“Lord” Christopher Monckton apparently fancies himself an expert on the First Amendment and in his latest Worldnetdaily column, he demands that Congress pass a law outlawing all passages of the Quran that call for violence. He says nothing, of course, about virtually identical verses in the Bible.
Craven public authorities have failed to act against the circulation of the Quran in its present form because they fear a violent backlash.
How, then, is this manifestly illegal text to be dealt with? It is not our custom to ban books, for freedom of speech is guaranteed by the Constitution.
However, it is our custom to prosecute for incitement to murder. And the fact that incitement is on every page of what is said to be a holy book does not diminish, still less extinguish, the offense.
A bill should be brought before Congress identifying all passages in the Quran which, whether in isolation or taken together, constitute incitement to murder.The bill should specify that anyone who reads any of these passages out loud is to be charged with that crime and, if convicted, subjected to the usual penalty for it – a long prison term.
The bill should state that, after a grace period of a year, every copy of the Quran must clearly identify by emboldened and different-colored text the passages that constitute criminal incitement to murder, together with a clearly printed warning on the first page that reading any of these passages out loud anywhere within the jurisdiction of the United States may result in prosecution.
And of course your next column will demand that same thing for Numbers 31 and many, many other Bible passages that say nearly the same thing, right? Of course not. Which is why no one need take you the least bit seriously.