted groups that equally deserve our help.

Well said.

"is that the “first KKK” that formed after the Civil War was totally different from ..."

Unqualified Judicial Nominee Defended ‘First KKK’
"No problem! Simply utter the magic words: "They have the technology. Just sayin'.""

Taylor: The Illuminati Sent the Hurricanes ..."
"What every commentor has failed to grasp is that the woman in question was wearing ..."

Trump’s Blatant Hypocrisy on Sexual Harassment
"You are mistaken. Al Franken never used the word, but it did give you another ..."

Trump’s Blatant Hypocrisy on Sexual Harassment

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • John Pieret

    It was reported out of the committee but apparently without amendment:

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c113:2:./temp/~c113Usjirh::

  • D. C. Sessions

    Bad enough that the non-religious are the only group left for them to go after. We can’t that that away from them too!